英语学习进展:挑战还是机遇?

IF 0.1 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Matters Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.18296/CM.0046
Judith Anthony
{"title":"英语学习进展:挑战还是机遇?","authors":"Judith Anthony","doi":"10.18296/CM.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an overview and critical analysis of The English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP) (Ministry of Education, 2008). Identifying main themes through critical policy analysis, this review seeks to place ELLP in context through a comparison with The English Language Learning Framework: Draft (Ministry of Education, 2005) and English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP ) Pathway Years 1–8 (Ministry of Education, 2020a). Within this review, the structure of ELLP is explored along with key ideas and claims. It is argued that there are both challenges and opportunities in ELLP. Finally, the key issues are summarised and suggestions are made for future research.","PeriodicalId":37874,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Matters","volume":"16 1","pages":"21-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP): Challenge or opportunity?\",\"authors\":\"Judith Anthony\",\"doi\":\"10.18296/CM.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides an overview and critical analysis of The English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP) (Ministry of Education, 2008). Identifying main themes through critical policy analysis, this review seeks to place ELLP in context through a comparison with The English Language Learning Framework: Draft (Ministry of Education, 2005) and English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP ) Pathway Years 1–8 (Ministry of Education, 2020a). Within this review, the structure of ELLP is explored along with key ideas and claims. It is argued that there are both challenges and opportunities in ELLP. Finally, the key issues are summarised and suggestions are made for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Matters\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"21-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18296/CM.0046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Matters","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18296/CM.0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对《英语学习进展》(教育部,2008)进行了综述和批判性分析。通过批判性政策分析确定主要主题,本综述试图通过与《英语学习框架:草案》(教育部,2005年)和《英语学习进展(ELLP)途径1-8年》(教育部将,2020a)的比较,将ELLP置于背景中。在这篇综述中,对ELLP的结构以及关键思想和主张进行了探讨。有人认为,ELLP既有挑战,也有机遇。最后,对关键问题进行了总结,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP): Challenge or opportunity?
This article provides an overview and critical analysis of The English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP) (Ministry of Education, 2008). Identifying main themes through critical policy analysis, this review seeks to place ELLP in context through a comparison with The English Language Learning Framework: Draft (Ministry of Education, 2005) and English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP ) Pathway Years 1–8 (Ministry of Education, 2020a). Within this review, the structure of ELLP is explored along with key ideas and claims. It is argued that there are both challenges and opportunities in ELLP. Finally, the key issues are summarised and suggestions are made for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Matters
Curriculum Matters Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Published annually, this peer-reviewed journal provides an avenue for discussion, commentary and information about curriculum. The full archive of back issues is available.
期刊最新文献
Editorial An evidence-based approach to secondary school science: Online citizen science and the science capabilities Korean students’ transnational literacy and social networks in a business college Benefits of poetry: An argument for making poetry a required course for EFL literature majors Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1