1926年慕尼黑建筑展

Q4 Arts and Humanities Art in Translation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755
Theo Lechner
{"title":"1926年慕尼黑建筑展","authors":"Theo Lechner","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"15 1","pages":"43 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Architecture Exhibition in Munich 1926\",\"authors\":\"Theo Lechner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2023.2191755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名建筑师,Theo Lechner致力于巴伐利亚传统的设计语言和建筑技术。在这篇文章中,他回顾了1926年在慕尼黑举办的一个建筑展览,他对包豪斯倡导的现代主义和任何建筑国际主义的暗示都非常不屑一顾,他认为这是苏联共产主义的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Architecture Exhibition in Munich 1926
Abstract As an architect, Theo Lechner was committed to traditional Bavarian design languages and constructional techniques. In this article, a review of a building exhibition staged in Munich in 1926, he is very dismissive of the modernism promoted by the Bauhaus and of any hint of architectural internationalism, which he saw as a manifestation of Soviet communism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Art in Translation
Art in Translation Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Prospects or the End of Neo-Dadaism The Black Flowers of Robert Mapplethorpe Roy Lichtenstein Imagination Put on Bread and Water Pollock Exhibition: A Myth Arrives from America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1