Shivam Singh Chouhan , Ankit Kathuria , Chalumuri Ravi Sekhar
{"title":"摩托车骑手行为问卷作为车祸预测因子:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Shivam Singh Chouhan , Ankit Kathuria , Chalumuri Ravi Sekhar","doi":"10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of the present review was to analyze the overall predictive ability of the Motorcycle Rider Behaviour Questionnaire (MRBQ) in regard to self-reported crashes. Therefore, the study examined the relationship between MRBQ factors (traffic error, control error, speed violation, and usage of safety equipment) and self-reported crashes using meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to select published studies, and was undertaken in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. Articles were required to focus on examine the relationship between riding behaviour and crash involvement using MRBQ. The random effect model of meta-analysis observed a small but significant effect of the factor “speed violation” on crashes (<em>r</em> = 0.11 [0.06, 0.15], <em>p</em> < 0.001). Further, age (<em>r</em> = 0.06 [−0.09, 0.2], p < 0.001) and riding experience (<em>r</em> = −0.4 [−0.84, 0.37], p < 0.001) were observed as significant predictors of crashes. The moderator analysis revealed only one dichotomous moderator, i.e., rider type. Overall, meta-analysis results revealed that the MRBQ has a lower predictive ability for crashes. Future studies should follow large sample validation with recorded crashes or by identifying alternate variables for crashes as a criterion. The implications of present study lie in providing a focused and quantitative analysis of which specific MRBQ factor is the most and least impactful. Furthermore, because the study focused on the predictive validity of MRBQ in relation to crashes, it provides a reference for additional MRBQ implications (e.g., relationship with psychological measures) to further investigate MRBQ's applicability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47059,"journal":{"name":"IATSS Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The motorcycle rider behaviour questionnaire as a predictor of crashes: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shivam Singh Chouhan , Ankit Kathuria , Chalumuri Ravi Sekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of the present review was to analyze the overall predictive ability of the Motorcycle Rider Behaviour Questionnaire (MRBQ) in regard to self-reported crashes. Therefore, the study examined the relationship between MRBQ factors (traffic error, control error, speed violation, and usage of safety equipment) and self-reported crashes using meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to select published studies, and was undertaken in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. Articles were required to focus on examine the relationship between riding behaviour and crash involvement using MRBQ. The random effect model of meta-analysis observed a small but significant effect of the factor “speed violation” on crashes (<em>r</em> = 0.11 [0.06, 0.15], <em>p</em> < 0.001). Further, age (<em>r</em> = 0.06 [−0.09, 0.2], p < 0.001) and riding experience (<em>r</em> = −0.4 [−0.84, 0.37], p < 0.001) were observed as significant predictors of crashes. The moderator analysis revealed only one dichotomous moderator, i.e., rider type. Overall, meta-analysis results revealed that the MRBQ has a lower predictive ability for crashes. Future studies should follow large sample validation with recorded crashes or by identifying alternate variables for crashes as a criterion. The implications of present study lie in providing a focused and quantitative analysis of which specific MRBQ factor is the most and least impactful. Furthermore, because the study focused on the predictive validity of MRBQ in relation to crashes, it provides a reference for additional MRBQ implications (e.g., relationship with psychological measures) to further investigate MRBQ's applicability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IATSS Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IATSS Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111223000043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IATSS Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111223000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本综述的目的是分析摩托车骑手行为问卷(MRBQ)在自我报告碰撞方面的整体预测能力。因此,本研究采用元分析的方法考察了MRBQ因素(交通错误、控制错误、超速违规和安全设备的使用)与自我报告的碰撞之间的关系。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南用于选择已发表的研究,并在三个数据库中进行:Google Scholar, PubMed和Web of Science。文章被要求集中于使用MRBQ检查骑行行为和碰撞参与之间的关系。meta分析的随机效应模型观察到“超速”因素对交通事故的影响虽小但显著(r = 0.11 [0.06, 0.15], p <0.001)。此外,年龄(r = 0.06 [- 0.09, 0.2], p <0.001)和骑行经验(r = - 0.4 [- 0.84, 0.37], p <0.001)被观察为碰撞的重要预测因子。调节因子分析显示只有一个二元调节因子,即骑手类型。总体而言,meta分析结果显示,MRBQ对车祸的预测能力较低。未来的研究应遵循大样本验证记录的崩溃或通过确定替代变量的崩溃作为标准。本研究的意义在于对哪些特定的MRBQ因素影响最大和影响最小进行了集中和定量的分析。此外,由于本研究的重点是MRBQ对事故的预测效度,因此为进一步研究MRBQ的适用性提供了参考,例如与心理测量的关系。
The motorcycle rider behaviour questionnaire as a predictor of crashes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
The aim of the present review was to analyze the overall predictive ability of the Motorcycle Rider Behaviour Questionnaire (MRBQ) in regard to self-reported crashes. Therefore, the study examined the relationship between MRBQ factors (traffic error, control error, speed violation, and usage of safety equipment) and self-reported crashes using meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to select published studies, and was undertaken in three databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. Articles were required to focus on examine the relationship between riding behaviour and crash involvement using MRBQ. The random effect model of meta-analysis observed a small but significant effect of the factor “speed violation” on crashes (r = 0.11 [0.06, 0.15], p < 0.001). Further, age (r = 0.06 [−0.09, 0.2], p < 0.001) and riding experience (r = −0.4 [−0.84, 0.37], p < 0.001) were observed as significant predictors of crashes. The moderator analysis revealed only one dichotomous moderator, i.e., rider type. Overall, meta-analysis results revealed that the MRBQ has a lower predictive ability for crashes. Future studies should follow large sample validation with recorded crashes or by identifying alternate variables for crashes as a criterion. The implications of present study lie in providing a focused and quantitative analysis of which specific MRBQ factor is the most and least impactful. Furthermore, because the study focused on the predictive validity of MRBQ in relation to crashes, it provides a reference for additional MRBQ implications (e.g., relationship with psychological measures) to further investigate MRBQ's applicability.
期刊介绍:
First published in 1977 as an international journal sponsored by the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, IATSS Research has contributed to the dissemination of interdisciplinary wisdom on ideal mobility, particularly in Asia. IATSS Research is an international refereed journal providing a platform for the exchange of scientific findings on transportation and safety across a wide range of academic fields, with particular emphasis on the links between scientific findings and practice in society and cultural contexts. IATSS Research welcomes submission of original research articles and reviews that satisfy the following conditions: 1.Relevant to transportation and safety, and the multiple impacts of transportation systems on security, human health, and the environment. 2.Contains important policy and practical implications based on scientific evidence in the applicable academic field. In addition to welcoming general submissions, IATSS Research occasionally plans and publishes special feature sections and special issues composed of invited articles addressing specific topics.