D. Zanini, C. Reppold, Monalisa Muni, A. Noronha, F. J. M. Rueda
{"title":"为什么要规范心理测试的使用和获取？","authors":"D. Zanini, C. Reppold, Monalisa Muni, A. Noronha, F. J. M. Rueda","doi":"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.22437.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why regulate the use of and access to Psychological Tests? The regulation of psychological assessments, and more specifically of psychological tests, has been a matter of concern and debate in the national context for several decades. The aim of this article was to consider and discuss the possible lack of regulation regarding the use and commercialization of psychological tests and the consequences for individuals, society and the results of the psychological assessment. For this, the article provides a brief history of psychological assessment in Brazil, passing through the construction and structuring of the psychological test assessment system (Satepsi), the judgment of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 3481 by the Supreme Court, and considering the need, reasonableness and adequacy of regulation of the use of and access to psychological tests. The authors conclude that the restriction of access to psychological tests is not potentially harmful for individuals, society or psychological instrument, however, open access or indiscriminate commercialization could be.","PeriodicalId":37995,"journal":{"name":"Avaliacao Psicologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Por Que Regulamentar o Uso e Acesso aos Testes Psicológicos?\",\"authors\":\"D. Zanini, C. Reppold, Monalisa Muni, A. Noronha, F. J. M. Rueda\",\"doi\":\"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.22437.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why regulate the use of and access to Psychological Tests? The regulation of psychological assessments, and more specifically of psychological tests, has been a matter of concern and debate in the national context for several decades. The aim of this article was to consider and discuss the possible lack of regulation regarding the use and commercialization of psychological tests and the consequences for individuals, society and the results of the psychological assessment. For this, the article provides a brief history of psychological assessment in Brazil, passing through the construction and structuring of the psychological test assessment system (Satepsi), the judgment of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 3481 by the Supreme Court, and considering the need, reasonableness and adequacy of regulation of the use of and access to psychological tests. The authors conclude that the restriction of access to psychological tests is not potentially harmful for individuals, society or psychological instrument, however, open access or indiscriminate commercialization could be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.22437.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliacao Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.22437.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Por Que Regulamentar o Uso e Acesso aos Testes Psicológicos?
Why regulate the use of and access to Psychological Tests? The regulation of psychological assessments, and more specifically of psychological tests, has been a matter of concern and debate in the national context for several decades. The aim of this article was to consider and discuss the possible lack of regulation regarding the use and commercialization of psychological tests and the consequences for individuals, society and the results of the psychological assessment. For this, the article provides a brief history of psychological assessment in Brazil, passing through the construction and structuring of the psychological test assessment system (Satepsi), the judgment of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 3481 by the Supreme Court, and considering the need, reasonableness and adequacy of regulation of the use of and access to psychological tests. The authors conclude that the restriction of access to psychological tests is not potentially harmful for individuals, society or psychological instrument, however, open access or indiscriminate commercialization could be.
期刊介绍：
Journal Avaliação Psicológica - Official Publication of the Brazilian Institute of Psychological Assessment (IBAP). This journal is a quarterly publication, it is also a vehicle for the dissemination of scientific Ibero-American area of psychological and educational assessment. Its objective is to divulge the advances of the theory, searches and practical in the area of the evaluation in Psychology, Education, Counseling, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources and others related disciplines. The publishing process aims to present to the scientific community a text that reflects a significant and actualize contribution. Publishes original papers, preferably research reports, but also the literature review articles, technical notes and short reports of research, book reviews and news on the topic.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
