教师性别认同与教学大纲设计是否影响学生对教师的认知?

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1177/00986283211072742
Bethany Fleck, A. Richmond
{"title":"教师性别认同与教学大纲设计是否影响学生对教师的认知?","authors":"Bethany Fleck, A. Richmond","doi":"10.1177/00986283211072742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learner-centered syllabi influence students’ perceptions of their instructors; however, studies have not investigated the gender identity of the instructor. We sought to investigate whether the gender of the instructor and the syllabus design affected students' perceptions of the instructor, course, and memory of the syllabus. Participants were randomly assigned to read either learner- or instructor-centered syllabi for a course taught by a male, female, or gender-neutral instructor. They reported their perceptions of the instructor (i.e., Teacher Behavior Checklist), how they perceived the syllabus (i.e., Syllabus Tone Survey), and their memory of syllabus information. Students who received a learner-centered syllabus perceived the instructor as possessing higher master teacher behaviors, positive tone and remembered more of the course syllabus. Students perceived gender-neutral instructors as more caring, supportive, professional, and communicative compared to male and female instructors. Perceptions of male instructors were the least negative, and female instructors were the least positive. The current study adds to the growing body of research demonstrating that a learner-centered syllabus can positively influence students' perceptions of the instructor. The initial evidence suggests that gender may also have an effect. Instructors should consider designing their syllabus using learner-centered principles and be cautious and aware of a potential gender bias.","PeriodicalId":47708,"journal":{"name":"Teaching of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Instructors Gender Identity and Syllabus Design Affect Students Perceptions of Their Instructor?\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Fleck, A. Richmond\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00986283211072742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learner-centered syllabi influence students’ perceptions of their instructors; however, studies have not investigated the gender identity of the instructor. We sought to investigate whether the gender of the instructor and the syllabus design affected students' perceptions of the instructor, course, and memory of the syllabus. Participants were randomly assigned to read either learner- or instructor-centered syllabi for a course taught by a male, female, or gender-neutral instructor. They reported their perceptions of the instructor (i.e., Teacher Behavior Checklist), how they perceived the syllabus (i.e., Syllabus Tone Survey), and their memory of syllabus information. Students who received a learner-centered syllabus perceived the instructor as possessing higher master teacher behaviors, positive tone and remembered more of the course syllabus. Students perceived gender-neutral instructors as more caring, supportive, professional, and communicative compared to male and female instructors. Perceptions of male instructors were the least negative, and female instructors were the least positive. The current study adds to the growing body of research demonstrating that a learner-centered syllabus can positively influence students' perceptions of the instructor. The initial evidence suggests that gender may also have an effect. Instructors should consider designing their syllabus using learner-centered principles and be cautious and aware of a potential gender bias.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211072742\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211072742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以学习者为中心的教学大纲会影响学生对导师的看法;然而,研究并没有调查辅导员的性别认同。我们试图调查教师的性别和教学大纲设计是否影响学生对教师、课程和教学大纲记忆的看法。参与者被随机分配阅读由男性、女性或性别中立讲师教授的课程的以学习者或讲师为中心的教学大纲。他们报告了他们对教师的看法(即教师行为清单),他们如何看待教学大纲(即教学大纲语气调查),以及他们对教学大纲信息的记忆。接受以学习者为中心的教学大纲的学生认为教师具有更高的主教师行为、积极的语气和更多的课程大纲记忆。与男教师和女教师相比,学生们认为性别中立的教师更关心他人、更支持他人、更专业、更善于沟通。对男教员的看法最不消极,而对女教员的看法则最不积极。目前的研究进一步证明,以学习者为中心的教学大纲可以积极影响学生对教师的看法。初步证据表明,性别也可能产生影响。教师应考虑使用以学习者为中心的原则设计教学大纲,并注意潜在的性别偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the Instructors Gender Identity and Syllabus Design Affect Students Perceptions of Their Instructor?
Learner-centered syllabi influence students’ perceptions of their instructors; however, studies have not investigated the gender identity of the instructor. We sought to investigate whether the gender of the instructor and the syllabus design affected students' perceptions of the instructor, course, and memory of the syllabus. Participants were randomly assigned to read either learner- or instructor-centered syllabi for a course taught by a male, female, or gender-neutral instructor. They reported their perceptions of the instructor (i.e., Teacher Behavior Checklist), how they perceived the syllabus (i.e., Syllabus Tone Survey), and their memory of syllabus information. Students who received a learner-centered syllabus perceived the instructor as possessing higher master teacher behaviors, positive tone and remembered more of the course syllabus. Students perceived gender-neutral instructors as more caring, supportive, professional, and communicative compared to male and female instructors. Perceptions of male instructors were the least negative, and female instructors were the least positive. The current study adds to the growing body of research demonstrating that a learner-centered syllabus can positively influence students' perceptions of the instructor. The initial evidence suggests that gender may also have an effect. Instructors should consider designing their syllabus using learner-centered principles and be cautious and aware of a potential gender bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Basic and introductory psychology courses are the most popular electives on college campuses and a rapidly growing addition to high school curriculums. As such, Teaching of Psychology is indispensable as a source book for teaching methods and as a forum for new ideas. Dedicated to improving the learning and teaching process at all educational levels, this journal has established itself as a leading source of information and inspiration for all who teach psychology. Coverage includes empirical research on teaching and learning; studies of teacher or student characteristics; subject matter or content reviews for class use; investigations of student, course, or teacher assessment; professional problems of teachers; essays on teaching.
期刊最新文献
Does Lecture Style Matter in Asynchronous Online Interteaching? Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing The Use of AI Disclosure Statements in Teaching: Developing Skills for Psychologists of the Future Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom Recommendations for Implementing Anti-Ableism Across the Psychology Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1