作业指导与治疗过程依从性评估:对治疗师言语行为的分析

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Universitas Psychologica Pub Date : 2020-07-23 DOI:10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY19.HICA
Carlos Marchena Giráldez, M. X. Froxán Parga, Ana Calero Elvira
{"title":"作业指导与治疗过程依从性评估:对治疗师言语行为的分析","authors":"Carlos Marchena Giráldez, M. X. Froxán Parga, Ana Calero Elvira","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY19.HICA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instructions are a common resource used by behavioral therapists to assign therapeutic homework. However, understanding how clients learn with instructions is better known in laboratory research than in clinical research. The present study aims to explore changes in the way of instructing and reviewing the client’s compliance throughout the therapeutic process. We analyzed the therapist’s verbal behavior during 211 recorded sessions corresponding to 19 cases treated by 11 behavioral therapists (53% male and 47% female). The sessions were divided into four stages according to the timing of the intervention and coded by using a previously validated coding system (SYST-INTER-INSTR). Results show that instructions become less specific towards the last stage of the intervention. However, therapists assess task compliance in the same way towards the end of the therapeutic process. The change in specificity suggests that the client’s behavior changes from being controlled by instructions to being controlled by natural contingencies. However, to make sure the clinical change remains; therapists assess and reinforce the client’s compliance until the end of the intervention. Although clinical implications of the results, some limitations (i.e., not considering the type of task instructed) should be addressed in future studies.","PeriodicalId":47141,"journal":{"name":"Universitas Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homework Instructions and Compliance Assessing in the Therapeutic Process: An Analysis of Therapists’ Verbal Behavior\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Marchena Giráldez, M. X. Froxán Parga, Ana Calero Elvira\",\"doi\":\"10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY19.HICA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instructions are a common resource used by behavioral therapists to assign therapeutic homework. However, understanding how clients learn with instructions is better known in laboratory research than in clinical research. The present study aims to explore changes in the way of instructing and reviewing the client’s compliance throughout the therapeutic process. We analyzed the therapist’s verbal behavior during 211 recorded sessions corresponding to 19 cases treated by 11 behavioral therapists (53% male and 47% female). The sessions were divided into four stages according to the timing of the intervention and coded by using a previously validated coding system (SYST-INTER-INSTR). Results show that instructions become less specific towards the last stage of the intervention. However, therapists assess task compliance in the same way towards the end of the therapeutic process. The change in specificity suggests that the client’s behavior changes from being controlled by instructions to being controlled by natural contingencies. However, to make sure the clinical change remains; therapists assess and reinforce the client’s compliance until the end of the intervention. Although clinical implications of the results, some limitations (i.e., not considering the type of task instructed) should be addressed in future studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY19.HICA\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.UPSY19.HICA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

指导是行为治疗师用来布置治疗作业的常见资源。然而,了解客户如何按照指示学习在实验室研究中比在临床研究中更为人所知。本研究旨在探索在整个治疗过程中指导和审查客户依从性的方式的变化。我们分析了治疗师在211次记录会话中的言语行为,对应于11名行为治疗师治疗的19例(53%为男性,47%为女性)。根据干预时间将会话分为四个阶段,并使用先前验证的编码系统(SYST-INTER-INSTR)进行编码。结果表明,在干预的最后阶段,指示变得不那么具体。然而,治疗师在治疗过程结束时以同样的方式评估任务依从性。特异性的变化表明,客户的行为从受指令控制转变为受自然突发事件控制。然而,为了确保临床变化仍然存在;治疗师评估并加强客户的依从性,直到干预结束。尽管结果具有临床意义,但在未来的研究中应解决一些局限性(即不考虑所指示的任务类型)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Homework Instructions and Compliance Assessing in the Therapeutic Process: An Analysis of Therapists’ Verbal Behavior
Instructions are a common resource used by behavioral therapists to assign therapeutic homework. However, understanding how clients learn with instructions is better known in laboratory research than in clinical research. The present study aims to explore changes in the way of instructing and reviewing the client’s compliance throughout the therapeutic process. We analyzed the therapist’s verbal behavior during 211 recorded sessions corresponding to 19 cases treated by 11 behavioral therapists (53% male and 47% female). The sessions were divided into four stages according to the timing of the intervention and coded by using a previously validated coding system (SYST-INTER-INSTR). Results show that instructions become less specific towards the last stage of the intervention. However, therapists assess task compliance in the same way towards the end of the therapeutic process. The change in specificity suggests that the client’s behavior changes from being controlled by instructions to being controlled by natural contingencies. However, to make sure the clinical change remains; therapists assess and reinforce the client’s compliance until the end of the intervention. Although clinical implications of the results, some limitations (i.e., not considering the type of task instructed) should be addressed in future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas Psychologica
Universitas Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Universitas Psychologica es una revista científica trimestral con un amplio espectro temático y teórico. Es una publicación de carácter general y plural en la medida en que incluye trabajos originales, en inglés o español, de los diversos enfoques de la psicología y de sus distintos campos de aplicación. Cada año un número especial es dedicado a un tópico específico de distintas áreas de la psicología (número monográfico). El propósito de Universitas es convertirse en un fuente importante de consulta a nivel mundial y en un referente permanente de visibilidad e intercambio.
期刊最新文献
Vías de atención a pacientes con un primer episodio de psicosis: Un estudio multicéntrico y multiétnico Toxic Leadership and Followers’ Work Motivation: An Angolan Study Apego y vejez, una nueva perspectiva para la comprensión del bienestar y la regulación emocional en los mayores. Sesenta años de una Facultad expresados en veinte años de una revista: Sección Especial Monográfica Universitas Psychologica Veinte años tejiendo un libro infinito: Universitas Psychologica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1