克罗地亚的反蒙面者是谁?克罗地亚新冠肺炎大流行期间的抗肿瘤反应应用

Q3 Social Sciences Sociologija i Prostor Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.5673/SIP.59.0.7
Branko Ančić, Dražen Cepić
{"title":"克罗地亚的反蒙面者是谁?克罗地亚新冠肺炎大流行期间的抗肿瘤反应应用","authors":"Branko Ančić, Dražen Cepić","doi":"10.5673/SIP.59.0.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the very beginning of the COVID-19 disease pandemic there have been alternative nar-ratives, not only in virtual spaces, but also as part of official explanations given by social actors relevant for managing the pandemic crisis. As a reaction to the disease spread, authorities eve-rywhere introduced quarantine measures, obligatory adherence to epidemiological measures, and economic lockdown, which led to protests against the measures in a number of cities worldwide, such as Berlin, London, Brussels, Dublin, Madrid, Paris, Rotter¬dam, even Zagreb (so-called anti-mask protests) during the summer and throughout the autumn and winter of 2020. In this paper, the notion of anti-mask attitude is viewed as a social phenomenon imply-ing not only a mere fact of not wearing a mask as an act of violating epidemiological measures, but also the reaction of people during the pandemic. This reaction is comprised of the percep-tion diminishing the danger of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or even denying its existence, along with the assessment that the imposed epidemiological measures are oppressive (too stringent). The theoretical framework of the paper is based on literature on conspiracy theories as an overarch-ing concept that helps understand the anti-mask movements. In the analysis, the data gathered by a questionnaire survey (CATI technique) during August, September and October 2020 on a nationally representative sample (N=1512) were used. In the paper, some determinants of inclination towards conspiracy theories were analysed as possible explanatory determinants of the anti-masker social reaction. The analysis pointed to two aspects appearing as key for understanding the anti-masker social reaction – existential conditions and the changes of these conditions due to the pandemic, and trust in relevant social actors’ / institutions’ management of the COVID-19 disease induced crises.","PeriodicalId":39267,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija i Prostor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tko su antimaskeri u Hrvatskoj? Prilog istraživanju antimaskerske reakcije tijekom pandemije bolesti COVID-19 u Hrvatskoj\",\"authors\":\"Branko Ančić, Dražen Cepić\",\"doi\":\"10.5673/SIP.59.0.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the very beginning of the COVID-19 disease pandemic there have been alternative nar-ratives, not only in virtual spaces, but also as part of official explanations given by social actors relevant for managing the pandemic crisis. As a reaction to the disease spread, authorities eve-rywhere introduced quarantine measures, obligatory adherence to epidemiological measures, and economic lockdown, which led to protests against the measures in a number of cities worldwide, such as Berlin, London, Brussels, Dublin, Madrid, Paris, Rotter¬dam, even Zagreb (so-called anti-mask protests) during the summer and throughout the autumn and winter of 2020. In this paper, the notion of anti-mask attitude is viewed as a social phenomenon imply-ing not only a mere fact of not wearing a mask as an act of violating epidemiological measures, but also the reaction of people during the pandemic. This reaction is comprised of the percep-tion diminishing the danger of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or even denying its existence, along with the assessment that the imposed epidemiological measures are oppressive (too stringent). The theoretical framework of the paper is based on literature on conspiracy theories as an overarch-ing concept that helps understand the anti-mask movements. In the analysis, the data gathered by a questionnaire survey (CATI technique) during August, September and October 2020 on a nationally representative sample (N=1512) were used. In the paper, some determinants of inclination towards conspiracy theories were analysed as possible explanatory determinants of the anti-masker social reaction. The analysis pointed to two aspects appearing as key for understanding the anti-masker social reaction – existential conditions and the changes of these conditions due to the pandemic, and trust in relevant social actors’ / institutions’ management of the COVID-19 disease induced crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologija i Prostor\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologija i Prostor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5673/SIP.59.0.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija i Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5673/SIP.59.0.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

自新冠肺炎疾病大流行一开始,就有了替代性药物,不仅在虚拟空间中,而且作为与管理大流行危机相关的社会行为者给出的官方解释的一部分。作为对疾病传播的反应,当局采取了隔离措施、强制遵守流行病学措施和经济封锁,这导致了全球多个城市对这些措施的抗议,如柏林、伦敦、布鲁塞尔、都柏林、马德里、巴黎、罗特达姆、,甚至萨格勒布(所谓的反口罩抗议)在2020年夏天和整个秋冬。在本文中,反口罩态度的概念被视为一种社会现象,不仅意味着不戴口罩是违反流行病学措施的行为,还意味着人们在疫情期间的反应。这种反应包括减少严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型病毒的危险,甚至否认其存在,以及评估所实施的流行病学措施是压迫性的(过于严格)。这篇论文的理论框架是基于阴谋论的文献,阴谋论是一个有助于理解反口罩运动的重要概念。在分析中,使用了2020年8月、9月和10月期间通过问卷调查(CATI技术)收集的全国代表性样本(N=1512)的数据。本文分析了倾向于阴谋论的一些决定因素,作为反蒙面者社会反应的可能解释性决定因素。分析指出,两个方面似乎是理解反蒙面者社会反应的关键——生存条件和这些条件因大流行而发生的变化,以及对相关社会行为者/机构对新冠肺炎疾病引发危机的管理的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tko su antimaskeri u Hrvatskoj? Prilog istraživanju antimaskerske reakcije tijekom pandemije bolesti COVID-19 u Hrvatskoj
Since the very beginning of the COVID-19 disease pandemic there have been alternative nar-ratives, not only in virtual spaces, but also as part of official explanations given by social actors relevant for managing the pandemic crisis. As a reaction to the disease spread, authorities eve-rywhere introduced quarantine measures, obligatory adherence to epidemiological measures, and economic lockdown, which led to protests against the measures in a number of cities worldwide, such as Berlin, London, Brussels, Dublin, Madrid, Paris, Rotter¬dam, even Zagreb (so-called anti-mask protests) during the summer and throughout the autumn and winter of 2020. In this paper, the notion of anti-mask attitude is viewed as a social phenomenon imply-ing not only a mere fact of not wearing a mask as an act of violating epidemiological measures, but also the reaction of people during the pandemic. This reaction is comprised of the percep-tion diminishing the danger of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or even denying its existence, along with the assessment that the imposed epidemiological measures are oppressive (too stringent). The theoretical framework of the paper is based on literature on conspiracy theories as an overarch-ing concept that helps understand the anti-mask movements. In the analysis, the data gathered by a questionnaire survey (CATI technique) during August, September and October 2020 on a nationally representative sample (N=1512) were used. In the paper, some determinants of inclination towards conspiracy theories were analysed as possible explanatory determinants of the anti-masker social reaction. The analysis pointed to two aspects appearing as key for understanding the anti-masker social reaction – existential conditions and the changes of these conditions due to the pandemic, and trust in relevant social actors’ / institutions’ management of the COVID-19 disease induced crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija i Prostor
Sociologija i Prostor Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
When Worlds Collide: Sociality Between Physical and Cyberspace during the COVID-19 Pandemic Doprinos civilnog društva kvaliteti života osoba u starijoj životnoj dobi u gradu Zagrebu „Lijepo je doći tu na par dana, ali je živjeti teško…“ – razvojni potencijali i prepreke ruralnih naselja Gorskoga kotara i sjevernodalmatinskih otoka iz perspektive stanovnika Networking Through Persistence: Case Study on the Position and Development of the Clubture Network Slobodno vrijeme i međukulturna osjetljivost studenata učiteljskih studija
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1