引领潮流还是改变游戏?瑞典竞选活动的专业化和数字化

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Political Marketing Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555
M. Grusell, L. Nord
{"title":"引领潮流还是改变游戏?瑞典竞选活动的专业化和数字化","authors":"M. Grusell, L. Nord","doi":"10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professionalization and digitalization are two distinctive features of election campaigns in the twenty-first century. Are existing campaign structures and strategies reinforced by the implementation of new technology, or does this technology radically change campaigning conditions? This article investigates this topic by analyzing the two most recent national election campaigns in Sweden in 2010 and 2014. The results indicate that both professionalization and digitalization tendencies are strong, but most clearly linked to each other among bigger, catch-all campaign parties, while smaller niche parties in a multiparty system tend to choose different campaign options with regard to structure and strategies.","PeriodicalId":46259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Marketing","volume":"19 1","pages":"258 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting the Trend or Changing the Game? Professionalization and Digitalization of Election Campaigns in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"M. Grusell, L. Nord\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professionalization and digitalization are two distinctive features of election campaigns in the twenty-first century. Are existing campaign structures and strategies reinforced by the implementation of new technology, or does this technology radically change campaigning conditions? This article investigates this topic by analyzing the two most recent national election campaigns in Sweden in 2010 and 2014. The results indicate that both professionalization and digitalization tendencies are strong, but most clearly linked to each other among bigger, catch-all campaign parties, while smaller niche parties in a multiparty system tend to choose different campaign options with regard to structure and strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"258 - 278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

专业化和数字化是21世纪竞选活动的两个显著特点。新技术的实施是否加强了现有的竞选结构和战略,或者这项技术是否从根本上改变了竞选条件?本文通过分析2010年和2014年瑞典最近的两次全国大选来探讨这一话题。结果表明,专业化和数字化趋势都很强烈,但在更大的、包罗万象的竞选政党中,两者之间的联系最为明显,而在多党制中,较小的小众政党往往在结构和战略方面选择不同的竞选选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Setting the Trend or Changing the Game? Professionalization and Digitalization of Election Campaigns in Sweden
Professionalization and digitalization are two distinctive features of election campaigns in the twenty-first century. Are existing campaign structures and strategies reinforced by the implementation of new technology, or does this technology radically change campaigning conditions? This article investigates this topic by analyzing the two most recent national election campaigns in Sweden in 2010 and 2014. The results indicate that both professionalization and digitalization tendencies are strong, but most clearly linked to each other among bigger, catch-all campaign parties, while smaller niche parties in a multiparty system tend to choose different campaign options with regard to structure and strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Marketing
Journal of Political Marketing POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Marketing aims to be the leading scholarly journal examining the latest developments in the application of marketing methods to politics. As the political world becomes more complex and interwoven, it is imperative for all interested parties to stay abreast of “cutting edge” tools that are used in unique and different ways in countries around the world. The journal goes beyond the application of advertising to politics to study various strategic marketing tools such as: Voter segmentation Candidate positioning Use of multivariate statistical modeling to better understand the thinking and choices made by voters.
期刊最新文献
Democratic Malaise: A Proposed Theoretical Conceptualization for Marketing Malaise The Influences of Political Strategies and Communication Styles on Political Candidates’ Online and Offline Visibility Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election Political Campaign Professionalization in Lithuanian Elections Professionalization of Campaign Communication beyond Communication Forms. An Analysis of Poland’s Political Spots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1