弥合癌症研究临床前和临床研究之间的差距

R. Kumari
{"title":"弥合癌症研究临床前和临床研究之间的差距","authors":"R. Kumari","doi":"10.31031/NACS.2019.02.000545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of new technologies over the decades the field of Cancer Research has reached its pinnacle of success. Despite the success of basic and pre-clinical cancer research most of the clinical trials do not succeed with expected outcome. Basically, pre-clinical studies play an enormously important role when it comes to decide whether a drug is safe, effective, and ready for clinical trials or not. The evaluation of human specific drugs through pre-clinical studies is extremely crucial for the success of clinical trials. Unfortunately, the translatability of pre-clinical cancer research is significantly low than other therapeutic areas [1-2]. It is now a well-established fact that the clinical trials in cancer have the highest failure rate. Indeed, many significant pre-clinical findings based on which the clinical trials are designed are not actually reproducible [1]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to revisit the pre-clinical cancer research strategies to achieve a greater clinical success.","PeriodicalId":93131,"journal":{"name":"Novel approaches in cancer study","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Gap between Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies in Cancer Research\",\"authors\":\"R. Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.31031/NACS.2019.02.000545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advent of new technologies over the decades the field of Cancer Research has reached its pinnacle of success. Despite the success of basic and pre-clinical cancer research most of the clinical trials do not succeed with expected outcome. Basically, pre-clinical studies play an enormously important role when it comes to decide whether a drug is safe, effective, and ready for clinical trials or not. The evaluation of human specific drugs through pre-clinical studies is extremely crucial for the success of clinical trials. Unfortunately, the translatability of pre-clinical cancer research is significantly low than other therapeutic areas [1-2]. It is now a well-established fact that the clinical trials in cancer have the highest failure rate. Indeed, many significant pre-clinical findings based on which the clinical trials are designed are not actually reproducible [1]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to revisit the pre-clinical cancer research strategies to achieve a greater clinical success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novel approaches in cancer study\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novel approaches in cancer study\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31031/NACS.2019.02.000545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novel approaches in cancer study","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/NACS.2019.02.000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,随着新技术的出现,癌症研究领域已经达到了成功的顶峰。尽管癌症基础和临床前研究取得了成功,但大多数临床试验并没有取得预期结果。基本上,临床前研究在决定一种药物是否安全、有效并准备好进行临床试验时发挥着极其重要的作用。通过临床前研究评估人类特效药对临床试验的成功至关重要。不幸的是,临床前癌症研究的可译性明显低于其他治疗领域[1-2]。癌症的临床试验失败率最高,这是一个公认的事实。事实上,设计临床试验所依据的许多重要的临床前发现实际上是不可重复的[1]。因此,迫切需要重新审视癌症临床前的研究策略,以取得更大的临床成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging the Gap between Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies in Cancer Research
With the advent of new technologies over the decades the field of Cancer Research has reached its pinnacle of success. Despite the success of basic and pre-clinical cancer research most of the clinical trials do not succeed with expected outcome. Basically, pre-clinical studies play an enormously important role when it comes to decide whether a drug is safe, effective, and ready for clinical trials or not. The evaluation of human specific drugs through pre-clinical studies is extremely crucial for the success of clinical trials. Unfortunately, the translatability of pre-clinical cancer research is significantly low than other therapeutic areas [1-2]. It is now a well-established fact that the clinical trials in cancer have the highest failure rate. Indeed, many significant pre-clinical findings based on which the clinical trials are designed are not actually reproducible [1]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to revisit the pre-clinical cancer research strategies to achieve a greater clinical success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Applications of Protein Nanomaterials in Cancer Therapies Anti-Inflammatory Responses of Natural Products in Wounds and Cancer Infections Antimicrobial Peptides in Bladder Cancer The Neoplastic Tonnage-Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma Current Therapeutics and Future Perspectives for Treatment of Advanced BRAF V600 mutant Melanoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1