基于初始假阴性逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的新冠肺炎检测返回急诊科的患者的临床特征。

IF 0.8 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of acute medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.6705/j.jacme.202203_12(1).0004
Eric H. Chou, J. Healy, C. Tzeng, Alec Jessen, M. Hall, C. Patel, Chih-Hung Wang, Tsung-Chien Lu, T. Bhakta, J. Garrett
{"title":"基于初始假阴性逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的新冠肺炎检测返回急诊科的患者的临床特征。","authors":"Eric H. Chou, J. Healy, C. Tzeng, Alec Jessen, M. Hall, C. Patel, Chih-Hung Wang, Tsung-Chien Lu, T. Bhakta, J. Garrett","doi":"10.6705/j.jacme.202203_12(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is an international public health emergency. Early identification of COVID-19 patients with false-negative RT-PCR tests is paramount in the ED to prevent both nosocomial and community transmission. This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics of repeat emergency department (ED) visits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with initial false-negative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based COVID-19 test.\n\n\nMethods\nThis is a retrospective, multi-center, cohort study conducted at 12 hospitals affiliated with Baylor Scott & White Health system. Patients visiting the EDs of these hospitals between June and August 2020 were screened. Patients tested negative for viral RNA by quantitative RT-PCR in the first ED visit and positive in the second ED visit were included. The primary outcome was the comparison of clinical characteristics between two consecutive ED visits including the clinical symptoms, triage vital signs, laboratory, and chest X-ray (CXR) results.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 88 confirmed COVID-19 patients with initial false-negative RT-PCR COVID-19 test in the ED were included in the final analyses. The mean duration of symptoms in the second ED visit was significantly higher (3.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 days, p = 0.020). In the first ED visit, lymphocytopenia (35.2%), fever (32.6%), nausea (29.5%), and dyspnea (27.9%) are the most common signs of COVID-19 infection during the window period. There were significant increases in the rate of hypoxia (13.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.005), abnormal infiltrate on CXR (59.7% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (26.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001) in the second ED visit.\n\n\nConclusions\nEarly COVID-19 testing (less than 3 days of symptom duration) could be associated with a false-negative result. In this window period, lymphocytopenia, fever, nausea, and dyspnea are the most common early signs that can potentially be clinical hints for COVID-19 diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":14846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acute medicine","volume":"12 1 1","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics of Patients Returning to Emergency Department With Initial False-Negative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)-Based COVID-19 Test.\",\"authors\":\"Eric H. Chou, J. Healy, C. Tzeng, Alec Jessen, M. Hall, C. Patel, Chih-Hung Wang, Tsung-Chien Lu, T. Bhakta, J. Garrett\",\"doi\":\"10.6705/j.jacme.202203_12(1).0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is an international public health emergency. Early identification of COVID-19 patients with false-negative RT-PCR tests is paramount in the ED to prevent both nosocomial and community transmission. This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics of repeat emergency department (ED) visits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with initial false-negative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based COVID-19 test.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nThis is a retrospective, multi-center, cohort study conducted at 12 hospitals affiliated with Baylor Scott & White Health system. Patients visiting the EDs of these hospitals between June and August 2020 were screened. Patients tested negative for viral RNA by quantitative RT-PCR in the first ED visit and positive in the second ED visit were included. The primary outcome was the comparison of clinical characteristics between two consecutive ED visits including the clinical symptoms, triage vital signs, laboratory, and chest X-ray (CXR) results.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nA total of 88 confirmed COVID-19 patients with initial false-negative RT-PCR COVID-19 test in the ED were included in the final analyses. The mean duration of symptoms in the second ED visit was significantly higher (3.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 days, p = 0.020). In the first ED visit, lymphocytopenia (35.2%), fever (32.6%), nausea (29.5%), and dyspnea (27.9%) are the most common signs of COVID-19 infection during the window period. There were significant increases in the rate of hypoxia (13.