分析学入门课程中多项选择题写作实践指南

Q3 Social Sciences INFORMS Transactions on Education Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1287/ited.2022.0274
S. Stevens, Susan W. Palocsay, Luis J. Novoa
{"title":"分析学入门课程中多项选择题写作实践指南","authors":"S. Stevens, Susan W. Palocsay, Luis J. Novoa","doi":"10.1287/ited.2022.0274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test writing is a fundamental component of teaching. With increasing pressure to teach larger groups of students, conduct formal assessment of learning outcomes, and offer online and hybrid classes, there is a need for alternatives to constructed response problem-solving test questions. We believe that appropriate use of multiple-choice (MC) questions can alleviate some of these pressures. However, the results will only be acceptable to dedicated faculty if these questions are well written and effective in measuring student learning. In this article, we propose a structured framework consisting of six design principles that serve as a guide for writing MC items that promote higher-order thinking through the use of scenario-based and multistep problems. Then we demonstrate how to apply these principles to develop high-quality test questions in MC format for introductory analytics courses in statistics or operations research/management science.","PeriodicalId":37137,"journal":{"name":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Guidance for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in Introductory Analytics Courses\",\"authors\":\"S. Stevens, Susan W. Palocsay, Luis J. Novoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/ited.2022.0274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test writing is a fundamental component of teaching. With increasing pressure to teach larger groups of students, conduct formal assessment of learning outcomes, and offer online and hybrid classes, there is a need for alternatives to constructed response problem-solving test questions. We believe that appropriate use of multiple-choice (MC) questions can alleviate some of these pressures. However, the results will only be acceptable to dedicated faculty if these questions are well written and effective in measuring student learning. In this article, we propose a structured framework consisting of six design principles that serve as a guide for writing MC items that promote higher-order thinking through the use of scenario-based and multistep problems. Then we demonstrate how to apply these principles to develop high-quality test questions in MC format for introductory analytics courses in statistics or operations research/management science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INFORMS Transactions on Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INFORMS Transactions on Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

测试写作是教学的一个基本组成部分。随着教授更多学生群体、对学习结果进行正式评估以及提供在线和混合课程的压力越来越大,需要替代构建反应解决问题的测试问题。我们相信,适当使用多项选择题可以缓解其中的一些压力。然而,只有当这些问题写得很好并且在衡量学生学习方面有效时,结果才会被敬业的教师所接受。在本文中,我们提出了一个由六个设计原则组成的结构化框架,作为编写MC项目的指南,这些项目通过使用基于场景和多步骤的问题来促进高阶思维。然后,我们展示了如何应用这些原则,为统计学或运筹学/管理科学的入门分析课程开发MC格式的高质量试题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practical Guidance for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in Introductory Analytics Courses
Test writing is a fundamental component of teaching. With increasing pressure to teach larger groups of students, conduct formal assessment of learning outcomes, and offer online and hybrid classes, there is a need for alternatives to constructed response problem-solving test questions. We believe that appropriate use of multiple-choice (MC) questions can alleviate some of these pressures. However, the results will only be acceptable to dedicated faculty if these questions are well written and effective in measuring student learning. In this article, we propose a structured framework consisting of six design principles that serve as a guide for writing MC items that promote higher-order thinking through the use of scenario-based and multistep problems. Then we demonstrate how to apply these principles to develop high-quality test questions in MC format for introductory analytics courses in statistics or operations research/management science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
INFORMS Transactions on Education
INFORMS Transactions on Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adventures with Grading Contracts in Operations Classes: A Preliminary Investigation Case Article–Forecasting at FoodMart: A Case on Cultural Diversity in Supply Chain Management Case Article—Three Mountain Communications: Fairness Considerations for Workplace Task Allocation Case—Three Mountain Communications: Considerations for Workplace Task Allocation Case Article—Budding with ERP: Information and Operations Management Challenges in a Nascent Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1