从有效信息中产生因果关系:既不是因果关系也不是偶然关系?

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Thought-A Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-05-05 DOI:10.1002/THT3.489
Joe E. Dewhurst
{"title":"从有效信息中产生因果关系:既不是因果关系也不是偶然关系?","authors":"Joe E. Dewhurst","doi":"10.1002/THT3.489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past few years have seen several novel information-theoretic measures of causal emergence developed within the scientific community. In this paper I will introduce one such measure, called ‘ effective information ’ , and describe how it is used to argue for causal emergence. In brief, the idea is that certain kinds of complex system are structured such that an intervention characterised at the macro-level will be more informative than one characterised at the micro-level, and that this constitutes a form of causal emergence. Having introduced this proposal, I will then assess the extent to which it is genuinely ‘ causal ’ and/or ‘ emergent ’ , and argue that it supports only an epistemic form of causal emergence that is not as exciting as it first seems.","PeriodicalId":44963,"journal":{"name":"Thought-A Journal of Philosophy","volume":"10 1","pages":"158-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/THT3.489","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal emergence from effective information: Neither causal nor emergent?\",\"authors\":\"Joe E. Dewhurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/THT3.489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The past few years have seen several novel information-theoretic measures of causal emergence developed within the scientific community. In this paper I will introduce one such measure, called ‘ effective information ’ , and describe how it is used to argue for causal emergence. In brief, the idea is that certain kinds of complex system are structured such that an intervention characterised at the macro-level will be more informative than one characterised at the micro-level, and that this constitutes a form of causal emergence. Having introduced this proposal, I will then assess the extent to which it is genuinely ‘ causal ’ and/or ‘ emergent ’ , and argue that it supports only an epistemic form of causal emergence that is not as exciting as it first seems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thought-A Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"158-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/THT3.489\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thought-A Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/THT3.489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thought-A Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/THT3.489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在过去的几年里,科学界发展出了几种新的因果出现的信息论方法。在本文中,我将介绍一种称为“有效信息”的测量方法,并描述如何使用它来论证因果出现。简而言之,这一观点认为,某些复杂系统的结构使得宏观层面的干预比微观层面的干预更能提供信息,这构成了一种因果出现的形式。在介绍了这个提议之后,我将评估它在多大程度上是真正的“因果”和/或“涌现”,并认为它只支持一种认知形式的因果涌现,而这种形式并不像最初看起来那么令人兴奋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal emergence from effective information: Neither causal nor emergent?
The past few years have seen several novel information-theoretic measures of causal emergence developed within the scientific community. In this paper I will introduce one such measure, called ‘ effective information ’ , and describe how it is used to argue for causal emergence. In brief, the idea is that certain kinds of complex system are structured such that an intervention characterised at the macro-level will be more informative than one characterised at the micro-level, and that this constitutes a form of causal emergence. Having introduced this proposal, I will then assess the extent to which it is genuinely ‘ causal ’ and/or ‘ emergent ’ , and argue that it supports only an epistemic form of causal emergence that is not as exciting as it first seems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Thought: A Journal of Philosophy is dedicated to the publication of short (of less than 4500 words), original, philosophical papers in the following areas: Logic, Philosophy of Maths, Philosophy of Mind, Epistemology, Philosophy of Language, Metaphysics, and Value Theory. All published papers will be analytic in style. We intend that readers of Thought will be exposed to the most central and significant issues and positions in contemporary philosophy that fall under its remit. We will publish only papers that exemplify the highest standard of clarity. Thought aims to give a response to all authors within eight weeks of submission. Thought employs a triple-blind review system: the author''s identity is not revealed to the editors and referees, and the referee''s identity is not revealed to the author. Every submitted paper is appraised by the Subject Editor of the relevant subject area. Papers that pass to the editors are read by at least two experts in the relevant subject area.
期刊最新文献
Subset Realization and the Entailment Problem in advance The Co-Intension Problem in advance Removing Realizers in advance Editorial Note Measurement and desert: Why grades cannot be deserved
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1