经皮碘沙醇冠脉介入治疗的中国患者主要心脑血管不良事件发生率:一项观察性研究

Xiaozeng Wang, D. Ma, Tianchang Li, Bao Li, Xi Su, Yanqing Wu, Zhiming Du, Zheng Ji, Ping‐Ping Yang, Baisong Yang, Xue-bin Cao, Junxia Li, F. Hou, Zi-ping Cheng, Bang-long Xu, Yaling Han
{"title":"经皮碘沙醇冠脉介入治疗的中国患者主要心脑血管不良事件发生率:一项观察性研究","authors":"Xiaozeng Wang, D. Ma, Tianchang Li, Bao Li, Xi Su, Yanqing Wu, Zhiming Du, Zheng Ji, Ping‐Ping Yang, Baisong Yang, Xue-bin Cao, Junxia Li, F. Hou, Zi-ping Cheng, Bang-long Xu, Yaling Han","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and overall safety profile associated with iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients at 30 centers in China registered in the OpenClinic v3.6 database from October 30, 2013, to October 7, 2015, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCEs including target lesion revascularization (TLR), stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiac death, and PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) within 72 h post-PCI. Secondary endpoints were MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI and other safety events within 30 d post-PCI. Results: A total of 3,042 patients were enrolled. The incidence of MACCEs within 72 h post-PCI was 2.33% (n = 71), including cardiac death (0.03%, n = 1) and PCI-related MI (2.30%, n = 70). The incidence of MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI was 0.16% (n = 5), including cardiac death (0.10%, n = 3), PCI-related MI (0.03%, n = 1), and TLR for stent thrombosis (0.03%, n = 1). The incidence of composite angiographic or procedural complications was 2.86% (n = 87); 233 (7.86%) patients had results suggesting contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the use of iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing PCI is associated with a low incidence of MACCEs, confirming its safety in this population.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Iodixanol: An Observational Postauthorization Study\",\"authors\":\"Xiaozeng Wang, D. Ma, Tianchang Li, Bao Li, Xi Su, Yanqing Wu, Zhiming Du, Zheng Ji, Ping‐Ping Yang, Baisong Yang, Xue-bin Cao, Junxia Li, F. Hou, Zi-ping Cheng, Bang-long Xu, Yaling Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and overall safety profile associated with iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients at 30 centers in China registered in the OpenClinic v3.6 database from October 30, 2013, to October 7, 2015, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCEs including target lesion revascularization (TLR), stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiac death, and PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) within 72 h post-PCI. Secondary endpoints were MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI and other safety events within 30 d post-PCI. Results: A total of 3,042 patients were enrolled. The incidence of MACCEs within 72 h post-PCI was 2.33% (n = 71), including cardiac death (0.03%, n = 1) and PCI-related MI (2.30%, n = 70). The incidence of MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI was 0.16% (n = 5), including cardiac death (0.10%, n = 3), PCI-related MI (0.03%, n = 1), and TLR for stent thrombosis (0.03%, n = 1). The incidence of composite angiographic or procedural complications was 2.86% (n = 87); 233 (7.86%) patients had results suggesting contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the use of iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing PCI is associated with a low incidence of MACCEs, confirming its safety in this population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology discovery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者与碘沙醇相关的主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)和总体安全性。方法:纳入2013年10月30日至2015年10月7日在OpenClinic v3.6数据库中注册的中国30个中心的患者。主要终点是院内MACCEs,包括pci术后72小时内的靶病变血运重建术(TLR)、卒中、支架血栓形成、心源性死亡和pci相关心肌梗死(MI)。次要终点是pci术后72 h至30 d的MACCEs和pci术后30 d内的其他安全事件。结果:共纳入3042例患者。pci术后72 h内MACCEs发生率为2.33% (n = 71),包括心源性死亡(0.03%,n = 1)和pci相关MI (2.30%, n = 70)。pci术后72 h至30 d MACCEs发生率为0.16% (n = 5),包括心源性死亡(0.10%,n = 3)、pci相关心肌梗死(0.03%,n = 1)和支架血栓TLR (0.03%, n = 1)。复合血管造影或手术并发症发生率为2.86% (n = 87);233例(7.86%)患者提示造影剂所致急性肾损伤。结论:这些研究结果表明,在接受PCI的中国患者中使用碘沙醇与MACCEs的低发生率相关,证实了其在该人群中的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Iodixanol: An Observational Postauthorization Study
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and overall safety profile associated with iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Patients at 30 centers in China registered in the OpenClinic v3.6 database from October 30, 2013, to October 7, 2015, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACCEs including target lesion revascularization (TLR), stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiac death, and PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) within 72 h post-PCI. Secondary endpoints were MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI and other safety events within 30 d post-PCI. Results: A total of 3,042 patients were enrolled. The incidence of MACCEs within 72 h post-PCI was 2.33% (n = 71), including cardiac death (0.03%, n = 1) and PCI-related MI (2.30%, n = 70). The incidence of MACCEs from 72 h to 30 d post-PCI was 0.16% (n = 5), including cardiac death (0.10%, n = 3), PCI-related MI (0.03%, n = 1), and TLR for stent thrombosis (0.03%, n = 1). The incidence of composite angiographic or procedural complications was 2.86% (n = 87); 233 (7.86%) patients had results suggesting contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the use of iodixanol in Chinese patients undergoing PCI is associated with a low incidence of MACCEs, confirming its safety in this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Novel Long QT Syndrome Type 2-associated F129I Mutation in the KCNH2 Gene Significantly Affects I Kr Through the hERG1 Homomeric and Heteromeric Potassium Channels Fulminant Myocarditis Complicated by Stiff-person Syndrome: A Case Report Predictive Value of Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and All-cause Mortality in Different Age Groups of a Chinese Community Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Its Association With Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensive Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in China. Interpretation of the Annual Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1