通过自由支配和非歧视性旅行模拟儿童的独立领土范围

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transport and Land Use Pub Date : 2021-03-14 DOI:10.5198/JTLU.2021.1889
Samia Sharmin, M. Kamruzzaman, M. Haque
{"title":"通过自由支配和非歧视性旅行模拟儿童的独立领土范围","authors":"Samia Sharmin, M. Kamruzzaman, M. Haque","doi":"10.5198/JTLU.2021.1889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decline of children’s independent mobility (CIM) is now a global concern. This study aims to identify the determinants of the territorial range (TR) of CIM, i.e., the geographical distance between home and places where children are allowed to wander. TR for both discretionary and nondiscretionary trips is studied based on data collected through a questionnaire survey, travel diary, and mapping of travel routes. The study sample was comprised of 151 children 9-14 years of age from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Built environment (BE) data were collected/derived through walkability audits of children’s walking routes and spatial analyses. Children’s TR was regressed by BE, socio-demographics, and perceptual factors. Three multiple regression models were estimated: overall TR, discretionary TR, and nondiscretionary TR. Results showed that children had a longer TR for nondiscretionary trips (664.14 m) compared to discretionary trips (397.9 m). Discretionary TR was largely explained by angular step-depth, street connectivity and the condition of the walking environment of the taken routes. In contrast, angular step-depth, the presence of commercial and retail land uses and the condition of the walking environment were found to be significant predictors of nondiscretionary TR. Children’s perception of social and physical dangers and their satisfaction with tree coverage in the neighborhood also influenced their TR. The findings can inform measures to be taken to expand TR in the urban environment.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling children’s independent territorial range by discretionary and nondiscretionary trips\",\"authors\":\"Samia Sharmin, M. Kamruzzaman, M. Haque\",\"doi\":\"10.5198/JTLU.2021.1889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decline of children’s independent mobility (CIM) is now a global concern. This study aims to identify the determinants of the territorial range (TR) of CIM, i.e., the geographical distance between home and places where children are allowed to wander. TR for both discretionary and nondiscretionary trips is studied based on data collected through a questionnaire survey, travel diary, and mapping of travel routes. The study sample was comprised of 151 children 9-14 years of age from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Built environment (BE) data were collected/derived through walkability audits of children’s walking routes and spatial analyses. Children’s TR was regressed by BE, socio-demographics, and perceptual factors. Three multiple regression models were estimated: overall TR, discretionary TR, and nondiscretionary TR. Results showed that children had a longer TR for nondiscretionary trips (664.14 m) compared to discretionary trips (397.9 m). Discretionary TR was largely explained by angular step-depth, street connectivity and the condition of the walking environment of the taken routes. In contrast, angular step-depth, the presence of commercial and retail land uses and the condition of the walking environment were found to be significant predictors of nondiscretionary TR. Children’s perception of social and physical dangers and their satisfaction with tree coverage in the neighborhood also influenced their TR. The findings can inform measures to be taken to expand TR in the urban environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport and Land Use\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport and Land Use\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5198/JTLU.2021.1889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/JTLU.2021.1889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

儿童独立行动能力的下降已成为全球关注的问题。本研究旨在确定CIM的领土范围(TR)的决定因素,即家与允许儿童活动的地方之间的地理距离。根据问卷调查、旅行日记和旅行路线地图收集的数据,研究了自由和非自由旅行的TR。研究样本由来自孟加拉国达卡的151名9-14岁儿童组成。通过对儿童步行路线的可步行性审计和空间分析,收集/导出了建筑环境(BE)数据。通过BE、社会人口统计学和知觉因素对儿童TR进行回归。结果表明,儿童在非任定性行程中的总行程(664.14 m)比任定性行程(397.9 m)要长,任定性行程在很大程度上与角台阶深度、街道连通性和所选路线的步行环境条件有关。相比之下,角阶深、商业和零售用地的存在以及步行环境的条件被发现是非随意TR的重要预测因子。儿童对社会和物理危险的感知以及他们对社区树木覆盖的满意度也影响他们的TR。研究结果可以为采取措施扩大城市环境中的TR提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling children’s independent territorial range by discretionary and nondiscretionary trips
The decline of children’s independent mobility (CIM) is now a global concern. This study aims to identify the determinants of the territorial range (TR) of CIM, i.e., the geographical distance between home and places where children are allowed to wander. TR for both discretionary and nondiscretionary trips is studied based on data collected through a questionnaire survey, travel diary, and mapping of travel routes. The study sample was comprised of 151 children 9-14 years of age from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Built environment (BE) data were collected/derived through walkability audits of children’s walking routes and spatial analyses. Children’s TR was regressed by BE, socio-demographics, and perceptual factors. Three multiple regression models were estimated: overall TR, discretionary TR, and nondiscretionary TR. Results showed that children had a longer TR for nondiscretionary trips (664.14 m) compared to discretionary trips (397.9 m). Discretionary TR was largely explained by angular step-depth, street connectivity and the condition of the walking environment of the taken routes. In contrast, angular step-depth, the presence of commercial and retail land uses and the condition of the walking environment were found to be significant predictors of nondiscretionary TR. Children’s perception of social and physical dangers and their satisfaction with tree coverage in the neighborhood also influenced their TR. The findings can inform measures to be taken to expand TR in the urban environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Access-based land value appreciation for assessing project benefits Revealing social dimensions of urban mobility with big data: A timely dialogue Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries Does rail transit access affect firm dynamics? Analysis of firm births and closures in Maryland, USA Incorporating diminishing returns to opportunities in access: Development of an open-source walkability index based on multi-activity accessibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1