来源和信息相关性对健康播客受众反应的影响

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Reports Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129
C. E. Kirkpatrick, Sungkyoung Lee
{"title":"来源和信息相关性对健康播客受众反应的影响","authors":"C. E. Kirkpatrick, Sungkyoung Lee","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the impact of source type (expert, experienced, and layperson) and message relevance (high versus low relevance) on message processing and persuasion in the context of health podcasts as a health promotion tool. Findings from a 3 (source) x 2 (message relevance) within-subjects factorial design experiment (N = 113) showed perceived source competence, perceived source trustworthiness, perceived message effectiveness, health behavior intentions, and podcast download intentions were greatest for podcasts delivered by an expert source, followed by an experienced source and a layperson source. Podcasts with higher message relevance resulted in greater health behavior intentions and podcast download intentions.","PeriodicalId":45913,"journal":{"name":"Communication Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Source and Message Relevance on Audience Responses to Health Podcasts\",\"authors\":\"C. E. Kirkpatrick, Sungkyoung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the impact of source type (expert, experienced, and layperson) and message relevance (high versus low relevance) on message processing and persuasion in the context of health podcasts as a health promotion tool. Findings from a 3 (source) x 2 (message relevance) within-subjects factorial design experiment (N = 113) showed perceived source competence, perceived source trustworthiness, perceived message effectiveness, health behavior intentions, and podcast download intentions were greatest for podcasts delivered by an expert source, followed by an experienced source and a layperson source. Podcasts with higher message relevance resulted in greater health behavior intentions and podcast download intentions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2021.1912129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究探讨了在健康播客作为健康促进工具的背景下,来源类型(专家、经验丰富的人和外行)和信息相关性(高相关性与低相关性)对信息处理和说服的影响。受试者因子设计实验(N=113)中的3(来源)x 2(信息相关性)结果显示,对于由专家来源提供的播客,感知来源能力、感知来源可信度、感知信息有效性、健康行为意向和播客下载意向最大,其次是有经验的来源和非专业人士来源。具有更高信息相关性的播客导致更大的健康行为意图和播客下载意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Source and Message Relevance on Audience Responses to Health Podcasts
This study explores the impact of source type (expert, experienced, and layperson) and message relevance (high versus low relevance) on message processing and persuasion in the context of health podcasts as a health promotion tool. Findings from a 3 (source) x 2 (message relevance) within-subjects factorial design experiment (N = 113) showed perceived source competence, perceived source trustworthiness, perceived message effectiveness, health behavior intentions, and podcast download intentions were greatest for podcasts delivered by an expert source, followed by an experienced source and a layperson source. Podcasts with higher message relevance resulted in greater health behavior intentions and podcast download intentions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Reports
Communication Reports COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Communication Reports (CR), published biannually since 1988, is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal publishes original manuscripts that are short, data/text-based, and related to the broadly defined field of human communication. The mission of the journal is to showcase exemplary scholarship without censorship based on topics, methods, or analytical tools. Articles that are purely speculative or theoretical, and not data analytic, are not appropriate for this journal. Authors are expected to devote a substantial portion of the manuscript to analyzing and reporting research data.
期刊最新文献
Information Work with Friends Experiencing an Intimate Health Concern We’re Going Streaking!: Associations Between the Gamification of Mediated Communication and Relational Closeness Promoting the Use of Electric Vehicles on Social Media: The Effects of Message Framing, Point of Reference, and Political Affiliation on Perceived Information Value for Others and Purchase Intentions Disclosing Bipolar Disorder in Romantic Relationships Testing the Mercator Effect: Global Map Projections Persuade Differently According to the Emphasis Frames Used to Contextualize Them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1