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.005), abnormal infiltrate on CXR (59.7% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (26.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001) in the second ED visit.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nEarly COVID-19 testing (less than 3 days of symptom duration) could be associated with a false-negative result. In this window period, lymphocytopenia, fever, nausea, and dyspnea are the most common early signs that can potentially be clinical hints for COVID-19 diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of acute medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1 1\",\"pages\":\"29-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of acute medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202203_12(1).0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acute medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6705/j.jacme.202203_12(1).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)暴发是一次国际突发公共卫生事件。用假阴性RT-PCR检测早期识别新冠肺炎患者在ED中至关重要,以防止医院和社区传播。本研究旨在比较2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)患者重复急诊科(ED)就诊的临床特征,这些患者的初始逆转录酶聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)检测结果为假阴性。方法这是一项回顾性、多中心、队列研究,在贝勒-斯科特和怀特卫生系统下属的12家医院进行。对2020年6月至8月期间访问这些医院急诊室的患者进行了筛查。包括第一次急诊就诊时通过定量RT-PCR检测病毒RNA呈阴性的患者和第二次急诊就诊中呈阳性的患者。主要结果是比较两次连续急诊就诊的临床特征,包括临床症状、生命体征分类、实验室和胸部X光检查(CXR)结果。结果共有88名在ED中进行了初步假阴性RT-PCR新冠肺炎检测的新冠肺炎确诊患者被纳入最终分析。第二次急诊就诊的症状平均持续时间显著增加(3.6±0.4天vs.2.6±0.3天,p=0.020)。在第一次急诊就诊中,淋巴细胞减少(35.2%)、发烧(32.6%)、恶心(29.5%)和呼吸困难(27.9%)是窗口期新冠肺炎感染最常见的症状。在第二次ED访视中,缺氧率(13.6%对4.6%,p=0.005)、CXR异常浸润率(59.7%对25.9%,p<0.001)和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)升高率(26.1%对9.1%,<0.001)显著增加。结论早期新冠肺炎检测(症状持续时间少于3天)可能与假阴性结果相关。在这个窗口期,淋巴细胞减少、发烧、恶心和呼吸困难是最常见的早期迹象,可能是新冠肺炎诊断的临床提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Characteristics of Patients Returning to Emergency Department With Initial False-Negative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)-Based COVID-19 Test.
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is an international public health emergency. Early identification of COVID-19 patients with false-negative RT-PCR tests is paramount in the ED to prevent both nosocomial and community transmission. This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics of repeat emergency department (ED) visits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with initial false-negative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based COVID-19 test. Methods This is a retrospective, multi-center, cohort study conducted at 12 hospitals affiliated with Baylor Scott & White Health system. Patients visiting the EDs of these hospitals between June and August 2020 were screened. Patients tested negative for viral RNA by quantitative RT-PCR in the first ED visit and positive in the second ED visit were included. The primary outcome was the comparison of clinical characteristics between two consecutive ED visits including the clinical symptoms, triage vital signs, laboratory, and chest X-ray (CXR) results. Results A total of 88 confirmed COVID-19 patients with initial false-negative RT-PCR COVID-19 test in the ED were included in the final analyses. The mean duration of symptoms in the second ED visit was significantly higher (3.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.3 days, p = 0.020). In the first ED visit, lymphocytopenia (35.2%), fever (32.6%), nausea (29.5%), and dyspnea (27.9%) are the most common signs of COVID-19 infection during the window period. There were significant increases in the rate of hypoxia (13.6% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.005), abnormal infiltrate on CXR (59.7% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (26.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001) in the second ED visit. Conclusions Early COVID-19 testing (less than 3 days of symptom duration) could be associated with a false-negative result. In this window period, lymphocytopenia, fever, nausea, and dyspnea are the most common early signs that can potentially be clinical hints for COVID-19 diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of acute medicine
Journal of acute medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
International Collaboration in Taiwan Emergency Department Publications: A Social Network Analysis. Left Ventricular Perforation Following Transcutaneous Pigtail Catheter Placement Mimicking Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction: An Unusual Complication. Review of Emamectin Benzoate Poisoning. The Effect of a Separate Flow of Patients With Small Traumatic Injuries on Consult Time and Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Cohort Study During COVID-19 in the Emergency Department. Woman With Recurrent Syncope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1