内窥镜与显微技术在鼓膜穿孔修复中的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY ENT Updates Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI:10.32448/ENTUPDATES.576183
İ. Güler, Müge Özcan
{"title":"内窥镜与显微技术在鼓膜穿孔修复中的比较","authors":"İ. Güler, Müge Özcan","doi":"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.576183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty in terms of graft success rate and hearing gain. Methods: Medical records of 236 patients (99 females and 137 males) aged 18 to 74 years with chronic otitis media who underwent myringoplasty, between January 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively compared. Patients were divided into two groups; microscopic myringoplasty (140 patients), endoscopic myringoplasty (96 patients). Demographic data, pure tone audiometric results preoperatively and 6 months postopera­tively, operation time, hearing gain and graft success rate were evaluated. Results: The mean operation time was 57.8±9.6 minutes for the endoscopic group and 78.6±17.7 minutes for the microscopic group (p<0.001). The mean preoperative air bone gap (ABG) was 24.1±11.5 dB for the microscopic group and 22.7±9.2 dB for the endoscopic group, whereas the mean postoperative ABG was 11.6±9.9 and 9.8±9.3 dB respectively. Graft success rate was 90.3% (213 patients) for entire group, 89.7% (131 patients) for the microscopic group, and 91.1% (82 patients) for the endoscopic group (p=0.727). The functional success rate (ABG ≤ 10 dB) was 72.5% (171 patients) in the entire group. The mean hearing gain was 12.4±10.8 and 12.8±9 dB in the microscopic and endoscopic groups respectively. Conclusion: Endoscopic technique offers similar graft success and hearing outcomes to microscopic technique along with a shorter operation time.","PeriodicalId":41744,"journal":{"name":"ENT Updates","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations\",\"authors\":\"İ. Güler, Müge Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.32448/ENTUPDATES.576183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty in terms of graft success rate and hearing gain. Methods: Medical records of 236 patients (99 females and 137 males) aged 18 to 74 years with chronic otitis media who underwent myringoplasty, between January 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively compared. Patients were divided into two groups; microscopic myringoplasty (140 patients), endoscopic myringoplasty (96 patients). Demographic data, pure tone audiometric results preoperatively and 6 months postopera­tively, operation time, hearing gain and graft success rate were evaluated. Results: The mean operation time was 57.8±9.6 minutes for the endoscopic group and 78.6±17.7 minutes for the microscopic group (p<0.001). The mean preoperative air bone gap (ABG) was 24.1±11.5 dB for the microscopic group and 22.7±9.2 dB for the endoscopic group, whereas the mean postoperative ABG was 11.6±9.9 and 9.8±9.3 dB respectively. Graft success rate was 90.3% (213 patients) for entire group, 89.7% (131 patients) for the microscopic group, and 91.1% (82 patients) for the endoscopic group (p=0.727). The functional success rate (ABG ≤ 10 dB) was 72.5% (171 patients) in the entire group. The mean hearing gain was 12.4±10.8 and 12.8±9 dB in the microscopic and endoscopic groups respectively. Conclusion: Endoscopic technique offers similar graft success and hearing outcomes to microscopic technique along with a shorter operation time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENT Updates\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENT Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.576183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENT Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32448/ENTUPDATES.576183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较内镜下和显微镜下鼓室成形术在移植物成功率和听力增益方面的差异。方法:回顾性比较2014年1月至2017年6月期间236名年龄在18至74岁之间接受鼓膜成形术的慢性中耳炎患者(99名女性和137名男性)的医疗记录。将患者分为两组;显微镜下鼓膜成形术(140例)、内镜下鼓膜成形法(96例)。评估人口统计学数据、术前和术后6个月纯音听力测量结果、手术时间、听力增益和移植物成功率。结果:内镜组和显微镜组的平均手术时间分别为57.8±9.6分钟和78.6±17.7分钟(p<0.001)。显微镜组和内镜组的平均术前空气骨间隙(ABG)分别为24.1±11.5 dB和22.7±9.2 dB,而术后平均ABG分别为11.6±9.9和9.8±9.3 dB。全组移植物成功率为90.3%(213例),显微镜组为89.7%(131例),内镜组为91.1%(82例)(p=0.727)。全组功能成功率(ABG≤10dB)为72.5%(171例)。显微镜组和内窥镜组的平均听力增益分别为12.4±10.8和12.8±9dB。结论:内窥镜技术提供了与显微镜技术相似的移植物成功率和听力结果,并且手术时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of endoscopic and microscopic techniques for the repair of tympanic membrane perforations
Objective: This study aims to compare endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty in terms of graft success rate and hearing gain. Methods: Medical records of 236 patients (99 females and 137 males) aged 18 to 74 years with chronic otitis media who underwent myringoplasty, between January 2014 and June 2017 were retrospectively compared. Patients were divided into two groups; microscopic myringoplasty (140 patients), endoscopic myringoplasty (96 patients). Demographic data, pure tone audiometric results preoperatively and 6 months postopera­tively, operation time, hearing gain and graft success rate were evaluated. Results: The mean operation time was 57.8±9.6 minutes for the endoscopic group and 78.6±17.7 minutes for the microscopic group (p<0.001). The mean preoperative air bone gap (ABG) was 24.1±11.5 dB for the microscopic group and 22.7±9.2 dB for the endoscopic group, whereas the mean postoperative ABG was 11.6±9.9 and 9.8±9.3 dB respectively. Graft success rate was 90.3% (213 patients) for entire group, 89.7% (131 patients) for the microscopic group, and 91.1% (82 patients) for the endoscopic group (p=0.727). The functional success rate (ABG ≤ 10 dB) was 72.5% (171 patients) in the entire group. The mean hearing gain was 12.4±10.8 and 12.8±9 dB in the microscopic and endoscopic groups respectively. Conclusion: Endoscopic technique offers similar graft success and hearing outcomes to microscopic technique along with a shorter operation time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ENT Updates
ENT Updates OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frankie Valli: How Stapes Surgery Saved His Career Domenico Cotugno (1736-1822), Antonio Scarpa (1752-1832), and Alfonso Corti (1822-1876): The Most Important Discoveries of the Inner Ear Made by Young Italian Physicians—Domenico Cotugno Association of Face Mask Use With Nasal Symptoms And Mucociliary Clearance Examination of the Clinic, Radiologic, and Demographic Characteristics of 436 Patients with Nasal Fracture Ear Nose Throat Foreign Bodies in Children: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1