双中心生活空间的空间组织概念

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spatium Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI:10.2298/spat1942001a
Djordje Alfirevic, Sanja Simonović-Alfirević
{"title":"双中心生活空间的空间组织概念","authors":"Djordje Alfirevic, Sanja Simonović-Alfirević","doi":"10.2298/spat1942001a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a functional sense, the centre of the living space is a gathering area for\n its users and for visitors. In most cases, the living area has at least one\n space towards which its users gravitate daily or occasionally. In situations\n where there are two or more centres in the living area, their position, size\n and connection determine the character of the functional organization, and\n they result from the social needs of the users. This paper analyzes\n characteristic examples of how dwellings are organized with several\n gathering centres, drawing out three basic concepts: a) living space with\n centres grouped in a social zone, b) living space with a flexible centre on\n the boundary between zones and c) living space with a secondary centre in a\n private area. On the other hand, attention is drawn to the existence of\n different boundaries of territoriality (boundaries of ownership, hospitality\n and intimacy), which determine the domains of social, private and intimate\n zones in housing. Depending on whether the gathering centres are located on\n one side, on the other, or along the border of territoriality, the degree of\n intimacy of the living space also changes.","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial organization concepts for living spaces with two centres\",\"authors\":\"Djordje Alfirevic, Sanja Simonović-Alfirević\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/spat1942001a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a functional sense, the centre of the living space is a gathering area for\\n its users and for visitors. In most cases, the living area has at least one\\n space towards which its users gravitate daily or occasionally. In situations\\n where there are two or more centres in the living area, their position, size\\n and connection determine the character of the functional organization, and\\n they result from the social needs of the users. This paper analyzes\\n characteristic examples of how dwellings are organized with several\\n gathering centres, drawing out three basic concepts: a) living space with\\n centres grouped in a social zone, b) living space with a flexible centre on\\n the boundary between zones and c) living space with a secondary centre in a\\n private area. On the other hand, attention is drawn to the existence of\\n different boundaries of territoriality (boundaries of ownership, hospitality\\n and intimacy), which determine the domains of social, private and intimate\\n zones in housing. Depending on whether the gathering centres are located on\\n one side, on the other, or along the border of territoriality, the degree of\\n intimacy of the living space also changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spatium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spatium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat1942001a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat1942001a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

从功能意义上讲,生活空间的中心是用户和游客的聚集区。在大多数情况下,生活区至少有一个空间,用户每天或偶尔都会被吸引。在生活区有两个或多个中心的情况下,它们的位置、大小和联系决定了功能组织的性质,它们是用户的社会需求的结果。本文分析了住宅如何由多个聚集中心组织的特征示例,提出了三个基本概念:a)生活空间,中心分组在一个社会区域内,b)生活空间在区域之间的边界上有一个灵活的中心,c)私人区域内有一个次要中心。另一方面,人们注意到存在不同的领土边界(所有权、款待和亲密关系的边界),这些边界决定了住房中社会、私人和亲密区域的范围。根据聚集中心是位于一侧、另一侧还是位于领土边界,生活空间的亲密程度也会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial organization concepts for living spaces with two centres
In a functional sense, the centre of the living space is a gathering area for its users and for visitors. In most cases, the living area has at least one space towards which its users gravitate daily or occasionally. In situations where there are two or more centres in the living area, their position, size and connection determine the character of the functional organization, and they result from the social needs of the users. This paper analyzes characteristic examples of how dwellings are organized with several gathering centres, drawing out three basic concepts: a) living space with centres grouped in a social zone, b) living space with a flexible centre on the boundary between zones and c) living space with a secondary centre in a private area. On the other hand, attention is drawn to the existence of different boundaries of territoriality (boundaries of ownership, hospitality and intimacy), which determine the domains of social, private and intimate zones in housing. Depending on whether the gathering centres are located on one side, on the other, or along the border of territoriality, the degree of intimacy of the living space also changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The first community housing model constructed in Hungary - the collective house in Miskolc Credibility of legalization: Illegally constructed buildings in Serbia Rethinking soviet era mass housing in Kazakhstan Are we discriminating towards guests with disabilities? Accessibility analyses of public restaurants facilities in the Republic of Slovenia The impact of energy improvement measures in single-family residential buildings on air pollution in the city of Uzice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1