受空化强度和覆盖植物管理制度影响的古草甸宏观聚集

Érika Andressa Silva, Micael Stolben Mallmann, Monike Andrade Pereira, Sarah Severo Pons, Felipe Dalla-zen Bertol, D. Reinert, J. M. Reichert
{"title":"受空化强度和覆盖植物管理制度影响的古草甸宏观聚集","authors":"Érika Andressa Silva, Micael Stolben Mallmann, Monike Andrade Pereira, Sarah Severo Pons, Felipe Dalla-zen Bertol, D. Reinert, J. M. Reichert","doi":"10.18011/bioeng2021v15n2p283-302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrasonic-based techniques allow the prediction of the energy required to break the aggregate and have been more commonly used to measure the stability of aggregates. Although they result in the same applied energy, certain combinations of time and power might correspond to different intensities of cavitation. Consequently, different responses in aggregation indexes can be obtained with different configurations of ultrasound techniques. Thus, this work was carried out to evaluate the effects of cavitation intensity in the distribution of aggregates of a Paleudalf under management systems with cover plants and to compare aggregate stability determination methods (ultrasound versus wet sieving). Aggregate samples of the BS (bare soil), OT (black oat + forage turnips) and OV (black oat + hairy vetch) treatments were exposed to ultrasonic irradiation in different combinations of potency and time: (U1) 74.5 W/4 s; (U2) 49.7 W/6 s; (U3) 74.5 W/10 s and (U4) 49.7 W/15 s. After each sonification, the samples were passed in the same set of sieves used in the standard method of wet sieving -WS (8.00 - 4.76, 4.76 - 2.00, 2.00 - 1.00, 1.00 - 0.25 and < 0.25 mm) and the geometric mean diameter (GMD) and mass-weighted mean diameter (WMD) were calculated. The amplitude of vibration exerted a greater influence on soil breakdown than the total energy applied. Compared to the ultrasound method, in the WS method observed higher percentage of retained aggregates in the size class 8-4.76 mm and, consequently, greater aggregation indexes GMD and WMD.","PeriodicalId":32292,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MACROAGGREGATION OF A PALEUDALF AFFECTED BY CAVITATION INTENSITY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WITH COVER PLANTS\",\"authors\":\"Érika Andressa Silva, Micael Stolben Mallmann, Monike Andrade Pereira, Sarah Severo Pons, Felipe Dalla-zen Bertol, D. Reinert, J. M. Reichert\",\"doi\":\"10.18011/bioeng2021v15n2p283-302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ultrasonic-based techniques allow the prediction of the energy required to break the aggregate and have been more commonly used to measure the stability of aggregates. Although they result in the same applied energy, certain combinations of time and power might correspond to different intensities of cavitation. Consequently, different responses in aggregation indexes can be obtained with different configurations of ultrasound techniques. Thus, this work was carried out to evaluate the effects of cavitation intensity in the distribution of aggregates of a Paleudalf under management systems with cover plants and to compare aggregate stability determination methods (ultrasound versus wet sieving). Aggregate samples of the BS (bare soil), OT (black oat + forage turnips) and OV (black oat + hairy vetch) treatments were exposed to ultrasonic irradiation in different combinations of potency and time: (U1) 74.5 W/4 s; (U2) 49.7 W/6 s; (U3) 74.5 W/10 s and (U4) 49.7 W/15 s. After each sonification, the samples were passed in the same set of sieves used in the standard method of wet sieving -WS (8.00 - 4.76, 4.76 - 2.00, 2.00 - 1.00, 1.00 - 0.25 and < 0.25 mm) and the geometric mean diameter (GMD) and mass-weighted mean diameter (WMD) were calculated. The amplitude of vibration exerted a greater influence on soil breakdown than the total energy applied. Compared to the ultrasound method, in the WS method observed higher percentage of retained aggregates in the size class 8-4.76 mm and, consequently, greater aggregation indexes GMD and WMD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2021v15n2p283-302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Biossistemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2021v15n2p283-302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于超声波的技术可以预测破碎骨料所需的能量,并且更常用于测量骨料的稳定性。虽然它们产生相同的应用能量,但时间和功率的某些组合可能对应于不同强度的空化。因此,不同的超声技术配置可以获得不同的聚合指标响应。因此,这项工作是为了评估在有覆盖植物的管理系统下,空化强度对paludalf骨料分布的影响,并比较骨料稳定性测定方法(超声波和湿法筛分)。将BS(裸土)、OT(黑燕麦+草料萝卜)和OV(黑燕麦+毛叶野豌豆)处理的综合样品以不同的强度和时间组合暴露于超声波辐照下:(U1) 74.5 W/4 s;(U2) 49.7 W/6 s;(U3) 74.5 W/10 s, (U4) 49.7 W/15 s。每次超声处理后,将样品用湿法标准筛法ws(8.00 - 4.76, 4.76 - 2.00, 2.00 - 1.00, 1.00 - 0.25和< 0.25 mm)中的同一组筛过,计算几何平均直径(GMD)和质量加权平均直径(WMD)。振动幅值对土壤击穿的影响大于施加的总能量。与超声法相比,WS法观察到8-4.76 mm粒径级的团聚体保留百分比更高,因此团聚体指数GMD和WMD更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MACROAGGREGATION OF A PALEUDALF AFFECTED BY CAVITATION INTENSITY AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WITH COVER PLANTS
Ultrasonic-based techniques allow the prediction of the energy required to break the aggregate and have been more commonly used to measure the stability of aggregates. Although they result in the same applied energy, certain combinations of time and power might correspond to different intensities of cavitation. Consequently, different responses in aggregation indexes can be obtained with different configurations of ultrasound techniques. Thus, this work was carried out to evaluate the effects of cavitation intensity in the distribution of aggregates of a Paleudalf under management systems with cover plants and to compare aggregate stability determination methods (ultrasound versus wet sieving). Aggregate samples of the BS (bare soil), OT (black oat + forage turnips) and OV (black oat + hairy vetch) treatments were exposed to ultrasonic irradiation in different combinations of potency and time: (U1) 74.5 W/4 s; (U2) 49.7 W/6 s; (U3) 74.5 W/10 s and (U4) 49.7 W/15 s. After each sonification, the samples were passed in the same set of sieves used in the standard method of wet sieving -WS (8.00 - 4.76, 4.76 - 2.00, 2.00 - 1.00, 1.00 - 0.25 and < 0.25 mm) and the geometric mean diameter (GMD) and mass-weighted mean diameter (WMD) were calculated. The amplitude of vibration exerted a greater influence on soil breakdown than the total energy applied. Compared to the ultrasound method, in the WS method observed higher percentage of retained aggregates in the size class 8-4.76 mm and, consequently, greater aggregation indexes GMD and WMD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gypsum-based composites reinforced with bamboo particles Bean yield estimation using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery Cotton responses to potassium fertilization in Northeastern Brazil Soil compaction in progressive agricultural tractor treads Genetic resistance and silicon in the control of stem rot in Capsicum spp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1