失地天堂:行政法治外法权的再思考

J. Handrlica
{"title":"失地天堂:行政法治外法权的再思考","authors":"J. Handrlica","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, the scholarship of administrative law has paid only very limited\nattention to the phaenomenon of extraterritoriality. Hereby, the scholarship has reflected the\ntheoretical considerations concerning the sovereignty of the State, which have implied that\nadministrative authorities execute their functions exclusively in the territory of the State. At\nthe same time, the scholarship of international public law has traditionally acknowledged\nthat – as based on a corresponding international agreement – a State may allow the\nadministrative authorities of a foreign State to execute certain functions in its own territory.\nThis article aims to reconcile these two approaches, demonstrating that the phaenomenon of\nextraterritoriality has emerged to represent an integral part of the system of administrative\nlaw in various jurisdictions. This article also argues that this perception of administrative\nlaw actually fails to represent any new feature, but is based on traditional concepts existing\nin the public law of Europe. Thus, extraterritoriality must be considered as a part of the ius\npublicum europaeum commune.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradise of territoriality lost:\\nrethinking extraterritoriality in administrative law\",\"authors\":\"J. Handrlica\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, the scholarship of administrative law has paid only very limited\\nattention to the phaenomenon of extraterritoriality. Hereby, the scholarship has reflected the\\ntheoretical considerations concerning the sovereignty of the State, which have implied that\\nadministrative authorities execute their functions exclusively in the territory of the State. At\\nthe same time, the scholarship of international public law has traditionally acknowledged\\nthat – as based on a corresponding international agreement – a State may allow the\\nadministrative authorities of a foreign State to execute certain functions in its own territory.\\nThis article aims to reconcile these two approaches, demonstrating that the phaenomenon of\\nextraterritoriality has emerged to represent an integral part of the system of administrative\\nlaw in various jurisdictions. This article also argues that this perception of administrative\\nlaw actually fails to represent any new feature, but is based on traditional concepts existing\\nin the public law of Europe. Thus, extraterritoriality must be considered as a part of the ius\\npublicum europaeum commune.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2021/11/3.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,行政法学术界对治外法权现象的关注非常有限。因此,学术界反映了有关国家主权的理论考虑,这意味着行政当局只能在国家领土内履行其职能。与此同时,国际公法学术界传统上承认- -根据相应的国际协定- -一国可以允许外国的行政当局在其本国领土内执行某些职能。本文旨在调和这两种方法,表明治外法权的现象已经出现,代表了不同司法管辖区行政法系统的一个组成部分。本文还认为,这种行政法观念实际上并没有代表任何新的特征,而是基于欧洲公法中存在的传统概念。因此,治外法权必须被视为欧洲共同体的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradise of territoriality lost: rethinking extraterritoriality in administrative law
Traditionally, the scholarship of administrative law has paid only very limited attention to the phaenomenon of extraterritoriality. Hereby, the scholarship has reflected the theoretical considerations concerning the sovereignty of the State, which have implied that administrative authorities execute their functions exclusively in the territory of the State. At the same time, the scholarship of international public law has traditionally acknowledged that – as based on a corresponding international agreement – a State may allow the administrative authorities of a foreign State to execute certain functions in its own territory. This article aims to reconcile these two approaches, demonstrating that the phaenomenon of extraterritoriality has emerged to represent an integral part of the system of administrative law in various jurisdictions. This article also argues that this perception of administrative law actually fails to represent any new feature, but is based on traditional concepts existing in the public law of Europe. Thus, extraterritoriality must be considered as a part of the ius publicum europaeum commune.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure Preventing computer crime by knowing the legal regulations that ensure the protection of computer systems A regulatory analysis of digital financial services and the adoption of central bank digital currencies in Zimbabwe and South Africa Forum shopping in regulatory sandboxes and the perils of experimental law-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1