社会价值取向滑块量表重测信度评估

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009013
Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes, Dieko M. Bakker, J. Dijkstra
{"title":"社会价值取向滑块量表重测信度评估","authors":"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes, Dieko M. Bakker, J. Dijkstra","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Decades of research show that (i) social\n value orientation (SVO) is related to important behavioral outcomes such as\n cooperation and charitable giving, and (ii)\n individuals differ in terms of SVO. A prominent scale to measure SVO is the\n social value orientation slider measure (SVOSM). The central premise is that\n SVOSM captures a stable trait. But it is unknown how reliable the SVOSM is\n over repeated measurements more than one week apart. To fill this knowledge\n gap, we followed a sample of N = 495 over 6\n months with monthly SVO measurements. We find that continuous SVO scores are\n similarly distributed (Anderson-Darling k-sample\n p = 0.57) and highly correlated\n (r ≥ 0.66) across waves. The intra-class\n correlation coefficient of 0.78 attests to a high test-retest reliability.\n Using multilevel modeling and multiple visualizations, we furthermore find\n that one’s prior SVO score is highly indicative of SVO in future waves,\n suggesting that the slider measure consistently captures one’s SVO. Our\n analyses validate the slider measure as a reliable SVO scale.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the test-retest reliability of the social value orientation\\n slider measure\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes, Dieko M. Bakker, J. Dijkstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1930297500009013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Decades of research show that (i) social\\n value orientation (SVO) is related to important behavioral outcomes such as\\n cooperation and charitable giving, and (ii)\\n individuals differ in terms of SVO. A prominent scale to measure SVO is the\\n social value orientation slider measure (SVOSM). The central premise is that\\n SVOSM captures a stable trait. But it is unknown how reliable the SVOSM is\\n over repeated measurements more than one week apart. To fill this knowledge\\n gap, we followed a sample of N = 495 over 6\\n months with monthly SVO measurements. We find that continuous SVO scores are\\n similarly distributed (Anderson-Darling k-sample\\n p = 0.57) and highly correlated\\n (r ≥ 0.66) across waves. The intra-class\\n correlation coefficient of 0.78 attests to a high test-retest reliability.\\n Using multilevel modeling and multiple visualizations, we furthermore find\\n that one’s prior SVO score is highly indicative of SVO in future waves,\\n suggesting that the slider measure consistently captures one’s SVO. Our\\n analyses validate the slider measure as a reliable SVO scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judgment and Decision Making\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judgment and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数十年的研究表明,(i)社会价值取向(SVO)与合作和慈善捐赠等重要行为结果有关,(ii)个体在SVO方面存在差异。衡量SVO的一个突出尺度是社会价值取向滑块测度(SVOSM)。中心前提是SVOSM捕获了一个稳定的特性。但尚不清楚SVOSM在间隔一周以上的重复测量中的可靠性。为了填补这一知识空白,我们对N=495的样本进行了为期6个月的每月SVO测量。我们发现连续SVO评分在各波中分布相似(Anderson-DDarling k样本p=0.57),且高度相关(r≥0.66)。0.78的类内相关系数证明了重测的高可靠性。使用多层次建模和多重可视化,我们进一步发现,一个人之前的SVO分数高度指示了未来波浪中的SVO,这表明滑块测量始终捕捉到一个人的SVO。我们的分析验证了滑块测量是一种可靠的SVO量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the test-retest reliability of the social value orientation slider measure
Decades of research show that (i) social value orientation (SVO) is related to important behavioral outcomes such as cooperation and charitable giving, and (ii) individuals differ in terms of SVO. A prominent scale to measure SVO is the social value orientation slider measure (SVOSM). The central premise is that SVOSM captures a stable trait. But it is unknown how reliable the SVOSM is over repeated measurements more than one week apart. To fill this knowledge gap, we followed a sample of N = 495 over 6 months with monthly SVO measurements. We find that continuous SVO scores are similarly distributed (Anderson-Darling k-sample p = 0.57) and highly correlated (r ≥ 0.66) across waves. The intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.78 attests to a high test-retest reliability. Using multilevel modeling and multiple visualizations, we furthermore find that one’s prior SVO score is highly indicative of SVO in future waves, suggesting that the slider measure consistently captures one’s SVO. Our analyses validate the slider measure as a reliable SVO scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1