20世纪80年代以来芬兰高中双重学历教育的定位和政府政策

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Educational Research Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1177/14749041211065328
Outi Lietzén
{"title":"20世纪80年代以来芬兰高中双重学历教育的定位和政府政策","authors":"Outi Lietzén","doi":"10.1177/14749041211065328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the positioning of dual qualifications (DQs) in the Finnish education policy and the education system since the late 1980s. The analysis is carried out in the context of academic-vocational divide. At the end of the 1980s, Finland questioned the functionality of the strict academic-vocational divide in post-compulsory education, and a unified upper secondary education was initiated. DQ was the result of two contradictory political discourses: the aim to make education system more equal and the 1990s’ market oriented education policy. In the 2000s, although segregation at the upper secondary level was strengthened, the DQ simultaneously became an established study route. However, in 2007 due to changes in political power, the DQ was repositioned on the periphery of education policy and academic-vocational divide became stronger. The main focus as regards the functions of DQs until the end of the 2010s was on efforts to enhance the use of educational resources and improve the possibilities for individual and flexible education choices. The aim of the current government, elected in 2019, is to strengthen cooperation at upper secondary level, which is also expected to include DQs. However, the actualisation might be mitigated by the educational reforms of the previous government.","PeriodicalId":47336,"journal":{"name":"European Educational Research Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"368 - 393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The positioning of dual qualification studies in Finnish upper secondary education and government policy since the 1980s\",\"authors\":\"Outi Lietzén\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14749041211065328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the positioning of dual qualifications (DQs) in the Finnish education policy and the education system since the late 1980s. The analysis is carried out in the context of academic-vocational divide. At the end of the 1980s, Finland questioned the functionality of the strict academic-vocational divide in post-compulsory education, and a unified upper secondary education was initiated. DQ was the result of two contradictory political discourses: the aim to make education system more equal and the 1990s’ market oriented education policy. In the 2000s, although segregation at the upper secondary level was strengthened, the DQ simultaneously became an established study route. However, in 2007 due to changes in political power, the DQ was repositioned on the periphery of education policy and academic-vocational divide became stronger. The main focus as regards the functions of DQs until the end of the 2010s was on efforts to enhance the use of educational resources and improve the possibilities for individual and flexible education choices. The aim of the current government, elected in 2019, is to strengthen cooperation at upper secondary level, which is also expected to include DQs. However, the actualisation might be mitigated by the educational reforms of the previous government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Educational Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"368 - 393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Educational Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211065328\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211065328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了自20世纪80年代末以来,双重学历在芬兰教育政策和教育体系中的定位。这一分析是在学术职业分化的背景下进行的。20世纪80年代末,芬兰对后义务教育中严格的学术-职业划分的功能提出质疑,并启动了统一的高中教育。DQ是两种相互矛盾的政治话语的结果:一种是旨在使教育系统更加平等,另一种是20世纪90年代以市场为导向的教育政策。在2000年代,尽管高中阶段的隔离得到了加强,但DQ同时成为了一条既定的学习路线。然而,在2007年,由于政治权力的变化,DQ被重新定位在教育政策的边缘,学术和职业分歧变得更加强烈。直到2010年代末,DQ的职能主要集中在努力加强教育资源的使用,并提高个人和灵活教育选择的可能性。2019年当选的本届政府的目标是加强高中阶段的合作,预计高中阶段也将包括DQ。然而,上届政府的教育改革可能会缓解这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The positioning of dual qualification studies in Finnish upper secondary education and government policy since the 1980s
This article explores the positioning of dual qualifications (DQs) in the Finnish education policy and the education system since the late 1980s. The analysis is carried out in the context of academic-vocational divide. At the end of the 1980s, Finland questioned the functionality of the strict academic-vocational divide in post-compulsory education, and a unified upper secondary education was initiated. DQ was the result of two contradictory political discourses: the aim to make education system more equal and the 1990s’ market oriented education policy. In the 2000s, although segregation at the upper secondary level was strengthened, the DQ simultaneously became an established study route. However, in 2007 due to changes in political power, the DQ was repositioned on the periphery of education policy and academic-vocational divide became stronger. The main focus as regards the functions of DQs until the end of the 2010s was on efforts to enhance the use of educational resources and improve the possibilities for individual and flexible education choices. The aim of the current government, elected in 2019, is to strengthen cooperation at upper secondary level, which is also expected to include DQs. However, the actualisation might be mitigated by the educational reforms of the previous government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Educational Research Journal
European Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The European Educational Research Journal (EERJ) is a scientific journal interested in the changing landscape of education research across Europe. Education research increasingly crosses the borders of the national through its subjects of study, scholarly collaborations and references. The EERJ publishes education research papers and special issues which include a reflection on how the European context and other related global or regional dynamics shape their educational research topics. The European Educational Research Journal publishes double-blind peer-reviewed papers in special issues and as individual articles. The EERJ reviews submitted papers on the basis of the quality of their argument, the contemporary nature of their work, and the level of ''speaking'' to the European audience. Policy-makers, administrators and practitioners with an interest in European issues are now invited to subscribe. The EERJ publishes peer reviewed articles, essay reviews and research reports (forms of research intelligence across Europe)
期刊最新文献
Teacher Change in an Era of Neo-Liberal Policies: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of Teachers' Perceptions of Their Professional Change Situated Learning in Young Romanian Roma Successful Learning Biographies ‘Engaging People and Ideas’: Memories, Meaning Making and the European Educational Research Association Gender equity in academic knowledge production: the influence of politics, power and precarity Pragmatic sociology and the economics of convention: Introducing a ‘novel’ approach to English-speaking education research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1