《一切取决于中国:21世纪的环境治理》

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Global Environmental Politics Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1162/glep_a_00627
M. Henderson
{"title":"《一切取决于中国:21世纪的环境治理》","authors":"M. Henderson","doi":"10.1162/glep_a_00627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From recurring “airpocalypses” that send air pollution indexes off the charts and an insatiable demand for timber and mineral resources to President Xi Jinping’s promises to lead in global climate negotiations and share the model of “ecological civilization” through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the world’s most populous country has become the most critical to understanding global environmental politics. With Western democracies challenged to sustain even modest cuts to carbon emissions and most global consumers largely oblivious to the environmental impacts of their buying habits, it can be tempting for some to entrust environmental governance to a stronger, more authoritarian system. Whether such a system can work, and what its collateral costs would be, may determine the fate of the global environment in this century. Three additions to the growing bookshelf on Beijing’s ecological policies agree: “What happens to China environmentally in the 21st century matters deeply—for everyone” (Gardner, 221); “The fate of their nation and the fate of the planet depend greatly on” the Chinese people (Smith, 196); in short, “Everything seems to hinge on China” (Li and Shapiro, 147). When, starting in 1978, the Chinese Communist leadership turned away from Chairman Mao Zedong’s collectivist vision of economic development, they opened the door for the “sprouts of capitalism” to turn China into the “factory to the world” and, four decades later, the world’s third-largest and fastest-growing major consumer market (World Bank 2019). In the 1980s, China’s economic reforms seemed to hold the potential to reverse much of","PeriodicalId":47774,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Politics","volume":"21 1","pages":"148-153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It All Hinges on China: Environmental Governance in the Twenty-First Century\",\"authors\":\"M. Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/glep_a_00627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From recurring “airpocalypses” that send air pollution indexes off the charts and an insatiable demand for timber and mineral resources to President Xi Jinping’s promises to lead in global climate negotiations and share the model of “ecological civilization” through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the world’s most populous country has become the most critical to understanding global environmental politics. With Western democracies challenged to sustain even modest cuts to carbon emissions and most global consumers largely oblivious to the environmental impacts of their buying habits, it can be tempting for some to entrust environmental governance to a stronger, more authoritarian system. Whether such a system can work, and what its collateral costs would be, may determine the fate of the global environment in this century. Three additions to the growing bookshelf on Beijing’s ecological policies agree: “What happens to China environmentally in the 21st century matters deeply—for everyone” (Gardner, 221); “The fate of their nation and the fate of the planet depend greatly on” the Chinese people (Smith, 196); in short, “Everything seems to hinge on China” (Li and Shapiro, 147). When, starting in 1978, the Chinese Communist leadership turned away from Chairman Mao Zedong’s collectivist vision of economic development, they opened the door for the “sprouts of capitalism” to turn China into the “factory to the world” and, four decades later, the world’s third-largest and fastest-growing major consumer market (World Bank 2019). In the 1980s, China’s economic reforms seemed to hold the potential to reverse much of\",\"PeriodicalId\":47774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Politics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"148-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00627\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00627","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于西方民主国家面临着维持哪怕是适度的碳排放削减的挑战,而大多数全球消费者在很大程度上忽视了他们的购买习惯对环境的影响,一些人可能很容易将环境治理委托给一个更强大、更专制的体系。这样一个体系能否奏效,以及它的附带成本是什么,可能会决定本世纪全球环境的命运。关于北京的生态政策,书架上又增加了三个观点:“21世纪中国环境的变化对每个人都至关重要”(Gardner, 221);“他们国家的命运和地球的命运在很大程度上取决于”中国人(Smith, 196);简而言之,“一切似乎都取决于中国”(Li and Shapiro, 147)。上世纪80年代,中国的经济改革似乎有可能扭转大部分局面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
It All Hinges on China: Environmental Governance in the Twenty-First Century
From recurring “airpocalypses” that send air pollution indexes off the charts and an insatiable demand for timber and mineral resources to President Xi Jinping’s promises to lead in global climate negotiations and share the model of “ecological civilization” through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the world’s most populous country has become the most critical to understanding global environmental politics. With Western democracies challenged to sustain even modest cuts to carbon emissions and most global consumers largely oblivious to the environmental impacts of their buying habits, it can be tempting for some to entrust environmental governance to a stronger, more authoritarian system. Whether such a system can work, and what its collateral costs would be, may determine the fate of the global environment in this century. Three additions to the growing bookshelf on Beijing’s ecological policies agree: “What happens to China environmentally in the 21st century matters deeply—for everyone” (Gardner, 221); “The fate of their nation and the fate of the planet depend greatly on” the Chinese people (Smith, 196); in short, “Everything seems to hinge on China” (Li and Shapiro, 147). When, starting in 1978, the Chinese Communist leadership turned away from Chairman Mao Zedong’s collectivist vision of economic development, they opened the door for the “sprouts of capitalism” to turn China into the “factory to the world” and, four decades later, the world’s third-largest and fastest-growing major consumer market (World Bank 2019). In the 1980s, China’s economic reforms seemed to hold the potential to reverse much of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Politics examines the relationship between global political forces and environmental change, with particular attention given to the implications of local-global interactions for environmental management as well as the implications of environmental change for world politics. Each issue is divided into research articles and a shorter forum articles focusing on issues such as the role of states, multilateral institutions and agreements, trade, international finance, corporations, science and technology, and grassroots movements.
期刊最新文献
The Ecocentrists: A History of Radical Environmentalism by Keith Makoto Woodhouse The Role of Translation in Enacting Multiscalar Climate Action: Insights from European Christian Faith-Based Actors All Hands on Deck: Solutions-Based Pedagogies for Global Environmental Politics African Ecomedia: Network Forms, Planetary Politics by Cajetan Iheka Realpolitik in the Anthropocene: Resilience, Neoclassical Realism, and the Paris Agreement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1