Deddy Corbuzier在YouTube上的播客中发现的不礼貌策略

Agnes Novalia, Ambalegin Ambalegin
{"title":"Deddy Corbuzier在YouTube上的播客中发现的不礼貌策略","authors":"Agnes Novalia, Ambalegin Ambalegin","doi":"10.24843/e-jl.2022.v16.i01.p14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at determining impoliteness strategies in a talk show entitled Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. In this research, the researchers used a theory from Culpeper (1996). The researcher used qualitative method to analyse the impoliteness strategies in this study. This research used impoliteness strategies. The data source of the research was the talk show Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. This research contained utterances from the conversational dialogues in the talk show. Each utterance had several types of impoliteness strategies. In collecting data, this research used the non-participatory technique and observation method by Sudaryanto (2015). Next, the data analyzed with the pragmatic identification method. This research found 15 data examined from the type of impoliteness strategy and the results were divided into bald on record impoliteness (5 data), positive impoliteness (4 data), negative impoliteness (3 data), mock politeness or sarcasm (2 data), withhold politeness (1 data). The most common strategy used by Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube was bald on record impoliteness.","PeriodicalId":53334,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impoliteness Strategies Found in Deddy Corbuzier's Podcast on YouTube\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Novalia, Ambalegin Ambalegin\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/e-jl.2022.v16.i01.p14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed at determining impoliteness strategies in a talk show entitled Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. In this research, the researchers used a theory from Culpeper (1996). The researcher used qualitative method to analyse the impoliteness strategies in this study. This research used impoliteness strategies. The data source of the research was the talk show Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. This research contained utterances from the conversational dialogues in the talk show. Each utterance had several types of impoliteness strategies. In collecting data, this research used the non-participatory technique and observation method by Sudaryanto (2015). Next, the data analyzed with the pragmatic identification method. This research found 15 data examined from the type of impoliteness strategy and the results were divided into bald on record impoliteness (5 data), positive impoliteness (4 data), negative impoliteness (3 data), mock politeness or sarcasm (2 data), withhold politeness (1 data). The most common strategy used by Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube was bald on record impoliteness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eJournal of Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eJournal of Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2022.v16.i01.p14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2022.v16.i01.p14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项研究旨在确定YouTube上一个名为“戴迪·柯布齐耶”播客的脱口秀节目中的不礼貌策略。在本研究中,研究人员使用了Culpeper(1996)的一个理论。本研究采用定性方法分析了不礼貌行为的策略。这项研究使用了不礼貌策略。该研究的数据来源是YouTube上的脱口秀节目Deddy Corbuzier播客。这项研究包含了谈话节目中会话对话的话语。每句话都有几种不礼貌的策略。在收集数据时,本研究采用了Sudaryanto(2015)的非参与式技术和观察法。其次,用语用识别法对数据进行分析。本研究从不礼貌策略类型中收集了15个数据,并将结果分为直接不礼貌(5个数据)、积极不礼貌(4个数据)、消极不礼貌(3个数据)、嘲笑或讽刺(2个数据)、隐瞒不礼貌(1个数据)。YouTube播客主持人戴迪·柯布齐耶最常用的策略是“秃顶不礼貌”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impoliteness Strategies Found in Deddy Corbuzier's Podcast on YouTube
This study aimed at determining impoliteness strategies in a talk show entitled Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. In this research, the researchers used a theory from Culpeper (1996). The researcher used qualitative method to analyse the impoliteness strategies in this study. This research used impoliteness strategies. The data source of the research was the talk show Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube. This research contained utterances from the conversational dialogues in the talk show. Each utterance had several types of impoliteness strategies. In collecting data, this research used the non-participatory technique and observation method by Sudaryanto (2015). Next, the data analyzed with the pragmatic identification method. This research found 15 data examined from the type of impoliteness strategy and the results were divided into bald on record impoliteness (5 data), positive impoliteness (4 data), negative impoliteness (3 data), mock politeness or sarcasm (2 data), withhold politeness (1 data). The most common strategy used by Deddy Corbuzier podcast on YouTube was bald on record impoliteness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Deixis Analysis Song Lyric of “ Reckless” By Madison Beer The Cooperative Principle in Fate: The Winx Saga Episode 1 Forming of Word in Justin Bieber’s Song Titled “Baby” A Deixis Analysis of Song Divide by Ed Sheeran An Analysis of Students' Writing Anxiety in English Learning at Grade XII MIPA 3 of SMAN 6 Padang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1