踩鹅?从私法角度看匈牙利公共行政合同的概念

T. Papp
{"title":"踩鹅?从私法角度看匈牙利公共行政合同的概念","authors":"T. Papp","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author addresses questions raised in the professional literature of public law\n(e.g.: the applicability of the Hungarian Civil Code to public law contracts), alongside the\ncontradictions (e.g.: there isn’t a unified set of denotations and categories) and problems\nincluded therein, and the one-sidedness thereof (the disregarding of the respective works of\nprivate law). We analyze the selected material by concisely explaining the relation between\npublic law and private law in Hungary. The author pays special attention to the Hungarian\npublic law definitions as well as the contract-types with their characteristics, and finally,\nconclusions are drawn, and compatible perspectives are proposed.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goose-stepping? The concept of the Hungarian public administration\\ncontract from a private law point of view\",\"authors\":\"T. Papp\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author addresses questions raised in the professional literature of public law\\n(e.g.: the applicability of the Hungarian Civil Code to public law contracts), alongside the\\ncontradictions (e.g.: there isn’t a unified set of denotations and categories) and problems\\nincluded therein, and the one-sidedness thereof (the disregarding of the respective works of\\nprivate law). We analyze the selected material by concisely explaining the relation between\\npublic law and private law in Hungary. The author pays special attention to the Hungarian\\npublic law definitions as well as the contract-types with their characteristics, and finally,\\nconclusions are drawn, and compatible perspectives are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者解决了公法专业文献中提出的问题(例如;(匈牙利民法典对公法合同的适用性),以及其中包含的矛盾(例如:没有统一的外延和类别)和问题,以及其中的片面性(无视各自的私法作品)。本文通过对匈牙利公法与私法关系的简要解释,对所选材料进行分析。作者特别关注匈牙利公法的定义以及合同类型及其特点,最后得出结论,并提出相容的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Goose-stepping? The concept of the Hungarian public administration contract from a private law point of view
The author addresses questions raised in the professional literature of public law (e.g.: the applicability of the Hungarian Civil Code to public law contracts), alongside the contradictions (e.g.: there isn’t a unified set of denotations and categories) and problems included therein, and the one-sidedness thereof (the disregarding of the respective works of private law). We analyze the selected material by concisely explaining the relation between public law and private law in Hungary. The author pays special attention to the Hungarian public law definitions as well as the contract-types with their characteristics, and finally, conclusions are drawn, and compatible perspectives are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1