使用六个顶点定位器测定工作长度的“离体”比较研究

Q4 Dentistry Revista Romana de Stomatologie Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.37897/rjs.2023.1.1
Leonardo Tracchegiani, Ş. Manea, Claudia Valentina Lungu, S. Scărlătescu, P. Perlea, A. M. Pangică
{"title":"使用六个顶点定位器测定工作长度的“离体”比较研究","authors":"Leonardo Tracchegiani, Ş. Manea, Claudia Valentina Lungu, S. Scărlătescu, P. Perlea, A. M. Pangică","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2023.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy, precision, and consequently the reliability of five traditional apex locators (AL) and one integrated AL in determining working length (WL). Materials and Methods: The lengths of 15 extracted human teeth were measured with six ALs (Dentaport Root ZX, Dual Pex Micro Mega, Root ZX mini, Elements Diagnostic, Woodpex III, and E-connect S) and with digital radiographs (RVG). Electronic measurements were compared with each other and with radiographic measurements under the same experimental conditions. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between the radiographic and the electronic method. The Root ZX achieved the best accuracy and precision in determining the location of the apical foramen compared to other ALs. Conclusions: ALs are the most reliable method and superior to radiologic methods to determine the WL. Further studies should be performed to assess the differences between different types of ALs.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative ”ex vivo” study on working length determination using six apex locators\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Tracchegiani, Ş. Manea, Claudia Valentina Lungu, S. Scărlătescu, P. Perlea, A. M. Pangică\",\"doi\":\"10.37897/rjs.2023.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy, precision, and consequently the reliability of five traditional apex locators (AL) and one integrated AL in determining working length (WL). Materials and Methods: The lengths of 15 extracted human teeth were measured with six ALs (Dentaport Root ZX, Dual Pex Micro Mega, Root ZX mini, Elements Diagnostic, Woodpex III, and E-connect S) and with digital radiographs (RVG). Electronic measurements were compared with each other and with radiographic measurements under the same experimental conditions. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between the radiographic and the electronic method. The Root ZX achieved the best accuracy and precision in determining the location of the apical foramen compared to other ALs. Conclusions: ALs are the most reliable method and superior to radiologic methods to determine the WL. Further studies should be performed to assess the differences between different types of ALs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是分析五种传统的顶点定位器(AL)和一种集成的顶点定位器在确定工作长度(WL)时的准确性、精度以及可靠性。材料和方法:用6种ALs(Dentaport Root ZX、Dual Pex Micro Mega、Root ZXmini、Elements Diagnostic、Woodpex III和E-connect S)和数字X线片(RVG)测量15颗拔除的人类牙齿的长度。在相同的实验条件下,将电子测量相互比较,并与射线照相测量进行比较。结果:重复测量方差分析显示射线照相法和电子照相法之间存在显著差异。与其他AL相比,Root ZX在确定根尖孔位置方面达到了最佳的准确性和精密度。结论:ALs是最可靠的方法,并且优于放射学方法来确定WL。应进行进一步的研究,以评估不同类型ALs之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative ”ex vivo” study on working length determination using six apex locators
The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy, precision, and consequently the reliability of five traditional apex locators (AL) and one integrated AL in determining working length (WL). Materials and Methods: The lengths of 15 extracted human teeth were measured with six ALs (Dentaport Root ZX, Dual Pex Micro Mega, Root ZX mini, Elements Diagnostic, Woodpex III, and E-connect S) and with digital radiographs (RVG). Electronic measurements were compared with each other and with radiographic measurements under the same experimental conditions. Results: Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between the radiographic and the electronic method. The Root ZX achieved the best accuracy and precision in determining the location of the apical foramen compared to other ALs. Conclusions: ALs are the most reliable method and superior to radiologic methods to determine the WL. Further studies should be performed to assess the differences between different types of ALs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
SEM and EDS comparative studies about the homogeneity of some cements used for luting of posts Ultrastructural studies on implants failure with immediate or late loading The causes of adhesive direct dental restorations failures A systematic review of sinus floor augmentation complications. Does graft type influence the complications rate? The RT-PCR additional value in detecting periodontal pathogens in periodontitis patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1