超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂下腹神经阻滞与腰方肌后阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术中的比较

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2248740
Mona Gad Mostafa Elebieby, A. Elshazli, Ahmed Medhat Ahmed Mohasseb, Mohammed Nashaat Mohammed
{"title":"超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂下腹神经阻滞与腰方肌后阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术中的比较","authors":"Mona Gad Mostafa Elebieby, A. Elshazli, Ahmed Medhat Ahmed Mohasseb, Mohammed Nashaat Mohammed","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2248740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background “Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block” (IINB) has been described as effective regional anesthetic method for providing analgesia after inguinal hernia operations. Other studies have also reported that the “posterior quadratus lumborum block” (PQLB) is an effective analgesic option for lower abdominal surgeries. Herein, we compared the previous two block techniques for postoperative pain management in adults undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Methods According to the block technique, 76 adult patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty under general anesthesia were randomly enrolled into two groups; the PQLB and IINB groups. The block was performed after skin closure and before patient extubation. Postoperative analgesic profiles were recorded in both groups. Results The PQLB had lower heart rate and mean arterial pressure readings during postoperative assessment compared to the other group. Pain scores showed a significant decline in association with the PQLB during the first postoperative day, which resulted in a significant decline in pethidine consumption (49.17 vs. 70 mg in the IINB group) and better patient satisfaction. The duration to the first analgesic request significantly increased in association with the PQLB (13.25 vs. 8.42 hours in the IINB group). The incidence of nausea and vomiting increased significantly in the IINB group secondary to increased pethidine requirements. Conclusion PQLB is superior to IINB in providing analgesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block compared to posterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair\",\"authors\":\"Mona Gad Mostafa Elebieby, A. Elshazli, Ahmed Medhat Ahmed Mohasseb, Mohammed Nashaat Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11101849.2023.2248740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background “Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block” (IINB) has been described as effective regional anesthetic method for providing analgesia after inguinal hernia operations. Other studies have also reported that the “posterior quadratus lumborum block” (PQLB) is an effective analgesic option for lower abdominal surgeries. Herein, we compared the previous two block techniques for postoperative pain management in adults undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Methods According to the block technique, 76 adult patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty under general anesthesia were randomly enrolled into two groups; the PQLB and IINB groups. The block was performed after skin closure and before patient extubation. Postoperative analgesic profiles were recorded in both groups. Results The PQLB had lower heart rate and mean arterial pressure readings during postoperative assessment compared to the other group. Pain scores showed a significant decline in association with the PQLB during the first postoperative day, which resulted in a significant decline in pethidine consumption (49.17 vs. 70 mg in the IINB group) and better patient satisfaction. The duration to the first analgesic request significantly increased in association with the PQLB (13.25 vs. 8.42 hours in the IINB group). The incidence of nausea and vomiting increased significantly in the IINB group secondary to increased pethidine requirements. Conclusion PQLB is superior to IINB in providing analgesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2248740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2248740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block compared to posterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair
ABSTRACT Background “Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block” (IINB) has been described as effective regional anesthetic method for providing analgesia after inguinal hernia operations. Other studies have also reported that the “posterior quadratus lumborum block” (PQLB) is an effective analgesic option for lower abdominal surgeries. Herein, we compared the previous two block techniques for postoperative pain management in adults undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Methods According to the block technique, 76 adult patients scheduled for inguinal hernioplasty under general anesthesia were randomly enrolled into two groups; the PQLB and IINB groups. The block was performed after skin closure and before patient extubation. Postoperative analgesic profiles were recorded in both groups. Results The PQLB had lower heart rate and mean arterial pressure readings during postoperative assessment compared to the other group. Pain scores showed a significant decline in association with the PQLB during the first postoperative day, which resulted in a significant decline in pethidine consumption (49.17 vs. 70 mg in the IINB group) and better patient satisfaction. The duration to the first analgesic request significantly increased in association with the PQLB (13.25 vs. 8.42 hours in the IINB group). The incidence of nausea and vomiting increased significantly in the IINB group secondary to increased pethidine requirements. Conclusion PQLB is superior to IINB in providing analgesia for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1