几项法案和一项法律作为复兴欧洲(框架)法律的动力

Q4 Social Sciences Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.5817/cpvp2022-4-7
Filip Křepelka
{"title":"几项法案和一项法律作为复兴欧洲(框架)法律的动力","authors":"Filip Křepelka","doi":"10.5817/cpvp2022-4-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The short titles of several recent EU regulations or proposals contain the words ‘act’ and ‘law’. The latter reminds EU legal scholars, especially those using different EU languages, that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe envisaged turning regulations into European laws, and directives into European framework laws. We propose to discuss their revival in terms of the so-called legislative acts, i.e., a category retained by the Lisbon Treaty, which otherwise avoids such a statist terminology, deeming it too sensitive. They are passed by the European Parliament, which is a directly elected body. A comparative look shows the difference in parliamentary statutes and instruments adopted by the executives of many nations in their languages with different nouns. This terminology also accommodates the recent preference for regulations, including dozens of them being transformed from directives. The two terms distinguished by a modifier reflect their relationship to each other.","PeriodicalId":52263,"journal":{"name":"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Several Acts and One Law as an Impulse for Reviving European (Framework) Laws\",\"authors\":\"Filip Křepelka\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/cpvp2022-4-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The short titles of several recent EU regulations or proposals contain the words ‘act’ and ‘law’. The latter reminds EU legal scholars, especially those using different EU languages, that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe envisaged turning regulations into European laws, and directives into European framework laws. We propose to discuss their revival in terms of the so-called legislative acts, i.e., a category retained by the Lisbon Treaty, which otherwise avoids such a statist terminology, deeming it too sensitive. They are passed by the European Parliament, which is a directly elected body. A comparative look shows the difference in parliamentary statutes and instruments adopted by the executives of many nations in their languages with different nouns. This terminology also accommodates the recent preference for regulations, including dozens of them being transformed from directives. The two terms distinguished by a modifier reflect their relationship to each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/cpvp2022-4-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cpvp2022-4-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近几项欧盟法规或提案的简短标题中包含“法案”和“法律”。后者提醒欧盟法律学者,特别是那些使用不同欧盟语言的学者,建立欧洲宪法的条约设想将法规转化为欧洲法律,将指令转化为欧洲框架法律。我们建议从所谓的立法法案的角度来讨论它们的复兴,即《里斯本条约》保留的一个类别,该条约在其他方面避免了这种国家主义术语,认为它过于敏感。它们由欧洲议会通过,欧洲议会是一个直接选举产生的机构。通过比较可以看出,许多国家的行政人员在使用不同名词的语言时所采用的议会法规和文书存在差异。这一术语也适应了最近对法规的偏好,包括数十项由指令转变而来的法规。用修饰语区分的两个术语反映了它们之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Several Acts and One Law as an Impulse for Reviving European (Framework) Laws
The short titles of several recent EU regulations or proposals contain the words ‘act’ and ‘law’. The latter reminds EU legal scholars, especially those using different EU languages, that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe envisaged turning regulations into European laws, and directives into European framework laws. We propose to discuss their revival in terms of the so-called legislative acts, i.e., a category retained by the Lisbon Treaty, which otherwise avoids such a statist terminology, deeming it too sensitive. They are passed by the European Parliament, which is a directly elected body. A comparative look shows the difference in parliamentary statutes and instruments adopted by the executives of many nations in their languages with different nouns. This terminology also accommodates the recent preference for regulations, including dozens of them being transformed from directives. The two terms distinguished by a modifier reflect their relationship to each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi
Casopis pro Pravni Vedu a Praxi Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Výsledky dokazování přesahující skutková tvrzení stran a možnosti jejich použití v civilním sporném řízení Tři účinky francouzské koncepce výhrady veřejného pořádku (effet atténué, effet réflexe, ordre public de proximité) – relevance pro českou právní doktrínu a praxi? Efektivní porušení práva Specifika účasti veřejnosti v postupech podle zákona o nakládání s těžebním odpadem Problematika regulácie vzdialeného vodiča z pohľadu teórie a praxe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1