持续经营的不确定性:公司披露什么?

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Australian Accounting Review Pub Date : 2022-07-09 DOI:10.1111/auar.12379
Michael Bradbury, Neil Fargher, Brad Potter, Stephen Taylor
{"title":"持续经营的不确定性:公司披露什么?","authors":"Michael Bradbury,&nbsp;Neil Fargher,&nbsp;Brad Potter,&nbsp;Stephen Taylor","doi":"10.1111/auar.12379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine disclosure of going concern uncertainties by Australian companies. We begin by outlining the extant reporting framework applicable from accounting and auditing standards, and compare the approach to this issue taken across several different countries – Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. We then examine reporting of going concern uncertainties for a selection of 127 Australian companies reporting at 30 June 2020 that also receive modified audit reports highlighting going concern issues. Our results indicate substantial variation in the specific requirements of audit and accounting standards impacting going concern disclosure across jurisdictions, with relevant disclosure guidance for Australian entities primarily contained in auditing, rather than accounting, standards. Not surprisingly then, we also observe significant variation in management reporting practices. These results inform our understanding of existing disclosure requirements and highlight how regulatory reliance on auditor discussion of going concern issues likely results in relatively limited management disclosure. We suggest that additional guidance may be required from accounting standard setters and also regulators with respect to management discussion of going concern uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"32 3","pages":"294-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12379","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going Concern Uncertainty: What Do Firms Disclose?\",\"authors\":\"Michael Bradbury,&nbsp;Neil Fargher,&nbsp;Brad Potter,&nbsp;Stephen Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/auar.12379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examine disclosure of going concern uncertainties by Australian companies. We begin by outlining the extant reporting framework applicable from accounting and auditing standards, and compare the approach to this issue taken across several different countries – Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. We then examine reporting of going concern uncertainties for a selection of 127 Australian companies reporting at 30 June 2020 that also receive modified audit reports highlighting going concern issues. Our results indicate substantial variation in the specific requirements of audit and accounting standards impacting going concern disclosure across jurisdictions, with relevant disclosure guidance for Australian entities primarily contained in auditing, rather than accounting, standards. Not surprisingly then, we also observe significant variation in management reporting practices. These results inform our understanding of existing disclosure requirements and highlight how regulatory reliance on auditor discussion of going concern issues likely results in relatively limited management disclosure. We suggest that additional guidance may be required from accounting standard setters and also regulators with respect to management discussion of going concern uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"294-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12379\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们考察了澳大利亚公司对持续经营不确定性的披露。我们首先概述了适用于会计和审计标准的现有报告框架,并比较了几个不同国家(澳大利亚、新西兰、英国和美国)在这一问题上采取的方法。然后,我们研究了截至2020年6月30日报告的127家澳大利亚公司的持续经营不确定性报告,这些公司也收到了强调持续经营问题的修订审计报告。我们的研究结果表明,影响各司法管辖区持续经营披露的审计和会计准则的具体要求存在重大差异,澳大利亚实体的相关披露指导主要包含在审计标准中,而不是会计标准中。毫不奇怪,我们还观察到管理报告实践中的显著差异。这些结果让我们了解了现有的披露要求,并强调了监管部门对审计师对持续经营问题的讨论的依赖可能会导致管理层披露相对有限。我们建议,可能需要会计准则制定者和监管机构就管理层对持续经营不确定性的讨论提供额外的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Going Concern Uncertainty: What Do Firms Disclose?

We examine disclosure of going concern uncertainties by Australian companies. We begin by outlining the extant reporting framework applicable from accounting and auditing standards, and compare the approach to this issue taken across several different countries – Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. We then examine reporting of going concern uncertainties for a selection of 127 Australian companies reporting at 30 June 2020 that also receive modified audit reports highlighting going concern issues. Our results indicate substantial variation in the specific requirements of audit and accounting standards impacting going concern disclosure across jurisdictions, with relevant disclosure guidance for Australian entities primarily contained in auditing, rather than accounting, standards. Not surprisingly then, we also observe significant variation in management reporting practices. These results inform our understanding of existing disclosure requirements and highlight how regulatory reliance on auditor discussion of going concern issues likely results in relatively limited management disclosure. We suggest that additional guidance may be required from accounting standard setters and also regulators with respect to management discussion of going concern uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Boundaries of Accounting The Shifting and Permeable Boundaries of Auditing: Evidence from Early Australian Examination Papers CEO Benevolence and Corporate Social Performance Integrated Reporting Impact on Core Organisational Practices: A Practice-Based Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1