物理共处:解决问题和替代学习的交叉点

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Action Learning Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879
Radhika Venkat, Amit Gupta, Jayanta Banerjee, Ramesh Babu Chellappan
{"title":"物理共处:解决问题和替代学习的交叉点","authors":"Radhika Venkat, Amit Gupta, Jayanta Banerjee, Ramesh Babu Chellappan","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scholars have examined Revans' problem-solving praxeology in many contexts but have not fully explored the concept in the case of physical co-location. Hence, we focussed on investigating Revans' conceptualisation in a co-located context by paying particular attention to the ‘different forms of learning' that emerged from it. The research setting for this study involved two coworking spaces in Bangalore, India, whose constituents were co-located start-ups and established enterprises. Held from January to March 2020, the study involved conducting exploratory, semi-structured interviews with twelve firms. The findings suggested that in a co-located environment, a) firms learnt ‘vicariously' from a rich, external knowledge base during the enquiry-led Alpha phase b) firms learnt ‘experientially', through learning by doing and reflecting in the implementation-focussed Beta phase c) firms learnt through the process of ‘emergence’ that resulted from personal reflection and team interaction, in the revelatory Gamma phase. This study lends a novel direction in acknowledging that vicarious learning, that is, learning through the experience of others, serves as a starting point for problem-solving in a co-located context. We demonstrate that firms gain familiarity with the problem through vicarious sources, that is, from those experienced co-located firms who had journeyed on a similar path.","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Co-location: an intersection of problem-solving and vicarious learning\",\"authors\":\"Radhika Venkat, Amit Gupta, Jayanta Banerjee, Ramesh Babu Chellappan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Scholars have examined Revans' problem-solving praxeology in many contexts but have not fully explored the concept in the case of physical co-location. Hence, we focussed on investigating Revans' conceptualisation in a co-located context by paying particular attention to the ‘different forms of learning' that emerged from it. The research setting for this study involved two coworking spaces in Bangalore, India, whose constituents were co-located start-ups and established enterprises. Held from January to March 2020, the study involved conducting exploratory, semi-structured interviews with twelve firms. The findings suggested that in a co-located environment, a) firms learnt ‘vicariously' from a rich, external knowledge base during the enquiry-led Alpha phase b) firms learnt ‘experientially', through learning by doing and reflecting in the implementation-focussed Beta phase c) firms learnt through the process of ‘emergence’ that resulted from personal reflection and team interaction, in the revelatory Gamma phase. This study lends a novel direction in acknowledging that vicarious learning, that is, learning through the experience of others, serves as a starting point for problem-solving in a co-located context. We demonstrate that firms gain familiarity with the problem through vicarious sources, that is, from those experienced co-located firms who had journeyed on a similar path.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学者们在许多背景下研究了Revans的问题解决行为学,但在物理共处的情况下并没有充分探索这一概念。因此,我们专注于研究Revans在同一地点环境中的概念化,特别关注由此产生的“不同形式的学习”。本研究的研究背景涉及印度班加罗尔的两个共同办公空间,其组成部分是同一地点的初创企业和老牌企业。该研究于2020年1月至3月举行,对12家公司进行了探索性的半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,在共处一地的环境中,a)企业在以询问为导向的阿尔法阶段从丰富的外部知识库中“间接”学习;b)企业通过在实践中学习和在以实施为重点的贝塔阶段中反思而“体验式”学习;c)企业通过个人反思和团队互动产生的“涌现”过程学习,处于启示性伽马阶段。这项研究提供了一个新的方向,承认替代学习,即通过他人的经验进行学习,是在共处的环境中解决问题的起点。我们证明,企业是通过替代来源来熟悉这个问题的,也就是说,从那些经历过类似道路的经验丰富的同地公司那里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical Co-location: an intersection of problem-solving and vicarious learning
ABSTRACT Scholars have examined Revans' problem-solving praxeology in many contexts but have not fully explored the concept in the case of physical co-location. Hence, we focussed on investigating Revans' conceptualisation in a co-located context by paying particular attention to the ‘different forms of learning' that emerged from it. The research setting for this study involved two coworking spaces in Bangalore, India, whose constituents were co-located start-ups and established enterprises. Held from January to March 2020, the study involved conducting exploratory, semi-structured interviews with twelve firms. The findings suggested that in a co-located environment, a) firms learnt ‘vicariously' from a rich, external knowledge base during the enquiry-led Alpha phase b) firms learnt ‘experientially', through learning by doing and reflecting in the implementation-focussed Beta phase c) firms learnt through the process of ‘emergence’ that resulted from personal reflection and team interaction, in the revelatory Gamma phase. This study lends a novel direction in acknowledging that vicarious learning, that is, learning through the experience of others, serves as a starting point for problem-solving in a co-located context. We demonstrate that firms gain familiarity with the problem through vicarious sources, that is, from those experienced co-located firms who had journeyed on a similar path.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action Learning
Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Critical incident technique and action learning to enable organizational learning How to facilitate critical action learning How to promote inclusion, collective intelligence and democracy Action learning aiding innovation In memoriam – Professor John Burgoyne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1