宽带成本降低指令:基础设施跨部门监管的法律入门

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Pub Date : 2020-12-03 DOI:10.1177/1783591720977098
C. Ducuing
{"title":"宽带成本降低指令:基础设施跨部门监管的法律入门","authors":"C. Ducuing","doi":"10.1177/1783591720977098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infrastructures have mostly developed and have also been regulated in silo, especially in the liberalization phase. As economic, societal and technological patterns toward convergence of infrastructure sectors can now be observed, how to regulate such phenomena obviously raises many questions. In this context, the cross-sector regulation laid down by the Directive 2014/61/EU on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks constitutes an interesting legal primer in EU law, although little discussed. Six years after the adoption of the Directive, the present paper aims to draw lessons from it, from its transposition and from the related dispute-settlement practice in the Member States, with the perspective of cross-sector regulation. What type of cross-sector regulation does the Directive bring about? What are the factors having an influence on the (im)balance between the sectors and/or sectoral regulations? It seems all the more necessary that the newly appointed European Commission (“EC”) announced its willingness to revise the Directive within the next 5 years. The study of the BCR Directive may also contribute to inform how to regulate the phenomenon of increasing convergence between network industries. The paper refers to “cross-sector regulation” as, broadly, a type of regulation where several sectors, traditionally subject to specific regulations, are brought together, irrespective of the mode of interaction between them. Particularly, “cross-sector regulation” does not assume that the sectors and/or the sectoral regulations would be placed on an equal footing.","PeriodicalId":38329,"journal":{"name":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","volume":"22 1","pages":"3 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1783591720977098","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Broadband Cost Reduction Directive: A legal primer in cross-sector regulation of infrastructures\",\"authors\":\"C. Ducuing\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1783591720977098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Infrastructures have mostly developed and have also been regulated in silo, especially in the liberalization phase. As economic, societal and technological patterns toward convergence of infrastructure sectors can now be observed, how to regulate such phenomena obviously raises many questions. In this context, the cross-sector regulation laid down by the Directive 2014/61/EU on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks constitutes an interesting legal primer in EU law, although little discussed. Six years after the adoption of the Directive, the present paper aims to draw lessons from it, from its transposition and from the related dispute-settlement practice in the Member States, with the perspective of cross-sector regulation. What type of cross-sector regulation does the Directive bring about? What are the factors having an influence on the (im)balance between the sectors and/or sectoral regulations? It seems all the more necessary that the newly appointed European Commission (“EC”) announced its willingness to revise the Directive within the next 5 years. The study of the BCR Directive may also contribute to inform how to regulate the phenomenon of increasing convergence between network industries. The paper refers to “cross-sector regulation” as, broadly, a type of regulation where several sectors, traditionally subject to specific regulations, are brought together, irrespective of the mode of interaction between them. Particularly, “cross-sector regulation” does not assume that the sectors and/or the sectoral regulations would be placed on an equal footing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1783591720977098\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591720977098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591720977098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基础设施大多得到了发展,也受到了孤立的监管,尤其是在自由化阶段。随着经济、社会和技术模式朝着基础设施部门趋同的方向发展,如何监管这些现象显然提出了许多问题。在这种情况下,关于降低部署高速电子通信网络成本的措施的第2014/61/EU号指令制定的跨部门法规是欧盟法律中一个有趣的法律入门,尽管很少讨论。在该指令通过六年后,本文件旨在从跨部门监管的角度,从该指令的转换和成员国的相关争端解决实践中吸取教训。该指令带来了什么类型的跨部门监管?哪些因素对部门和/或部门法规之间的平衡有影响?似乎更有必要的是,新任命的欧盟委员会(“EC”)宣布愿意在未来5年内修订该指令。对BCR指令的研究也可能有助于了解如何监管网络行业之间日益趋同的现象。该文件将“跨部门监管”广义上称为一种监管类型,传统上受特定监管的几个部门被结合在一起,而不考虑它们之间的互动模式。特别是,“跨部门监管”并不意味着各部门和/或部门监管将处于平等地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Broadband Cost Reduction Directive: A legal primer in cross-sector regulation of infrastructures
Infrastructures have mostly developed and have also been regulated in silo, especially in the liberalization phase. As economic, societal and technological patterns toward convergence of infrastructure sectors can now be observed, how to regulate such phenomena obviously raises many questions. In this context, the cross-sector regulation laid down by the Directive 2014/61/EU on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks constitutes an interesting legal primer in EU law, although little discussed. Six years after the adoption of the Directive, the present paper aims to draw lessons from it, from its transposition and from the related dispute-settlement practice in the Member States, with the perspective of cross-sector regulation. What type of cross-sector regulation does the Directive bring about? What are the factors having an influence on the (im)balance between the sectors and/or sectoral regulations? It seems all the more necessary that the newly appointed European Commission (“EC”) announced its willingness to revise the Directive within the next 5 years. The study of the BCR Directive may also contribute to inform how to regulate the phenomenon of increasing convergence between network industries. The paper refers to “cross-sector regulation” as, broadly, a type of regulation where several sectors, traditionally subject to specific regulations, are brought together, irrespective of the mode of interaction between them. Particularly, “cross-sector regulation” does not assume that the sectors and/or the sectoral regulations would be placed on an equal footing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study Legal and ownership unbundling in the Turkish natural gas market: A comparative analysis Network utility price regulation in Australia in the pre-first world war years Canal of Nuck Endometrioma: An Uncommon Site of a Common Pathology. Experimenting with co-ownership of energy storage facilities - A case study of the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1