15M, Podemos和西班牙的长期危机:葛兰西的视角

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/13260219.2022.2170733
Josep Maria Antentas
{"title":"15M, Podemos和西班牙的长期危机:葛兰西的视角","authors":"Josep Maria Antentas","doi":"10.1080/13260219.2022.2170733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the 15M movement and its outcomes through Gramscian lenses. The 15M expressed a crisis of ruling class hegemony based on a crisis of political representation. It was a moment of collective splintering and political subjectivation. Viewed from Gramsci’s distinction between small and big politics, the 15M marked the beginning of a phase in which big politics ceased to be the exclusive prerogative of the dominant classes and shifted towards subaltern groups. The sequence from 15M to Podemos can be analyzed as a cathartic moment in the Gramscian sense of the term and can also be read with the help of his concept of translation. Discussing Machiavelli’s work, Gramsci defined the party as a modern Prince. However, the conception of the party that prevailed in Podemos is narrower than that of Gramsci. His concept of transformism is useful to analyze Podemos’ strategic evolution.","PeriodicalId":41881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 15M, Podemos and the Long Crisis in Spain: Gramscian Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Josep Maria Antentas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13260219.2022.2170733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the 15M movement and its outcomes through Gramscian lenses. The 15M expressed a crisis of ruling class hegemony based on a crisis of political representation. It was a moment of collective splintering and political subjectivation. Viewed from Gramsci’s distinction between small and big politics, the 15M marked the beginning of a phase in which big politics ceased to be the exclusive prerogative of the dominant classes and shifted towards subaltern groups. The sequence from 15M to Podemos can be analyzed as a cathartic moment in the Gramscian sense of the term and can also be read with the help of his concept of translation. Discussing Machiavelli’s work, Gramsci defined the party as a modern Prince. However, the conception of the party that prevailed in Podemos is narrower than that of Gramsci. His concept of transformism is useful to analyze Podemos’ strategic evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2022.2170733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2022.2170733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在通过葛兰西透镜来分析15M运动及其结果。1500万人表达了基于政治代表性危机的统治阶级霸权危机。这是一个集体分裂和政治主观主义的时刻。从葛兰西对小政治和大政治的区分来看,1500万标志着一个阶段的开始,在这个阶段,大政治不再是统治阶级的专属特权,而是转向下级群体。从15M到波德莫斯的序列可以被分析为Gramscian意义上的宣泄时刻,也可以借助他的翻译概念来解读。在讨论马基雅维利的作品时,葛兰西将该党定义为现代王子。然而,波德莫斯占上风的政党的概念比葛兰西的要狭隘。他的转型主义思想有助于分析波德莫斯的战略演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The 15M, Podemos and the Long Crisis in Spain: Gramscian Perspectives
ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the 15M movement and its outcomes through Gramscian lenses. The 15M expressed a crisis of ruling class hegemony based on a crisis of political representation. It was a moment of collective splintering and political subjectivation. Viewed from Gramsci’s distinction between small and big politics, the 15M marked the beginning of a phase in which big politics ceased to be the exclusive prerogative of the dominant classes and shifted towards subaltern groups. The sequence from 15M to Podemos can be analyzed as a cathartic moment in the Gramscian sense of the term and can also be read with the help of his concept of translation. Discussing Machiavelli’s work, Gramsci defined the party as a modern Prince. However, the conception of the party that prevailed in Podemos is narrower than that of Gramsci. His concept of transformism is useful to analyze Podemos’ strategic evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
ABC of a Tragedy: Governance, the Rule of Law and the Failed Implementation of Early Childhood Education in Mexico Specters in the Paraguayan Woods: The Grammar of Secrecy in Hugo Giménez’s Matar a un muerto (2019) The Blind President and a Political Drama in Argentina’s Interwar Politics: The Case of Roberto M. Ortiz and His Attempt at Democratic Redemption The Quest for Visibility and Legibility: Quantifying the Indigenous Population in Brazil in the Late Twentieth Century Legacies of War: Violence, Ecologies, and Kin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1