painDETECT问卷作为三叉神经痛筛查和治疗评估工具的评估

J. Klein, G. Schackert
{"title":"painDETECT问卷作为三叉神经痛筛查和治疗评估工具的评估","authors":"J. Klein, G. Schackert","doi":"10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Although trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is diagnosed clinically and most cases can be easily identified, misdiagnoses are frequent and lead to delayed treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the painDETECT questionnaire, an established tool for detecting neuropathic pain components, as a screening tool in TN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who had presented to our neuro-surgical outpatient department complaining of craniofacial pain between January 2019 and August 2021. The patients were categorized as likely having TN (TN group) or likely having pain of a different etiology (non-TN). Patients with other neuropathic facial pain syndromes or those in whom TN could not be diagnosed nor ruled out with sufficient confidence were excluded. The painDETECT scores were compared, along with other outcome parameters. Results: We identified 52 patients with craniofacial pain. After exclusion of 14 patients, 25 patients were included in the TN group and 13 in the non-TN group. The mean painDETECT score was 17.0±4.7 and 12.7±6.1, respectively (p=0.02). The positive predictive value for TN at a cutoff value of 19 points was 80%, the negative predictive value was 39%. In patients who underwent surgery, the correlation between the postoperative painDETECT score and the postoperative numeric rating scale score was 0.73 (p=0.01). Discussion: The painDETECT questionnaire is of limited use as a screening tool for possible TN. It can be utilized to track treatment outcomes if data collection beyond daily clinical use is desired.","PeriodicalId":74496,"journal":{"name":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the painDETECT questionnaire as a tool for screening and treatment evaluation in trigeminal neuralgia\",\"authors\":\"J. Klein, G. Schackert\",\"doi\":\"10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Although trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is diagnosed clinically and most cases can be easily identified, misdiagnoses are frequent and lead to delayed treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the painDETECT questionnaire, an established tool for detecting neuropathic pain components, as a screening tool in TN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who had presented to our neuro-surgical outpatient department complaining of craniofacial pain between January 2019 and August 2021. The patients were categorized as likely having TN (TN group) or likely having pain of a different etiology (non-TN). Patients with other neuropathic facial pain syndromes or those in whom TN could not be diagnosed nor ruled out with sufficient confidence were excluded. The painDETECT scores were compared, along with other outcome parameters. Results: We identified 52 patients with craniofacial pain. After exclusion of 14 patients, 25 patients were included in the TN group and 13 in the non-TN group. The mean painDETECT score was 17.0±4.7 and 12.7±6.1, respectively (p=0.02). The positive predictive value for TN at a cutoff value of 19 points was 80%, the negative predictive value was 39%. In patients who underwent surgery, the correlation between the postoperative painDETECT score and the postoperative numeric rating scale score was 0.73 (p=0.01). Discussion: The painDETECT questionnaire is of limited use as a screening tool for possible TN. It can be utilized to track treatment outcomes if data collection beyond daily clinical use is desired.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21801/ppcrj.2022.84.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:尽管三叉神经痛(TN)是临床诊断的,大多数病例都很容易识别,但误诊频繁,导致治疗延误。因此,我们评估了painDETECT问卷,这是一种检测神经性疼痛成分的既定工具,作为TN.方法:我们对2019年1月至2021年8月期间向我们的神经外科门诊就诊的所有抱怨颅面疼痛的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。将患者分为可能患有TN(TN组)或可能患有不同病因的疼痛(非TN)。排除患有其他神经性面部疼痛综合征的患者,或那些不能诊断或有足够信心排除TN的患者。将painDETECT评分与其他结果参数进行比较。结果:我们确定了52例颅面疼痛患者。排除14名患者后,25名患者纳入TN组,13名患者纳入非TN组。平均painDETECT评分分别为17.0±4.7和12.7±6.1(p=0.02)。在19分的临界值下,TN的阳性预测值为80%,阴性预测值为39%。在接受手术的患者中,术后painDETECT评分与术后数字评定量表评分之间的相关性为0.73(p=0.01)。讨论:painDETECT问卷作为可能的TNT的筛查工具用途有限。如果需要在日常临床使用之外收集数据,则可用于跟踪治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the painDETECT questionnaire as a tool for screening and treatment evaluation in trigeminal neuralgia
Introduction: Although trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is diagnosed clinically and most cases can be easily identified, misdiagnoses are frequent and lead to delayed treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the painDETECT questionnaire, an established tool for detecting neuropathic pain components, as a screening tool in TN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who had presented to our neuro-surgical outpatient department complaining of craniofacial pain between January 2019 and August 2021. The patients were categorized as likely having TN (TN group) or likely having pain of a different etiology (non-TN). Patients with other neuropathic facial pain syndromes or those in whom TN could not be diagnosed nor ruled out with sufficient confidence were excluded. The painDETECT scores were compared, along with other outcome parameters. Results: We identified 52 patients with craniofacial pain. After exclusion of 14 patients, 25 patients were included in the TN group and 13 in the non-TN group. The mean painDETECT score was 17.0±4.7 and 12.7±6.1, respectively (p=0.02). The positive predictive value for TN at a cutoff value of 19 points was 80%, the negative predictive value was 39%. In patients who underwent surgery, the correlation between the postoperative painDETECT score and the postoperative numeric rating scale score was 0.73 (p=0.01). Discussion: The painDETECT questionnaire is of limited use as a screening tool for possible TN. It can be utilized to track treatment outcomes if data collection beyond daily clinical use is desired.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for phantom limb pain: from pilot mechanistic studies to large clinical studies. Enhancing Dissemination and Understanding in Clinical Research Protocols: Optimizing Visual Communication in a Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trial. Physical Conditioning, Obesity and Fibromyalgia: Causal Relationship or Confounding? Editorial - Seeking Brain Homeostatic Compensatory Mechanisms for Pain Control. XIV International Symposium of Neuromodulation: Conference Abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1