彩色多普勒超声联合血管增强技术诊断髂静脉压迫综合征的临床价值

Ya-ping Zhao, Jinwen Zhang, F. Zhai, Ningning Yin, Feng Zhang, Lijian Zhang, Yan E. Zhao
{"title":"彩色多普勒超声联合血管增强技术诊断髂静脉压迫综合征的临床价值","authors":"Ya-ping Zhao, Jinwen Zhang, F. Zhai, Ningning Yin, Feng Zhang, Lijian Zhang, Yan E. Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2020.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound(CDUS) combined with vascular enhancement technology(VET) in diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome(IVCS). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom Jan 2016 to Oct 2018, 252 patients with the lower extremities chronic venous diseases(CVD) were selected in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The ipsilateral iliac veins of the affected limbs were examined by CDUS, VET and the combined diagnosis of IVCS before X-Ray venography(XRV). Iliac vein diameter stenosis ratio(DSR)>50% in transverse section was the criterion of ultrasound diagnosis of IVCS. The stenosis site of iliac vein and indirect signs of IVCS, such as presence of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein were recorded. The cases, which had the same results in CDUS, VET and both and XRV, were divided into IVCS group and non-IVCS group. The results of XRV were taken as the gold standard, the diagnostic efficiency of the above 3 methods in diagnosis of IVCS was calculated. The cases identically diagnosed by the most effective ultrasonic method and XRV were divided into DVT group and non-DVT group according to the deep vein thrombosis in lower limbs. In the non-DVT group, there were five groups of C2-C6 on the basis of the CEAP clinical grades of CVD in lower extremity. The relationship between IVCS and different CEAP clinical grades were analyzed. The locations of common iliac vein stenosis and collateral circulation formation and internal iliac vein reverse flow were evaluated for the diagnosis of the IVCS. \n \n \nResults \n①XRV diagnosis of IVCS was used as the gold standard. Compared with CDUS and VET alone, the sensitivity and specificity of CDUS combined with VET was the highest(all P 0.05). ④For the proportion of the iliac vein stenosis sites, the prevalence of the primary section of left common iliac vein was much higher than those of the primary section of right common iliac vein and the middle-distal sections of bilateral common iliac veins(all P 0.05). ⑤In IVCS group, which had the same results of CDUS combined with VET and XRV, there were statistical differences in the positive rate of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein(χ2=6.717, P=0.010), and the former is higher than the latter. \n \n \nConclusions \nCDUS combined with VET has a higher diagnostic efficiency for IVCS than VET or CDUS alone. The presence of IVCS is closely related to DVT of lower extremities, but not related to clinical class of CEAP. The most common site of IVCS is the initial segment of the left common iliac vein. The presence of collateral circulation can be used as indirect indicators for the diagnosis of IVCS. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography, Doppler, color; Vascular enhancement technology; Iliac vein compression syndrome","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound combined with vascular enhancement technology in the diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Ya-ping Zhao, Jinwen Zhang, F. Zhai, Ningning Yin, Feng Zhang, Lijian Zhang, Yan E. Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2020.02.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound(CDUS) combined with vascular enhancement technology(VET) in diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome(IVCS). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom Jan 2016 to Oct 2018, 252 patients with the lower extremities chronic venous diseases(CVD) were selected in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The ipsilateral iliac veins of the affected limbs were examined by CDUS, VET and the combined diagnosis of IVCS before X-Ray venography(XRV). Iliac vein diameter stenosis ratio(DSR)>50% in transverse section was the criterion of ultrasound diagnosis of IVCS. The stenosis site of iliac vein and indirect signs of IVCS, such as presence of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein were recorded. The cases, which had the same results in CDUS, VET and both and XRV, were divided into IVCS group and non-IVCS group. The results of XRV were taken as the gold standard, the diagnostic efficiency of the above 3 methods in diagnosis of IVCS was calculated. The cases identically diagnosed by the most effective ultrasonic method and XRV were divided into DVT group and non-DVT group according to the deep vein thrombosis in lower limbs. In the non-DVT group, there were five groups of C2-C6 on the basis of the CEAP clinical grades of CVD in lower extremity. The relationship between IVCS and different CEAP clinical grades were analyzed. The locations of common iliac vein stenosis and collateral circulation formation and internal iliac vein reverse flow were evaluated for the diagnosis of the IVCS. \\n \\n \\nResults \\n①XRV diagnosis of IVCS was used as the gold standard. Compared with CDUS and VET alone, the sensitivity and specificity of CDUS combined with VET was the highest(all P 0.05). ④For the proportion of the iliac vein stenosis sites, the prevalence of the primary section of left common iliac vein was much higher than those of the primary section of right common iliac vein and the middle-distal sections of bilateral common iliac veins(all P 0.05). ⑤In IVCS group, which had the same results of CDUS combined with VET and XRV, there were statistical differences in the positive rate of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein(χ2=6.717, P=0.010), and the former is higher than the latter. