一个有争议的概念的坚持——对欧盟法律十年宪法认同的思考

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW European Public Law Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.54648/euro2021028

L. Besselink

{"title":"一个有争议的概念的坚持——对欧盟法律十年宪法认同的思考","authors":"L. Besselink","doi":"10.54648/euro2021028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution I attempt to explain why so many fundamental controversies surrounding the provision on national identity have not been nearly resolved ten years after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. Also, I indicate why these problems and controversies can be expected to linger on for at least the next ten years.\nConstitutional identity, EU law, constitutional law, EU member states","PeriodicalId":43955,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Persistence of a Contested Concept: Reflections on Ten Years Constitutiona Identity in EU Law\",\"authors\":\"L. Besselink\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/euro2021028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution I attempt to explain why so many fundamental controversies surrounding the provision on national identity have not been nearly resolved ten years after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. Also, I indicate why these problems and controversies can be expected to linger on for at least the next ten years.\\nConstitutional identity, EU law, constitutional law, EU member states\",\"PeriodicalId\":43955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Public Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Public Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2021028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2021028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中，我试图解释为什么在《里斯本条约》生效十年后，围绕国家身份条款的许多根本争议几乎没有得到解决。此外，我还指出了为什么这些问题和争议预计至少会持续十年。宪法身份、欧盟法律、宪法、欧盟成员国

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Persistence of a Contested Concept: Reflections on Ten Years Constitutiona Identity in EU Law

In this contribution I attempt to explain why so many fundamental controversies surrounding the provision on national identity have not been nearly resolved ten years after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. Also, I indicate why these problems and controversies can be expected to linger on for at least the next ten years. Constitutional identity, EU law, constitutional law, EU member states

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Public Law LAW-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

16.70%

发文量