重新考虑再婚:斯坦利·卡维尔与体裁的变迁

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2023.2246350
Kyle Barrowman
{"title":"重新考虑再婚:斯坦利·卡维尔与体裁的变迁","authors":"Kyle Barrowman","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2023.2246350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, Stanley Cavell has become one of the canonical reference points for film scholars. In particular, his work on ‘comedies of remarriage’ has become one of the most fertile arenas of contemporary scholarship in film studies. However, Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy has rarely been subjected to criticism. For the most part, scholars interested in Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy have either sought to elaborate on his readings of the seven principal films which for him make up the core of the genre, or they have sought to expand the genre by incorporating additional classical or contemporary Hollywood romantic comedies. In this article, I reconsider Cavell’s canonical work on the subject, and critique and provide alternatives to what are to my mind the most pressing problems in Cavell’s conception of remarriage comedy, problems which fall into three broad categories: theoretical problems, historical problems, and critical problems. In so doing, I hope to provide better theoretical models, broader historical understanding, and more nuanced criticism vis-à-vis the genre of remarriage comedy in and beyond classical Hollywood cinema.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering remarriage: Stanley Cavell and the vicissitudes of genre\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Barrowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17400309.2023.2246350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent years, Stanley Cavell has become one of the canonical reference points for film scholars. In particular, his work on ‘comedies of remarriage’ has become one of the most fertile arenas of contemporary scholarship in film studies. However, Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy has rarely been subjected to criticism. For the most part, scholars interested in Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy have either sought to elaborate on his readings of the seven principal films which for him make up the core of the genre, or they have sought to expand the genre by incorporating additional classical or contemporary Hollywood romantic comedies. In this article, I reconsider Cavell’s canonical work on the subject, and critique and provide alternatives to what are to my mind the most pressing problems in Cavell’s conception of remarriage comedy, problems which fall into three broad categories: theoretical problems, historical problems, and critical problems. In so doing, I hope to provide better theoretical models, broader historical understanding, and more nuanced criticism vis-à-vis the genre of remarriage comedy in and beyond classical Hollywood cinema.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Film and Television Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Film and Television Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2246350\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2246350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconsidering remarriage: Stanley Cavell and the vicissitudes of genre
ABSTRACT In recent years, Stanley Cavell has become one of the canonical reference points for film scholars. In particular, his work on ‘comedies of remarriage’ has become one of the most fertile arenas of contemporary scholarship in film studies. However, Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy has rarely been subjected to criticism. For the most part, scholars interested in Cavell’s work on remarriage comedy have either sought to elaborate on his readings of the seven principal films which for him make up the core of the genre, or they have sought to expand the genre by incorporating additional classical or contemporary Hollywood romantic comedies. In this article, I reconsider Cavell’s canonical work on the subject, and critique and provide alternatives to what are to my mind the most pressing problems in Cavell’s conception of remarriage comedy, problems which fall into three broad categories: theoretical problems, historical problems, and critical problems. In so doing, I hope to provide better theoretical models, broader historical understanding, and more nuanced criticism vis-à-vis the genre of remarriage comedy in and beyond classical Hollywood cinema.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Flowers, concrete, water: care and precarity in Tsai Ming-liang’s I Don’t Want to Sleep Alone (2006) The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1