理解社会分层:能源不公平的案例

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS Forum for Social Economics Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.1080/07360932.2023.2191294
Lynne Chester, R. McMaster
{"title":"理解社会分层:能源不公平的案例","authors":"Lynne Chester, R. McMaster","doi":"10.1080/07360932.2023.2191294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The continual restructuring of energy systems, around the world, has generated widespread inequities—manifest as profound inequalities and hardship—across the energy continuum. These inequities include: energy unaffordability; access barriers like price or artefacts to utilise the services provided by energy for work and social practices; ‘sacrifice zones’ for new production sites with health, quality of life, and mortality impacts; and, diminished or absent participatory opportunity in production and regulatory decision-making. Fundamental to reaching solutions for the eradication of energy injustices, an exposition is required, we suggest, of the relationships between energy (in)justice, social justice, and inequality. To this end, we investigate two approaches to understanding injustice and inequality—Nancy Fraser’s meta-(in)justice and Stratification Economics. We conclude that the social stratification exhibited through energy injustices, beyond the economic domain, demands solutions that do not replicate the contemporary neoliberal model privileging the private (economic) spheres of power in our societies.","PeriodicalId":42478,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Social Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Social Stratification: The Case of Energy Injustice\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Chester, R. McMaster\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07360932.2023.2191294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The continual restructuring of energy systems, around the world, has generated widespread inequities—manifest as profound inequalities and hardship—across the energy continuum. These inequities include: energy unaffordability; access barriers like price or artefacts to utilise the services provided by energy for work and social practices; ‘sacrifice zones’ for new production sites with health, quality of life, and mortality impacts; and, diminished or absent participatory opportunity in production and regulatory decision-making. Fundamental to reaching solutions for the eradication of energy injustices, an exposition is required, we suggest, of the relationships between energy (in)justice, social justice, and inequality. To this end, we investigate two approaches to understanding injustice and inequality—Nancy Fraser’s meta-(in)justice and Stratification Economics. We conclude that the social stratification exhibited through energy injustices, beyond the economic domain, demands solutions that do not replicate the contemporary neoliberal model privileging the private (economic) spheres of power in our societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum for Social Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum for Social Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2023.2191294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum for Social Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2023.2191294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界范围内,能源系统的持续重组已经产生了广泛的不平等——表现为深刻的不平等和困难——跨越能源连续体。这些不平等包括:能源负担不起;利用能源提供的服务进行工作和社会实践的价格或人工制品等准入障碍;对健康、生活质量和死亡率有影响的新生产基地的“牺牲区”;此外,生产和监管决策中的参与性机会减少或缺失。我们认为,要解决能源不公平的根本问题,就需要阐述能源公平、社会公平和不平等之间的关系。为此,我们研究了理解不公正和不平等的两种方法——南希·弗雷泽的元正义和分层经济学。我们的结论是,超越经济领域的能源不公正所表现出的社会分层,要求解决方案不复制当代新自由主义模式,即在我们的社会中为私人(经济)权力领域提供特权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Social Stratification: The Case of Energy Injustice
Abstract The continual restructuring of energy systems, around the world, has generated widespread inequities—manifest as profound inequalities and hardship—across the energy continuum. These inequities include: energy unaffordability; access barriers like price or artefacts to utilise the services provided by energy for work and social practices; ‘sacrifice zones’ for new production sites with health, quality of life, and mortality impacts; and, diminished or absent participatory opportunity in production and regulatory decision-making. Fundamental to reaching solutions for the eradication of energy injustices, an exposition is required, we suggest, of the relationships between energy (in)justice, social justice, and inequality. To this end, we investigate two approaches to understanding injustice and inequality—Nancy Fraser’s meta-(in)justice and Stratification Economics. We conclude that the social stratification exhibited through energy injustices, beyond the economic domain, demands solutions that do not replicate the contemporary neoliberal model privileging the private (economic) spheres of power in our societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The European Economic Transition before, during, and after the Pandemic through the War in Ukraine International Organizations and Gender Parity in Education: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)1 The Euro-Area Crisis and the Monetary Policy Response of the ECB: A Critical Investigation and Some Reform Proposals The Travels of the Washington Consensus: From the Global Financial Crisis to the Greek Financial Crisis EU Agricultural and Rural Development Policies Vis-à-Vis the Ecological Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1