非国大党派治理的历史根源分析:理解国家占领之路

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politikon Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1080/02589346.2021.2018119
J. Fredericks, Nicola de Jager
{"title":"非国大党派治理的历史根源分析:理解国家占领之路","authors":"J. Fredericks, Nicola de Jager","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2021.2018119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite constitutional aspirations for good (impartial) governance since 1996, partisan governance nearly brought South Africa to the brink of economic, social, and political implosion. For the duration of his tenure (2009–2018), President Zuma spent public funds for private ends with impunity and enabled the creation of a shadow state, which effectively siphoned millions out of the public purse into private hands and hollowed out the country's state-owned enterprises. The question posed here is: How did the Zuma administration manage to ‘capture the state' in a context where the 1996 Constitution enshrines impartial governance? Using the analytical framework of good governance, this article aims to understand the governance approach of the African National Congress (ANC) in terms of its overarching national plan, the National Democratic Revolution (NDR) and its strategy of cadre deployment. Using document and conceptual content analysis of ANC policy documents it is noted that the ANC’s governance approach is inherently partisan, with historical roots. In line with the Marxist tradition, governance based on partisanship was established together with the blurring of lines between party, government and state. This framework of partisanship, justified with the language of transformation, allowed for repurposing the state for private ends.","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"49 1","pages":"21 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of the Historical Roots of Partisan Governance within the ANC: Understanding the Road to State Capture\",\"authors\":\"J. Fredericks, Nicola de Jager\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2021.2018119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite constitutional aspirations for good (impartial) governance since 1996, partisan governance nearly brought South Africa to the brink of economic, social, and political implosion. For the duration of his tenure (2009–2018), President Zuma spent public funds for private ends with impunity and enabled the creation of a shadow state, which effectively siphoned millions out of the public purse into private hands and hollowed out the country's state-owned enterprises. The question posed here is: How did the Zuma administration manage to ‘capture the state' in a context where the 1996 Constitution enshrines impartial governance? Using the analytical framework of good governance, this article aims to understand the governance approach of the African National Congress (ANC) in terms of its overarching national plan, the National Democratic Revolution (NDR) and its strategy of cadre deployment. Using document and conceptual content analysis of ANC policy documents it is noted that the ANC’s governance approach is inherently partisan, with historical roots. In line with the Marxist tradition, governance based on partisanship was established together with the blurring of lines between party, government and state. This framework of partisanship, justified with the language of transformation, allowed for repurposing the state for private ends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.2018119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.2018119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要尽管自1996年以来,宪法一直渴望良好(公正)的治理,但党派治理几乎将南非带到了经济、社会和政治崩溃的边缘。在任期内(2009-2018年),祖马总统将公共资金用于私人目的而不受惩罚,并促成了影子国家的创建,这有效地将数百万公共资金抽到了私人手中,并掏空了该国的国有企业。这里提出的问题是:在1996年宪法规定公正治理的背景下,祖马政府是如何“夺取国家”的?利用善治的分析框架,本文旨在了解非洲人国民大会(ANC)的治理方法,包括其总体国家计划、全国民主革命(NDR)及其干部部署战略。通过对非国大政策文件的文件和概念内容分析,可以发现非国大的治理方法本质上是党派性的,具有历史根源。按照马克思主义的传统,建立在党派基础上的治理,与模糊的党、政府和国家之间的界限相结合。这种党派之争的框架,用变革的语言来证明,允许将国家重新用于私人目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of the Historical Roots of Partisan Governance within the ANC: Understanding the Road to State Capture
ABSTRACT Despite constitutional aspirations for good (impartial) governance since 1996, partisan governance nearly brought South Africa to the brink of economic, social, and political implosion. For the duration of his tenure (2009–2018), President Zuma spent public funds for private ends with impunity and enabled the creation of a shadow state, which effectively siphoned millions out of the public purse into private hands and hollowed out the country's state-owned enterprises. The question posed here is: How did the Zuma administration manage to ‘capture the state' in a context where the 1996 Constitution enshrines impartial governance? Using the analytical framework of good governance, this article aims to understand the governance approach of the African National Congress (ANC) in terms of its overarching national plan, the National Democratic Revolution (NDR) and its strategy of cadre deployment. Using document and conceptual content analysis of ANC policy documents it is noted that the ANC’s governance approach is inherently partisan, with historical roots. In line with the Marxist tradition, governance based on partisanship was established together with the blurring of lines between party, government and state. This framework of partisanship, justified with the language of transformation, allowed for repurposing the state for private ends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
期刊最新文献
Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries , by, Simon David Taylor, London, Routledge, May 2022, 248pp., £130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781351065467 Amin’s progressive internationalism EU sanctions on Zimbabwe: rethinking Africa’s economic and political security in the global age Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa Between Samir Amin and Claude Ake: towards a roadmap for Africa’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1