居住条件不稳定的澳大利亚老年人的替代住房模式

Q2 Social Sciences AHURI Final Report Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.18408/ahuri3225201
S. Tually, V. Coram, D. Faulkner, H. Barrie, Andrea Sharam, Amity James, B. Lowies, Kirsten Bevin, E. Webb, H. Hodgson, A. Cebulla
{"title":"居住条件不稳定的澳大利亚老年人的替代住房模式","authors":"S. Tually, V. Coram, D. Faulkner, H. Barrie, Andrea Sharam, Amity James, B. Lowies, Kirsten Bevin, E. Webb, H. Hodgson, A. Cebulla","doi":"10.18408/ahuri3225201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"older Australians; movement towards higher density developments in amenity-rich locations; the scope for housing to deliver social, safety, security, health and wellbeing benefits; and, the need for a diverse range of housing options for older people. research project on alternative models The project brings together the findings of a review of alternative housing models and evidence collected from a range of key informants to identify models that could be expanded in Australia to create more and better housing options for lower income older people. The review drew on academic, policy and industry literature from Australia and overseas, with a focus on models that are relatively uncommon in Australia. The key informants included Australian stakeholders (housing and aged care providers, developers, architects, planners and advocates) and international housing experts from the US, Canada, UK, Singapore and New Zealand. Ninety-six Australian stakeholders completed an online survey and 16 were interviewed. Five international housing experts were interviewed and provided written responses to questions. The project of seven composite housing models representing different combinations of these attributes that trade-offs that be necessary to ensure affordability, and need diverse range of housing options). The appeal of these models among the target population will be tested in the third supporting research project, while their feasibility and scalability will be explored further in the Inquiry research activities.","PeriodicalId":38320,"journal":{"name":"AHURI Final Report","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative housing models for precariously housed older Australians\",\"authors\":\"S. Tually, V. Coram, D. Faulkner, H. Barrie, Andrea Sharam, Amity James, B. Lowies, Kirsten Bevin, E. Webb, H. Hodgson, A. Cebulla\",\"doi\":\"10.18408/ahuri3225201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"older Australians; movement towards higher density developments in amenity-rich locations; the scope for housing to deliver social, safety, security, health and wellbeing benefits; and, the need for a diverse range of housing options for older people. research project on alternative models The project brings together the findings of a review of alternative housing models and evidence collected from a range of key informants to identify models that could be expanded in Australia to create more and better housing options for lower income older people. The review drew on academic, policy and industry literature from Australia and overseas, with a focus on models that are relatively uncommon in Australia. The key informants included Australian stakeholders (housing and aged care providers, developers, architects, planners and advocates) and international housing experts from the US, Canada, UK, Singapore and New Zealand. Ninety-six Australian stakeholders completed an online survey and 16 were interviewed. Five international housing experts were interviewed and provided written responses to questions. The project of seven composite housing models representing different combinations of these attributes that trade-offs that be necessary to ensure affordability, and need diverse range of housing options). The appeal of these models among the target population will be tested in the third supporting research project, while their feasibility and scalability will be explored further in the Inquiry research activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AHURI Final Report\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AHURI Final Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri3225201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHURI Final Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18408/ahuri3225201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

澳大利亚老年人;在便利设施丰富的地区进行更高密度的开发;提供社会、安全、保障、健康和福利的住房范围;以及需要为老年人提供各种各样的住房选择。替代模式研究项目该项目汇集了对替代住房模式的审查结果和从一系列关键信息提供者那里收集的证据,以确定可以在澳大利亚扩大的模式,为低收入老年人创造更多更好的住房选择。该评论借鉴了澳大利亚和海外的学术、政策和行业文献,重点关注在澳大利亚相对罕见的模式。主要信息提供者包括澳大利亚利益相关者(住房和老年护理提供者、开发商、建筑师、规划师和倡导者)以及来自美国、加拿大、英国、新加坡和新西兰的国际住房专家。96名澳大利亚利益相关者完成了一项在线调查,16人接受了采访。采访了五位国际住房专家,并对问题作出了书面答复。七个复合住房模型的项目代表了这些属性的不同组合,这些属性是确保可负担性所必需的权衡,并且需要各种各样的住房选择)。这些模型在目标人群中的吸引力将在第三个支持研究项目中进行测试,而其可行性和可扩展性将在调查研究活动中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative housing models for precariously housed older Australians
older Australians; movement towards higher density developments in amenity-rich locations; the scope for housing to deliver social, safety, security, health and wellbeing benefits; and, the need for a diverse range of housing options for older people. research project on alternative models The project brings together the findings of a review of alternative housing models and evidence collected from a range of key informants to identify models that could be expanded in Australia to create more and better housing options for lower income older people. The review drew on academic, policy and industry literature from Australia and overseas, with a focus on models that are relatively uncommon in Australia. The key informants included Australian stakeholders (housing and aged care providers, developers, architects, planners and advocates) and international housing experts from the US, Canada, UK, Singapore and New Zealand. Ninety-six Australian stakeholders completed an online survey and 16 were interviewed. Five international housing experts were interviewed and provided written responses to questions. The project of seven composite housing models representing different combinations of these attributes that trade-offs that be necessary to ensure affordability, and need diverse range of housing options). The appeal of these models among the target population will be tested in the third supporting research project, while their feasibility and scalability will be explored further in the Inquiry research activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AHURI Final Report
AHURI Final Report Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Place-based drivers and effective management of population growth and change in regional Australia Indigenous people’s mobility and its impact on remote infrastructural needs: an exploratory study Disruption in regional housing: Policy responses for more resilient markets Getting off the waiting list? Managing housing assistance provision in an era of intensifying social housing shortage House price dynamics and internal migration across Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1