公民革命:不列颠哥伦比亚省在线法庭的用户体验

Katie Sykes, Rebecca Dickson, Sarah Ewart, Candice Foulkes, Marina Landry
{"title":"公民革命:不列颠哥伦比亚省在线法庭的用户体验","authors":"Katie Sykes, Rebecca Dickson, Sarah Ewart, Candice Foulkes, Marina Landry","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"British Columbia’s new Civil Resolution Tribunal [CRT] is a primarily online dispute resolution system that has attracted international attention for its innovative approach.  But so far there has been little independent research on the effectiveness of the CRT and similar online dispute resolution initiatives in providing access to justice.  In a qualitative and exploratory study, we surveyed 49 British Columbians who had used the CRT about their experience with the process.  Overall, the results suggest that the CRT has improved access to justice, but the survey answers also identified problems and concerns, for which we suggest potential solutions. ","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia’s Online Court\",\"authors\":\"Katie Sykes, Rebecca Dickson, Sarah Ewart, Candice Foulkes, Marina Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"British Columbia’s new Civil Resolution Tribunal [CRT] is a primarily online dispute resolution system that has attracted international attention for its innovative approach.  But so far there has been little independent research on the effectiveness of the CRT and similar online dispute resolution initiatives in providing access to justice.  In a qualitative and exploratory study, we surveyed 49 British Columbians who had used the CRT about their experience with the process.  Overall, the results suggest that the CRT has improved access to justice, but the survey answers also identified problems and concerns, for which we suggest potential solutions. \",\"PeriodicalId\":56232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不列颠哥伦比亚省新的民事解决法庭(CRT)是一个主要的在线争议解决系统,因其创新的方法而吸引了国际关注。但到目前为止,几乎没有关于CRT和类似的在线争议解决方案在提供诉诸司法方面的有效性的独立研究。在一项定性和探索性研究中,我们调查了49名使用过CRT的不列颠哥伦比亚人,了解他们在这一过程中的经历。总体而言,结果表明,CRT改善了诉诸司法的机会,但调查的答案也发现了问题和关切,对此我们提出了潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia’s Online Court
British Columbia’s new Civil Resolution Tribunal [CRT] is a primarily online dispute resolution system that has attracted international attention for its innovative approach.  But so far there has been little independent research on the effectiveness of the CRT and similar online dispute resolution initiatives in providing access to justice.  In a qualitative and exploratory study, we surveyed 49 British Columbians who had used the CRT about their experience with the process.  Overall, the results suggest that the CRT has improved access to justice, but the survey answers also identified problems and concerns, for which we suggest potential solutions. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1