标准。复杂性的构建模块

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Metode Science Studies Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI:10.7203/METODE.11.19795
J. Peretó, M. Porcar
{"title":"标准。复杂性的构建模块","authors":"J. Peretó, M. Porcar","doi":"10.7203/METODE.11.19795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Without standards, the world as we know it would not be possible. International and supra-cultural standards and norms have been a key factor in engineering, as well as in the development of industrial societies. Despite the obvious successes in electronic and mechanical design, other technological areas present difficulties for the application of standards. In the field of biotechnology and synthetic biology – which aims at studying living things from an engineering perspective – standards are desirable, but whether they can be widely adopted remains to be proved. This monograph reviews the sociological and scientific aspects of standardisation and delves into the more problematic facets of universal standardisation, especially in the biological field. Are standards possible in synthetic biology at all? What are the limitations to the universal use of modular and interchangeable parts in a cellular context? Could it be that the biological world resists standardisation, similarly to the field of software engineering, where these attempts have not progressed? And should some kind of standard be applicable in synthetic biology, what qualities might be required in an environment of open science and responsible research and innovation?","PeriodicalId":41648,"journal":{"name":"Metode Science Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"64-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards. The building blocks of complexity\",\"authors\":\"J. Peretó, M. Porcar\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/METODE.11.19795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Without standards, the world as we know it would not be possible. International and supra-cultural standards and norms have been a key factor in engineering, as well as in the development of industrial societies. Despite the obvious successes in electronic and mechanical design, other technological areas present difficulties for the application of standards. In the field of biotechnology and synthetic biology – which aims at studying living things from an engineering perspective – standards are desirable, but whether they can be widely adopted remains to be proved. This monograph reviews the sociological and scientific aspects of standardisation and delves into the more problematic facets of universal standardisation, especially in the biological field. Are standards possible in synthetic biology at all? What are the limitations to the universal use of modular and interchangeable parts in a cellular context? Could it be that the biological world resists standardisation, similarly to the field of software engineering, where these attempts have not progressed? And should some kind of standard be applicable in synthetic biology, what qualities might be required in an environment of open science and responsible research and innovation?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"64-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/METODE.11.19795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metode Science Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/METODE.11.19795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有标准,我们所知道的世界就不可能实现。国际和超文化标准和规范一直是工程以及工业社会发展的关键因素。尽管在电子和机械设计方面取得了明显的成功,但其他技术领域的标准应用也存在困难。在生物技术和合成生物学领域—— 旨在从工程学的角度研究生物 – 标准是可取的,但它们能否被广泛采用还有待证明。这本专著回顾了标准化的社会学和科学方面,并深入探讨了普遍标准化的更具问题性的方面,尤其是在生物学领域。合成生物学的标准可能吗?在细胞环境中普遍使用模块化和可互换部件的限制是什么?生物世界是否会抵制标准化,就像软件工程领域一样,这些尝试没有取得进展?如果某种标准适用于合成生物学,那么在开放科学和负责任的研究与创新的环境中,可能需要什么样的素质?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards. The building blocks of complexity
Without standards, the world as we know it would not be possible. International and supra-cultural standards and norms have been a key factor in engineering, as well as in the development of industrial societies. Despite the obvious successes in electronic and mechanical design, other technological areas present difficulties for the application of standards. In the field of biotechnology and synthetic biology – which aims at studying living things from an engineering perspective – standards are desirable, but whether they can be widely adopted remains to be proved. This monograph reviews the sociological and scientific aspects of standardisation and delves into the more problematic facets of universal standardisation, especially in the biological field. Are standards possible in synthetic biology at all? What are the limitations to the universal use of modular and interchangeable parts in a cellular context? Could it be that the biological world resists standardisation, similarly to the field of software engineering, where these attempts have not progressed? And should some kind of standard be applicable in synthetic biology, what qualities might be required in an environment of open science and responsible research and innovation?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metode Science Studies Journal
Metode Science Studies Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
MORE BIODIVERSITY TO IMPROVE OUR HEALTH The benefits to human well-being of favouring functional and diverse ecosystems Citizen consultations on science communication: A citizen science approach The plants of the future. Genome editing in biotechnology Standards. The building blocks of complexity Good to eat. Food and health at a time of information overload
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1