董事会中民族-种族代表性的现状:比较分析

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2023.09.001
Dimitria Groutsis
{"title":"董事会中民族-种族代表性的现状:比较分析","authors":"Dimitria Groutsis","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Progress on ethno-racial diversity on boards in Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia has been at best variable. The map of ethno-racial diversity in the top ten largest listed companies across these regions provides comparative evidence of varying degrees of weak outcomes on this front, with the profile of Australian boards being the least favourable. In examining the reality of diversity on a sample of boards, we delve deeper into why the barriers persist despite internal-facing diversity and inclusion policies and external facing environmental, social, governance and government-led policies. This study proposes that governance and regulatory arrangements shape access opportunities for ethno-racial minorities on boards. Notwithstanding the varieties of such arrangements across the three regions, the reasons underscoring the lack of board diversity overall remains opaque. We offer fresh empirical evidence surrounding the limited ethno-racial diversity on boards through a cross-regional comparison and provide lessons and insights for both scholars and practitioners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 3","pages":"Pages 281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001111/pdfft?md5=5d16f4c4c952db553972481ec17a0419&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237323001111-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of play of ethno-racial representation on boards: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dimitria Groutsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emj.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Progress on ethno-racial diversity on boards in Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia has been at best variable. The map of ethno-racial diversity in the top ten largest listed companies across these regions provides comparative evidence of varying degrees of weak outcomes on this front, with the profile of Australian boards being the least favourable. In examining the reality of diversity on a sample of boards, we delve deeper into why the barriers persist despite internal-facing diversity and inclusion policies and external facing environmental, social, governance and government-led policies. This study proposes that governance and regulatory arrangements shape access opportunities for ethno-racial minorities on boards. Notwithstanding the varieties of such arrangements across the three regions, the reasons underscoring the lack of board diversity overall remains opaque. We offer fresh empirical evidence surrounding the limited ethno-racial diversity on boards through a cross-regional comparison and provide lessons and insights for both scholars and practitioners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 281-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001111/pdfft?md5=5d16f4c4c952db553972481ec17a0419&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237323001111-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲、英国和澳大利亚在董事会种族多样性方面的进展充其量也就是参差不齐。这些地区前十大上市公司的民族-种族多样性分布图提供了比较证据,表明在这方面取得了不同程度的薄弱成果,其中澳大利亚董事会的情况最不理想。在对董事会多样性的现实情况进行抽样调查的过程中,我们深入探讨了为什么尽管有面向内部的多样性和包容性政策,以及面向外部的环境、社会、治理和政府主导政策,障碍依然存在。本研究认为,治理和监管安排决定了少数族裔进入董事会的机会。尽管三个地区的此类安排各不相同,但董事会整体缺乏多样性的原因仍不明确。通过跨地区比较,我们提供了有关董事会中种族多样性有限的新经验证据,并为学者和从业人员提供了教训和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The state of play of ethno-racial representation on boards: A comparative analysis

Progress on ethno-racial diversity on boards in Europe, the United Kingdom and Australia has been at best variable. The map of ethno-racial diversity in the top ten largest listed companies across these regions provides comparative evidence of varying degrees of weak outcomes on this front, with the profile of Australian boards being the least favourable. In examining the reality of diversity on a sample of boards, we delve deeper into why the barriers persist despite internal-facing diversity and inclusion policies and external facing environmental, social, governance and government-led policies. This study proposes that governance and regulatory arrangements shape access opportunities for ethno-racial minorities on boards. Notwithstanding the varieties of such arrangements across the three regions, the reasons underscoring the lack of board diversity overall remains opaque. We offer fresh empirical evidence surrounding the limited ethno-racial diversity on boards through a cross-regional comparison and provide lessons and insights for both scholars and practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The need to belong: Relational coping strategies in the face of coworker envy Decomposing profile-to-role configurations in R&D-focused entrepreneurial teams Leadership identity construction in a hybrid medical context: ‘Claimed’ but not ‘granted’ Leader's relational power and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of perceived organizational support for creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1