智利惩罚性行政法中刑事保障正当性的另一种解释

P. Salgado
{"title":"智利惩罚性行政法中刑事保障正当性的另一种解释","authors":"P. Salgado","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a brief description of the state of affairs on the issue of implementation of fundamental rights of the citizens in administrative penalty procedures, based on some statements of the Chilean courts of justice. Here it is propose uprightly to abandon the search for a «supposed natural or ontological identity» between administrative offense and criminal offense. Under these assumptions, we conclude that a rational understanding of the tools that the administration has, to determine their duties, can finally help as a clarification of the historical relationship between administrative \npenalty and punishment.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"96-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Una interpretación alternativa a la justificación de garantías penales en el derecho administrativo sancionador para Chile\",\"authors\":\"P. Salgado\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a brief description of the state of affairs on the issue of implementation of fundamental rights of the citizens in administrative penalty procedures, based on some statements of the Chilean courts of justice. Here it is propose uprightly to abandon the search for a «supposed natural or ontological identity» between administrative offense and criminal offense. Under these assumptions, we conclude that a rational understanding of the tools that the administration has, to determine their duties, can finally help as a clarification of the historical relationship between administrative \\npenalty and punishment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"96-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文根据智利法院的一些陈述,简要介绍了在行政处罚程序中落实公民基本权利问题的现状。在这里,我们直截了当地建议放弃在行政犯罪和刑事犯罪之间寻找“假定的自然或本体身份”。在这些假设下,我们得出结论,合理理解行政部门确定其职责的工具,最终有助于澄清行政处罚和处罚之间的历史关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Una interpretación alternativa a la justificación de garantías penales en el derecho administrativo sancionador para Chile
This paper provides a brief description of the state of affairs on the issue of implementation of fundamental rights of the citizens in administrative penalty procedures, based on some statements of the Chilean courts of justice. Here it is propose uprightly to abandon the search for a «supposed natural or ontological identity» between administrative offense and criminal offense. Under these assumptions, we conclude that a rational understanding of the tools that the administration has, to determine their duties, can finally help as a clarification of the historical relationship between administrative penalty and punishment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La sustracción de cosas corporales informes. El caso del agua, la electricidad y el gas Aproximaciones teóricas para una explicación de la violencia carcelaria interpersonal: un debate pendiente en el sistema penitenciario chileno Consideraciones acerca del tratamiento del error de prohibición en la jurisprudencia chilena ¿Es necesario un acuerdo en la coautoría? Una revisión crítica de acuerdo con la teoría de la acción El bien jurídico protegido como límite -aún posible- entre el derecho penal y el derecho administrativo sancionador: Reflexiones desde el derecho penal económico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1