WRF模式在热带地区的性能评估:不同地点的风速分析

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Atmosfera Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.20937/atm.52968
Noéle Bissoli Perini Souza, E. G. S. Nascimento, D. Moreira
{"title":"WRF模式在热带地区的性能评估:不同地点的风速分析","authors":"Noéle Bissoli Perini Souza, E. G. S. Nascimento, D. Moreira","doi":"10.20937/atm.52968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the performance of the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is evaluated using combinations of three Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) and three Land Surface Model (LSM) schemes, in order to identify the optimal parameters for the determination of wind speed in a tropical region. The state of Bahia in Brazil is selected as the location for the case study and simulations are performed over a period of eight months between 2015 and 2016. This is done to ensure that the dry and rainy seasons at the three different experimental sites—Esplanada, Mucuri, and Mucugê—are well separated from each other. The results of the simulations are compared with the observational data obtained from three towers equipped with anemometers at heights of 80, 100, 120 and 150 m, strategically placed at each site. Overestimation of wind speed is observed in the simulations, despite similarities between the simulated and observed wind directions. In addition, the accuracies of simulations corresponding to sites that are closer to the ocean are observed to be lower—the most accurate wind speed estimates are obtained corresponding to Mucugê, which is located farthest from the ocean. Finally, analysis of the results obtained from each tower accounting for periods with higher and lower precipitation reveals that the combination of the PBL-YSU scheme with the LSM-RUC scheme yields the best results.","PeriodicalId":55576,"journal":{"name":"Atmosfera","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of the WRF model in a tropical region: wind speed analysis at different sites\",\"authors\":\"Noéle Bissoli Perini Souza, E. G. S. Nascimento, D. Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.20937/atm.52968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the performance of the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is evaluated using combinations of three Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) and three Land Surface Model (LSM) schemes, in order to identify the optimal parameters for the determination of wind speed in a tropical region. The state of Bahia in Brazil is selected as the location for the case study and simulations are performed over a period of eight months between 2015 and 2016. This is done to ensure that the dry and rainy seasons at the three different experimental sites—Esplanada, Mucuri, and Mucugê—are well separated from each other. The results of the simulations are compared with the observational data obtained from three towers equipped with anemometers at heights of 80, 100, 120 and 150 m, strategically placed at each site. Overestimation of wind speed is observed in the simulations, despite similarities between the simulated and observed wind directions. In addition, the accuracies of simulations corresponding to sites that are closer to the ocean are observed to be lower—the most accurate wind speed estimates are obtained corresponding to Mucugê, which is located farthest from the ocean. Finally, analysis of the results obtained from each tower accounting for periods with higher and lower precipitation reveals that the combination of the PBL-YSU scheme with the LSM-RUC scheme yields the best results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmosfera\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmosfera\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.52968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmosfera","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.52968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本研究中,使用三种行星边界层(PBL)和三种陆地表面模式(LSM)方案的组合来评估中尺度天气研究和预报(WRF)模式的性能,以确定确定热带地区风速的最佳参数。选择巴西巴伊亚州作为案例研究的地点,并在2015年至2016年的八个月内进行了模拟。这样做是为了确保Esplanada、Mucuri和Mucugê这三个不同实验点的旱季和雨季能够很好地分开。模拟结果与从三座高度分别为80、100、120和150米的装有风速计的塔架获得的观测数据进行了比较,这三座塔架战略性地放置在每个地点。尽管模拟和观测到的风向相似,但在模拟中观察到对风速的过度估计。此外,据观察,与距离海洋较近的地点相对应的模拟精度较低——最准确的风速估计值是与距离海洋最远的Mucugê相对应的。最后,对考虑降水量较高和较低时期的每个塔的结果进行分析表明,PBL-YSU方案与LSM-RUC方案的组合产生了最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation of the WRF model in a tropical region: wind speed analysis at different sites
In this study, the performance of the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is evaluated using combinations of three Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) and three Land Surface Model (LSM) schemes, in order to identify the optimal parameters for the determination of wind speed in a tropical region. The state of Bahia in Brazil is selected as the location for the case study and simulations are performed over a period of eight months between 2015 and 2016. This is done to ensure that the dry and rainy seasons at the three different experimental sites—Esplanada, Mucuri, and Mucugê—are well separated from each other. The results of the simulations are compared with the observational data obtained from three towers equipped with anemometers at heights of 80, 100, 120 and 150 m, strategically placed at each site. Overestimation of wind speed is observed in the simulations, despite similarities between the simulated and observed wind directions. In addition, the accuracies of simulations corresponding to sites that are closer to the ocean are observed to be lower—the most accurate wind speed estimates are obtained corresponding to Mucugê, which is located farthest from the ocean. Finally, analysis of the results obtained from each tower accounting for periods with higher and lower precipitation reveals that the combination of the PBL-YSU scheme with the LSM-RUC scheme yields the best results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmosfera
Atmosfera 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ATMÓSFERA seeks contributions on theoretical, basic, empirical and applied research in all the areas of atmospheric sciences, with emphasis on meteorology, climatology, aeronomy, physics, chemistry, and aerobiology. Interdisciplinary contributions are also accepted; especially those related with oceanography, hydrology, climate variability and change, ecology, forestry, glaciology, agriculture, environmental pollution, and other topics related to economy and society as they are affected by atmospheric hazards.
期刊最新文献
Subsurface temperature change attributed to climate change at the northern latitude site of Kapuskasing, Canada Development of a CFD model to simulate the dispersion of atmospheric NH3 in a semi-open barn Using a hybrid approach for wind power forecasting in Northwestern Mexico Threats to tropical wetlands: Medio Queso Wetland as a case of degraded system Performance evaluation of the WRF model under different physical schemes for air quality purposes in Buenos Aires, Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1