在使用、复制和创新之间。波兰低地(Kuyavia)的球形双耳瓶文化对新石器时代石器工业研究的贡献

Q2 Arts and Humanities Sprawozdania Archeologiczne Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.23858/sa/74.2022.1.3072
P. Chachlikowski
{"title":"在使用、复制和创新之间。波兰低地(Kuyavia)的球形双耳瓶文化对新石器时代石器工业研究的贡献","authors":"P. Chachlikowski","doi":"10.23858/sa/74.2022.1.3072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on a section of studies on the Globular Amphorae Culture (GAC) stone production in Kuyavia. The source materials from this area provide evidence of heretofore unknown activity of stone workers of this culture engaged in production of adzes that copied the forms typical of Late Band Pottery Culture. The resulting observations challenge the view that GAC communities did not produce stone adzes of their own, but allegedly restricted themselves only to using ready-made adzes of other Neolithic cultures. The sources under discussion also provide documented information on an innovative contribution of Kuyavian GAC stone workers in the assortment of tool products. This assortment includes polishing plates with the shapes and dimensions that essentially differentiated them from the corresponding tools used in the area in the Neolithic. Nevertheless, the claim that the local GAC communities did not produce type of the stone adze that would be characteristic of their own still remains as valid as ever.\n ","PeriodicalId":37678,"journal":{"name":"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between the use, copying and innovation. A contribution to the studies on the stone tool industry in Neolithic societies of the Globular Amphora Culture in the Polish Lowland (Kuyavia)\",\"authors\":\"P. Chachlikowski\",\"doi\":\"10.23858/sa/74.2022.1.3072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on a section of studies on the Globular Amphorae Culture (GAC) stone production in Kuyavia. The source materials from this area provide evidence of heretofore unknown activity of stone workers of this culture engaged in production of adzes that copied the forms typical of Late Band Pottery Culture. The resulting observations challenge the view that GAC communities did not produce stone adzes of their own, but allegedly restricted themselves only to using ready-made adzes of other Neolithic cultures. The sources under discussion also provide documented information on an innovative contribution of Kuyavian GAC stone workers in the assortment of tool products. This assortment includes polishing plates with the shapes and dimensions that essentially differentiated them from the corresponding tools used in the area in the Neolithic. Nevertheless, the claim that the local GAC communities did not produce type of the stone adze that would be characteristic of their own still remains as valid as ever.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":37678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23858/sa/74.2022.1.3072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sprawozdania Archeologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23858/sa/74.2022.1.3072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究了库雅维亚地区的玻璃瓶文化(GAC)石材生产。该地区的原始材料提供了迄今为止该文化的石工从事复制晚期陶器文化典型形式的广告生产的未知活动的证据。由此产生的观察结果挑战了这样一种观点,即GAC社区并不生产自己的石广告,但据称仅限于使用其他新石器时代文化的现成广告。讨论中的来源还提供了Kuyavian GAC石材工人在工具产品分类方面的创新贡献的文件信息。这种分类包括抛光板,其形状和尺寸从本质上区别于新石器时代该地区使用的相应工具。尽管如此,当地GAC社区并没有生产出符合他们自己特点的石头广告的说法仍然一如既往。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Between the use, copying and innovation. A contribution to the studies on the stone tool industry in Neolithic societies of the Globular Amphora Culture in the Polish Lowland (Kuyavia)
This article focuses on a section of studies on the Globular Amphorae Culture (GAC) stone production in Kuyavia. The source materials from this area provide evidence of heretofore unknown activity of stone workers of this culture engaged in production of adzes that copied the forms typical of Late Band Pottery Culture. The resulting observations challenge the view that GAC communities did not produce stone adzes of their own, but allegedly restricted themselves only to using ready-made adzes of other Neolithic cultures. The sources under discussion also provide documented information on an innovative contribution of Kuyavian GAC stone workers in the assortment of tool products. This assortment includes polishing plates with the shapes and dimensions that essentially differentiated them from the corresponding tools used in the area in the Neolithic. Nevertheless, the claim that the local GAC communities did not produce type of the stone adze that would be characteristic of their own still remains as valid as ever.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Sprawozdania Archeologiczneis a peer-reviewed Polish archaeological journal edited and published annually in English and German by the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, intended especially for Polish and Central-European readership. Its main aim is to present a wide range of approaches to issues in contemporary archaeology and to publish materials and findings of field surveys.
期刊最新文献
Early metallurgy of Ukraine of the Late 5th – 4th Millennia BC: a Synthesis Early Bronze Age Pamukli bair barrow near Malomirovo and the problem of east-oriented barrow graves in Upper Thrace Archaeology of Ukraine during the years of Independence. A brief overview of the long-awaited publication Yampil barrows from the fourth and IIIrd millenium BC in the light of Polish-Ukrainian investigations 2010-2014 Trypillia culture pottery imports with attributes of the latest phase of the Trypillia CII stage in the Funnel Beaker culture settlement Zymne, western Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1