将有限理性应用于信息处理:风险/回报启发式的发展

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Records Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI:10.1108/rmj-09-2021-0035
Salvador P. Barragan
{"title":"将有限理性应用于信息处理:风险/回报启发式的发展","authors":"Salvador P. Barragan","doi":"10.1108/rmj-09-2021-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the implications of applying Herbert Simon’s bounded rationality to records and information management (RIM) and the possibility that a risk/reward heuristic may be part of the disposition decision-making cognitive process. This in turn may improve the understanding of disposition and its suboptimal results and offer alternatives in understanding why certain behaviors exist around keeping information beyond its retention; and to possibly alter this behavior. This in turn may improve the application of information life-cycle policies through the development of new decision-making heuristics for information retention.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper examines disposition of information and how the addition of bounded rationality may improve the understanding of why disposition has not been as successful as it might be.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper concludes that bounded rationality could elevate the RIM function and alter how RIM practitioners within the private sector understand how appraisal and therefore disposition of information occurs. Further, the inclusion of bounded rationality into disposition decision-making may create new roles for practitioners and extend the influence and reach of RIM. Future developments must be watched and analyzed to see if this approach becomes the norm.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper will be of interest to stakeholders responsible for valuing information, appraisal/disposition of information, life-cycle management, records management, information management and big data analytics. The work is original, but parts of this subject were previously addressed in another study.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nParts of this work were part of a PhD study by this author.\n","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying bounded rationality to information disposition: development of a risk/reward heuristic\",\"authors\":\"Salvador P. Barragan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rmj-09-2021-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to examine the implications of applying Herbert Simon’s bounded rationality to records and information management (RIM) and the possibility that a risk/reward heuristic may be part of the disposition decision-making cognitive process. This in turn may improve the understanding of disposition and its suboptimal results and offer alternatives in understanding why certain behaviors exist around keeping information beyond its retention; and to possibly alter this behavior. This in turn may improve the application of information life-cycle policies through the development of new decision-making heuristics for information retention.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper examines disposition of information and how the addition of bounded rationality may improve the understanding of why disposition has not been as successful as it might be.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis paper concludes that bounded rationality could elevate the RIM function and alter how RIM practitioners within the private sector understand how appraisal and therefore disposition of information occurs. Further, the inclusion of bounded rationality into disposition decision-making may create new roles for practitioners and extend the influence and reach of RIM. Future developments must be watched and analyzed to see if this approach becomes the norm.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper will be of interest to stakeholders responsible for valuing information, appraisal/disposition of information, life-cycle management, records management, information management and big data analytics. The work is original, but parts of this subject were previously addressed in another study.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nParts of this work were part of a PhD study by this author.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-09-2021-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-09-2021-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在检验将Herbert Simon的有限理性应用于记录和信息管理(RIM)的含义,以及风险/回报启发式可能是处置决策认知过程的一部分的可能性。这反过来可能会提高对处置及其次优结果的理解,并为理解为什么在保留信息之外存在某些行为提供替代方案;并可能改变这种行为。这反过来可以通过开发新的信息保留决策启发式方法来改进信息生命周期政策的应用。设计/方法论/方法本文研究了信息的处置,以及有限理性的加入如何提高对处置为何没有像可能的那样成功的理解发生信息的处置。此外,将有限理性纳入处置决策可能会为从业者创造新的角色,并扩大RIM的影响力和影响范围。必须观察和分析未来的发展,看看这种方法是否成为常态。实际含义本文将引起负责信息评估、信息评估/处置、生命周期管理、记录管理、信息管理和大数据分析的利益相关者的兴趣。这项工作是原创的,但之前在另一项研究中讨论过这一主题的部分内容。原创性/价值这项工作的一部分是作者博士研究的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying bounded rationality to information disposition: development of a risk/reward heuristic
Purpose This paper aims to examine the implications of applying Herbert Simon’s bounded rationality to records and information management (RIM) and the possibility that a risk/reward heuristic may be part of the disposition decision-making cognitive process. This in turn may improve the understanding of disposition and its suboptimal results and offer alternatives in understanding why certain behaviors exist around keeping information beyond its retention; and to possibly alter this behavior. This in turn may improve the application of information life-cycle policies through the development of new decision-making heuristics for information retention. Design/methodology/approach This paper examines disposition of information and how the addition of bounded rationality may improve the understanding of why disposition has not been as successful as it might be. Findings This paper concludes that bounded rationality could elevate the RIM function and alter how RIM practitioners within the private sector understand how appraisal and therefore disposition of information occurs. Further, the inclusion of bounded rationality into disposition decision-making may create new roles for practitioners and extend the influence and reach of RIM. Future developments must be watched and analyzed to see if this approach becomes the norm. Practical implications This paper will be of interest to stakeholders responsible for valuing information, appraisal/disposition of information, life-cycle management, records management, information management and big data analytics. The work is original, but parts of this subject were previously addressed in another study. Originality/value Parts of this work were part of a PhD study by this author.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Records management compliance: a case study of Kuwait’s College of Basic Education Strategy for auditing investigation records and information: a case study of records and information management in the Royal Malaysian Police Electronic records management amidst the seismic shift in the dynamic infosphere Insights into the current state of electronic health records adoption and utilisation in Tanzanian public primary healthcare facilities: a survey study Conceptual framework to explore artificial intelligence technology (AIT) readiness and adoption intention in records and information management (RIM) practices: a proposal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1