诊断新冠肺炎:检测SARS-CoV-2基因组E基因的诊断重要性

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 VIROLOGY Future Virology Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.2217/fvl-2021-0330
I. Barjaktarović, J. Maletić, N. Vučinić, A. Milutinović, M. Grujicic, V. Čabarkapa
{"title":"诊断新冠肺炎:检测SARS-CoV-2基因组E基因的诊断重要性","authors":"I. Barjaktarović, J. Maletić, N. Vučinić, A. Milutinović, M. Grujicic, V. Čabarkapa","doi":"10.2217/fvl-2021-0330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the significance of E gene analysis in addition to N and RdRp genes of SARS-CoV-2, and to compare the specificity and sensitivity of targets. Materials & methods: We used two reverse transcription-PCR assays: one targeting N, E and RdRp and the other targeting N and RdRp genes and analyzed variation in threshold cycle (Ct) values. Results: Of the 155 samples, 70.32% tested positive: all three genes were detected in 45.87%, N and RdRp in 19.27% and only N in 34.86%. Patients negative for the E gene were tested after symptoms disappeared and Ct values were significantly higher. Conclusion: Samples negative for the E gene were potentially false positive and clinical conditions should be assessed while interpreting results.","PeriodicalId":12505,"journal":{"name":"Future Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing COVID-19: diagnostic importance of detecting E gene of the SARS-CoV-2 genome\",\"authors\":\"I. Barjaktarović, J. Maletić, N. Vučinić, A. Milutinović, M. Grujicic, V. Čabarkapa\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/fvl-2021-0330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate the significance of E gene analysis in addition to N and RdRp genes of SARS-CoV-2, and to compare the specificity and sensitivity of targets. Materials & methods: We used two reverse transcription-PCR assays: one targeting N, E and RdRp and the other targeting N and RdRp genes and analyzed variation in threshold cycle (Ct) values. Results: Of the 155 samples, 70.32% tested positive: all three genes were detected in 45.87%, N and RdRp in 19.27% and only N in 34.86%. Patients negative for the E gene were tested after symptoms disappeared and Ct values were significantly higher. Conclusion: Samples negative for the E gene were potentially false positive and clinical conditions should be assessed while interpreting results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Virology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2021-0330\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2021-0330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价除N和RdRp基因外的E基因分析对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的意义,并比较靶点的特异性和敏感性。材料与方法:我们使用了两种逆转录PCR检测:一种针对N、E和RdRp基因,另一种则针对N和RdRp基因,并分析了阈值周期(Ct)值的变化。结果:在155份样本中,70.32%的样本检测呈阳性:三种基因均检测出45.87%,N和RdRp检测出19.27%,仅N检测出34.86%。结论:E基因阴性的样本可能是假阳性,在解释结果时应评估临床情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosing COVID-19: diagnostic importance of detecting E gene of the SARS-CoV-2 genome
Aim: To evaluate the significance of E gene analysis in addition to N and RdRp genes of SARS-CoV-2, and to compare the specificity and sensitivity of targets. Materials & methods: We used two reverse transcription-PCR assays: one targeting N, E and RdRp and the other targeting N and RdRp genes and analyzed variation in threshold cycle (Ct) values. Results: Of the 155 samples, 70.32% tested positive: all three genes were detected in 45.87%, N and RdRp in 19.27% and only N in 34.86%. Patients negative for the E gene were tested after symptoms disappeared and Ct values were significantly higher. Conclusion: Samples negative for the E gene were potentially false positive and clinical conditions should be assessed while interpreting results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Virology
Future Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Virology is a peer-reviewed journal that delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this ever-expanding area of research. It is an interdisciplinary forum for all scientists working in the field today.
期刊最新文献
A review: cellular attachment and entry factors of human tumor-associated viruses Exploration of the cross-immunity between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in mice It's time for a booster: here's your 19th dose of Future Virology! Post-COVID-19 symptom burden: treatment with Forsythiae Fructus Conference proceedings from the 26th Bangkok International Symposium on HIV Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1