动荡时期与科学研究的发展文章,1735-1835

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Historical Pragmatics Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.1075/jhp.18010.ban
David Banks
{"title":"动荡时期与科学研究的发展文章,1735-1835","authors":"David Banks","doi":"10.1075/jhp.18010.ban","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The results of a previous study (Banks 2018) suggest that the\n development of scientific writing is more conservative in times of great turbulence. In an attempt to verify this, samples were\n taken from the Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences and the Philosophical Transactions for the\n years 1735, 1785 and 1835. The development over the years 1735 to 1785 was compared to that between 1785 and 1835. Analysis of the\n grammatical functions and semantic categories of themes and of process types indicates that there is some evidence in favour of\n the conjecture that scientific writers are more conservative in times of turbulence. Whilst this is not conclusive, it suggests\n that further research would be fruitful.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turbulent periods and the development of the scientific research article, 1735–1835\",\"authors\":\"David Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.18010.ban\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The results of a previous study (Banks 2018) suggest that the\\n development of scientific writing is more conservative in times of great turbulence. In an attempt to verify this, samples were\\n taken from the Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences and the Philosophical Transactions for the\\n years 1735, 1785 and 1835. The development over the years 1735 to 1785 was compared to that between 1785 and 1835. Analysis of the\\n grammatical functions and semantic categories of themes and of process types indicates that there is some evidence in favour of\\n the conjecture that scientific writers are more conservative in times of turbulence. Whilst this is not conclusive, it suggests\\n that further research would be fruitful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18010.ban\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18010.ban","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

之前的一项研究(Banks 2018)的结果表明,在大动荡时期,科学写作的发展更加保守。为了验证这一点,从1735年、1785年和1835年的科学院和哲学汇刊中采集了样本。将1735年至1785年的发展与1785年至1835年间的发展进行了比较。对主题和过程类型的语法功能和语义类别的分析表明,有一些证据支持科学作家在动荡时期更保守的猜测。虽然这不是决定性的,但它表明进一步的研究将是富有成果的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Turbulent periods and the development of the scientific research article, 1735–1835
The results of a previous study (Banks 2018) suggest that the development of scientific writing is more conservative in times of great turbulence. In an attempt to verify this, samples were taken from the Mémoires de l’Académie des Sciences and the Philosophical Transactions for the years 1735, 1785 and 1835. The development over the years 1735 to 1785 was compared to that between 1785 and 1835. Analysis of the grammatical functions and semantic categories of themes and of process types indicates that there is some evidence in favour of the conjecture that scientific writers are more conservative in times of turbulence. Whilst this is not conclusive, it suggests that further research would be fruitful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.
期刊最新文献
Women’s voices in the public sphere Democratisation Colloquialisation A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard Speaking for the downtrodden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1