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nCDUS combined with VET has a higher diagnostic efficiency for IVCS than VET or CDUS alone. The presence of IVCS is closely related to DVT of lower extremities, but not related to clinical class of CEAP. The most common site of IVCS is the initial segment of the left common iliac vein. The presence of collateral circulation can be used as indirect indicators for the diagnosis of IVCS. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nUltrasonography, Doppler, color; Vascular enhancement technology; Iliac vein compression syndrome\",\"PeriodicalId\":10224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华超声影像学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2020.02.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4477.2020.02.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)联合血管增强技术(VET)对髂静脉压迫综合征(IVCS)的诊断价值。方法选择河北医科大学第二医院2016年1月至2018年10月收治的252例下肢慢性静脉病患者。在X射线静脉造影(XRV)前,采用CDUS、VET和IVCS联合诊断对患肢同侧髂静脉进行检查。横切面髂静脉直径狭窄率(DSR)>50%是超声诊断IVCS的标准。记录髂静脉狭窄部位和IVCS的间接体征,如侧支循环和髂内静脉逆行。将CDUS、VET和两者及XRV结果相同的病例分为IVCS组和非IVCS组。以XRV结果为金标准,计算上述3种方法对IVCS的诊断效率。根据下肢深静脉血栓形成情况,将最有效的超声方法和XRV诊断相同的病例分为DVT组和非DVT组。在非DVT组中,根据CEAP下肢CVD的临床分级,有五组C2-C6。分析IVCS与不同CEAP临床分级的关系。评估髂总静脉狭窄、侧支循环形成和髂内静脉回流的位置,以诊断IVCS。结果①以IVCS的XRV诊断为金标准。与单纯CDUS和VET相比,CDUS联合VET的敏感性和特异性最高(均P<0.05),左髂总静脉原发段的发生率明显高于右髂总静脉初发段和双侧髂总静脉中远端段(均P<0.05),侧支循环阳性率与髂内静脉逆行阳性率有统计学差异(χ2=6.717,P=0.010),前者高于后者。结论CDUS联合VET对IVCS的诊断效率高于单独VET或CDUS。IVCS的存在与下肢DVT密切相关,但与CEAP的临床分级无关。IVCS最常见的部位是左侧髂总静脉的起始段。侧支循环的存在可以作为IVCS诊断的间接指标。关键词:超声、多普勒、彩色;血管增强技术;髂静脉压迫综合征
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound combined with vascular enhancement technology in the diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of color Doppler ultrasound(CDUS) combined with vascular enhancement technology(VET) in diagnosis of iliac vein compression syndrome(IVCS). Methods From Jan 2016 to Oct 2018, 252 patients with the lower extremities chronic venous diseases(CVD) were selected in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. The ipsilateral iliac veins of the affected limbs were examined by CDUS, VET and the combined diagnosis of IVCS before X-Ray venography(XRV). Iliac vein diameter stenosis ratio(DSR)>50% in transverse section was the criterion of ultrasound diagnosis of IVCS. The stenosis site of iliac vein and indirect signs of IVCS, such as presence of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein were recorded. The cases, which had the same results in CDUS, VET and both and XRV, were divided into IVCS group and non-IVCS group. The results of XRV were taken as the gold standard, the diagnostic efficiency of the above 3 methods in diagnosis of IVCS was calculated. The cases identically diagnosed by the most effective ultrasonic method and XRV were divided into DVT group and non-DVT group according to the deep vein thrombosis in lower limbs. In the non-DVT group, there were five groups of C2-C6 on the basis of the CEAP clinical grades of CVD in lower extremity. The relationship between IVCS and different CEAP clinical grades were analyzed. The locations of common iliac vein stenosis and collateral circulation formation and internal iliac vein reverse flow were evaluated for the diagnosis of the IVCS. Results ①XRV diagnosis of IVCS was used as the gold standard. Compared with CDUS and VET alone, the sensitivity and specificity of CDUS combined with VET was the highest(all P 0.05). ④For the proportion of the iliac vein stenosis sites, the prevalence of the primary section of left common iliac vein was much higher than those of the primary section of right common iliac vein and the middle-distal sections of bilateral common iliac veins(all P 0.05). ⑤In IVCS group, which had the same results of CDUS combined with VET and XRV, there were statistical differences in the positive rate of collateral circulation and the retrograde flow of internal iliac vein(χ2=6.717, P=0.010), and the former is higher than the latter. Conclusions CDUS combined with VET has a higher diagnostic efficiency for IVCS than VET or CDUS alone. The presence of IVCS is closely related to DVT of lower extremities, but not related to clinical class of CEAP. The most common site of IVCS is the initial segment of the left common iliac vein. The presence of collateral circulation can be used as indirect indicators for the diagnosis of IVCS. Key words: Ultrasonography, Doppler, color; Vascular enhancement technology; Iliac vein compression syndrome
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1