幼儿自闭症定量检查表的信度和测量随时间的不变性

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis Pub Date : 2021-05-20 DOI:10.1285/I20705948V14N1P146
Annalisa Levante, S. Petrocchi, F. Lecciso
{"title":"幼儿自闭症定量检查表的信度和测量随时间的不变性","authors":"Annalisa Levante, S. Petrocchi, F. Lecciso","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V14N1P146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study evaluated the stability over time of the Q-CHAT (i.e., Quantitative-CHecklist for Autism in Toddler), a screening tool for the early detection of Autism. The Q-CHAT is filled by parents when the child is from 18-36 months old, and whether a risk score is found, the clinician refers the child to a more in-depth diagnostic evaluation. Previous studies demonstrated the measure test-retest reliability on a small time interval (1-6 months). Therefore, the present study tested the stability of the scores considering a larger time interval of 18 months. No previous studies have tested its measurement invariance over time. Since the tool is filled by parents during a large time span (18-36 months of life), it is imperative to understand whether there is an invariance over time in their evaluations. The Italian version of the Q-CHAT was completed by 282 parents of children with no pre-existing signs of risk of Autism. The Q-CHAT was administered when children were 18 months (T1) and then 18 months later (T2). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the test-retest reliability ranged from sufficient to moderate. The measurement invariance across time revealed a tolerable configural and metric invariance. Contrary, the scalar invariance was not met meaning that the means of the constructs are not invariant over time. The findings give a further demonstration of the reliability of the Q-CHAT. They give evidence that changes in the scores would reflect real changes in the construct itself, and not in the way individuals interpret the measure items.","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"14 1","pages":"146-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest Reliability and Measurement Invariance across time of the Quantitative-CHecklist for Autism in Toddler\",\"authors\":\"Annalisa Levante, S. Petrocchi, F. Lecciso\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/I20705948V14N1P146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study evaluated the stability over time of the Q-CHAT (i.e., Quantitative-CHecklist for Autism in Toddler), a screening tool for the early detection of Autism. The Q-CHAT is filled by parents when the child is from 18-36 months old, and whether a risk score is found, the clinician refers the child to a more in-depth diagnostic evaluation. Previous studies demonstrated the measure test-retest reliability on a small time interval (1-6 months). Therefore, the present study tested the stability of the scores considering a larger time interval of 18 months. No previous studies have tested its measurement invariance over time. Since the tool is filled by parents during a large time span (18-36 months of life), it is imperative to understand whether there is an invariance over time in their evaluations. The Italian version of the Q-CHAT was completed by 282 parents of children with no pre-existing signs of risk of Autism. The Q-CHAT was administered when children were 18 months (T1) and then 18 months later (T2). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the test-retest reliability ranged from sufficient to moderate. The measurement invariance across time revealed a tolerable configural and metric invariance. Contrary, the scalar invariance was not met meaning that the means of the constructs are not invariant over time. The findings give a further demonstration of the reliability of the Q-CHAT. They give evidence that changes in the scores would reflect real changes in the construct itself, and not in the way individuals interpret the measure items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"146-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V14N1P146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V14N1P146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了Q-CHAT(即幼儿自闭症定量检查表)的稳定性,这是一种早期发现自闭症的筛查工具。当孩子18-36个月大时,家长填写Q-CHAT,如果发现风险评分,临床医生会让孩子进行更深入的诊断评估。以往的研究表明,在较小的时间间隔(1-6个月)内测量的重测信度。因此,本研究考虑更大的时间间隔18个月来检验得分的稳定性。以前没有研究测试过它随时间的测量不变性。由于该工具是由父母在很长一段时间内(18-36个月)填写的,因此有必要了解他们的评估是否存在随时间的不变性。意大利版的Q-CHAT是由282名父母完成的,他们的孩子之前没有自闭症的迹象。在儿童18个月(T1)和18个月(T2)时进行Q-CHAT。重测信度的类内相关系数范围从充分到中等。跨越时间的测量不变性揭示了一个可容忍的结构和度量不变性。相反,不满足标量不变性意味着构念的均值不随时间而不变。研究结果进一步证明了Q-CHAT的可靠性。他们提供的证据表明,分数的变化反映了结构本身的真实变化,而不是个人解释测量项目的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Test-retest Reliability and Measurement Invariance across time of the Quantitative-CHecklist for Autism in Toddler
The study evaluated the stability over time of the Q-CHAT (i.e., Quantitative-CHecklist for Autism in Toddler), a screening tool for the early detection of Autism. The Q-CHAT is filled by parents when the child is from 18-36 months old, and whether a risk score is found, the clinician refers the child to a more in-depth diagnostic evaluation. Previous studies demonstrated the measure test-retest reliability on a small time interval (1-6 months). Therefore, the present study tested the stability of the scores considering a larger time interval of 18 months. No previous studies have tested its measurement invariance over time. Since the tool is filled by parents during a large time span (18-36 months of life), it is imperative to understand whether there is an invariance over time in their evaluations. The Italian version of the Q-CHAT was completed by 282 parents of children with no pre-existing signs of risk of Autism. The Q-CHAT was administered when children were 18 months (T1) and then 18 months later (T2). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the test-retest reliability ranged from sufficient to moderate. The measurement invariance across time revealed a tolerable configural and metric invariance. Contrary, the scalar invariance was not met meaning that the means of the constructs are not invariant over time. The findings give a further demonstration of the reliability of the Q-CHAT. They give evidence that changes in the scores would reflect real changes in the construct itself, and not in the way individuals interpret the measure items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Data Analysis of Accuracy of US Weather Forecastes Extended asymmetry model based on logit transformation and decomposition of symmetry for square contingency tables with ordered categories Generalized Quasi Lindley Distribution: Theoretical Properties, Estimation Methods, and Applications Almost unbiased ridge estimator in the count data regression models Does the elimination of work flexibility contribute to reducing wage inequality? Empirical evidence from Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1