宇宙学与卢克莱修的生物模型:表达世界的统一

Anne Claire Joncheray
{"title":"宇宙学与卢克莱修的生物模型:表达世界的统一","authors":"Anne Claire Joncheray","doi":"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2023/01/003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article tackles the issue of the unity and cohesion of the world as it is evoked by Lucretius in the De Rerum Natura. Through this work, we would like to show that the philosopher offers an original solution to this question by using a biological model: the organic unity. This model plays a dual role, both critical and descriptive. First, it replaces what Lucretius identifies as ‘false models’ of the union and cohesion of the world: the model of the world as living based on the theory of the soul of the world, the model of the world as divine, rested on demiurgic and providential theories and finally the model of the world as principle, elaborated from the thesis of the eternity of the world and its parts. Then, by evicting these three models of explanation and description of the cohesion of the parts of the world, based on a bad definition of the nature of the world, the Lucretian biological model proposes a re-description of the unity of the world which is compatible with the Epicurean cosmological theses of the plurality of worlds and of the mortality of the world.","PeriodicalId":38538,"journal":{"name":"Lexis (Peru)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmology and the Biological Model in Lucretius: Expressing the Unity of the World\",\"authors\":\"Anne Claire Joncheray\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2023/01/003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article tackles the issue of the unity and cohesion of the world as it is evoked by Lucretius in the De Rerum Natura. Through this work, we would like to show that the philosopher offers an original solution to this question by using a biological model: the organic unity. This model plays a dual role, both critical and descriptive. First, it replaces what Lucretius identifies as ‘false models’ of the union and cohesion of the world: the model of the world as living based on the theory of the soul of the world, the model of the world as divine, rested on demiurgic and providential theories and finally the model of the world as principle, elaborated from the thesis of the eternity of the world and its parts. Then, by evicting these three models of explanation and description of the cohesion of the parts of the world, based on a bad definition of the nature of the world, the Lucretian biological model proposes a re-description of the unity of the world which is compatible with the Epicurean cosmological theses of the plurality of worlds and of the mortality of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lexis (Peru)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lexis (Peru)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2023/01/003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexis (Peru)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/lexis/2724-1564/2023/01/003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文处理的统一和凝聚力的问题,因为它是唤起卢克莱修在自然论。通过这项工作,我们想表明哲学家通过使用生物学模型:有机统一,为这个问题提供了一个原始的解决方案。这个模型起着双重作用,既是批判性的,也是描述性的。首先,它取代了卢克莱修认为的世界联合和凝聚的“错误模型”:世界是基于世界灵魂理论的生活模型,世界是神圣的模型,建立在上帝和上帝的理论上,最后,世界是原则的模型,从世界的永恒性及其组成部分的论点中阐述出来。然后,通过排除这三种解释和描述世界各部分凝聚力的模型,基于对世界本质的错误定义,卢克雷安的生物学模型提出了对世界统一性的重新描述,这与伊壁鸠鲁关于世界多元性和世界必死性的宇宙学论点是相容的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cosmology and the Biological Model in Lucretius: Expressing the Unity of the World
The present article tackles the issue of the unity and cohesion of the world as it is evoked by Lucretius in the De Rerum Natura. Through this work, we would like to show that the philosopher offers an original solution to this question by using a biological model: the organic unity. This model plays a dual role, both critical and descriptive. First, it replaces what Lucretius identifies as ‘false models’ of the union and cohesion of the world: the model of the world as living based on the theory of the soul of the world, the model of the world as divine, rested on demiurgic and providential theories and finally the model of the world as principle, elaborated from the thesis of the eternity of the world and its parts. Then, by evicting these three models of explanation and description of the cohesion of the parts of the world, based on a bad definition of the nature of the world, the Lucretian biological model proposes a re-description of the unity of the world which is compatible with the Epicurean cosmological theses of the plurality of worlds and of the mortality of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lexis (Peru)
Lexis (Peru) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Ciceronian Elements in Virgil: The Incipit of the First Bucolic Montserrat Jufresa, Francesca Mestre (eds). ΑΠΟΙΝΑ / àpoina. Estudis de literatura grega dedicats a Carles Miralles Giampaolo Galvani. Agamennone. I canti. Eschilo Romolo-Quirino in Enn. ann. 100 Skutsch Ettore Romagnoli’s Horace in Black Orbace Rereading – with Digressions - the Bimillennial Conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1