商品肉鸡与地方鸡F2杂交体质量性状的基因组评价

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Science Papers and Reports Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/aspr-2023-0003
H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani
{"title":"商品肉鸡与地方鸡F2杂交体质量性状的基因组评价","authors":"H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani","doi":"10.2478/aspr-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.","PeriodicalId":50791,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Papers and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic evaluation of body weight traits in a F2 mixture of commercial broiler and native chicken\",\"authors\":\"H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aspr-2023-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Science Papers and Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Science Papers and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aspr-2023-0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Papers and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aspr-2023-0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要体重性状的遗传改良由于其经济和环境影响而受到家禽业的重视。随着基因组选择(GS)在家禽业的快速实施和基因分型成本的降低,基因组预测(GP)是提高家禽业生产力的可行途径。此外,snp的预先选择可能是加速GP的合理选择。以312只使用60K Illumina芯片进行基因分型的F2肉鸡(488只鸡)为研究对象,研究SNP密度降低对单步基因组BLUP (ssGBLUP)预测2-4周龄体重准确性和偏差的影响。为了研究小等位基因频率(minor allele frequency, MAF)对SNP密度降低的影响,将SNP分为5个亚组,MAF分别为0.05 ~ 0.1、0.1 ~ 0.2、0.2 ~ 0.3、0.3 ~ 0.4和0.4 ~ 0.5。比较了使用60k SNP基因型标准阵列和传统BLUP方法对不同MAF箱基因组预测的准确性和偏差。我们的研究表明,与使用所有snp相比,使用常见snp基因型的子集可以提高基因组预测的准确性,特别是在研究的F2群体中,基因型/表型个体数量有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genomic evaluation of body weight traits in a F2 mixture of commercial broiler and native chicken
Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Science Papers and Reports
Animal Science Papers and Reports 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ANIMAL SCIENCE PAPERS AND REPORTS (Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep.) is an English language quarterly published by the Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec. Papers are welcome reporting studies in all aspects of animal breeding and genetics, reproduction, animal biotechnology, physiology, ethology and welfare. Critical review papers and short reports will also be considered and in justified cases also other original articles dealing with animal science and production.
期刊最新文献
Small ruminant lentivirus-infected dairy goats’ metabolic blood profile in different stages of lactation Production of restructured beef jerky using blood plasma solutions activated by non-thermal atmospheric plasma Localization of embryonic stem cells lacking E-cadherin in a mouse blastocyst Effects of dietary supplementation with algae, sunflower oil, or soybean oil, and age on fat content, fatty acid profile and the expression of related genes in rabbits Lipid sources and emulsifiers in Japanese quail diets as modulators of performance, egg quality and yolk fatty acid profile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1